Genetic or Not, Gay Won’t Go Away

......

1) Please point out where I have said that...

2) That is the way some define the institution of marriage...others define it as..an institution.

3) What you are for, or against, is irrelevant on the utter constitutionality of denying the same benefits of a Democracy for some while affirming it for others because you happen to approve of a certain cncept.

I also take offense at the word used: ENTITLED...who are YOU to decide what homosexuals are entitled to? Perhaps the definition and concept of marriage is wrong to begin with. If you are speaking from a religious aspect, maybe you are in the wrong religion.

 

.....

Oh wonderful, we have a response from a person who knows that it doesn't work with lesbians. Do tell us, dear, why doesn't it work?

 

OK, please refer to post #1 where, and I quote from Y O U

"Heterosexual men feel that marriage is meant to be between a man and a woman forgetting that they have a marriage with one woman but have sex with many women, and they don’t want anything to disturb the sanctity of that marriage...or the sex with other women.

Homosexual men are happy with one lover but are not ‘allowed’ to marry"


hmm, spin cycles are best left for washing machines. You can back off from the statement and simply state that perhaps your broad brush is incorrect

 

BS on the Constitutionality angle.

There is no discrimination here. All citizens in the US are allowed to Marry, and are expected to follow the same ruleset..or criteria to do so.

A Straight man cannot show up with 5 women, anymore than a Gay man can show up with another Man. It's equal across the board in what marriage allows. 1 Man and 1 Woman.

Anyone who goes outside the scope of this willingly denies themselves from a Marriage.

 

There's nothing remarkable about it at all. It's just the same tired hypocritical arguments regurgitated again. The goal is to end condemnation of homosexuality by condemning everyone who doesn't accept it.

This right here is a classic liberal fail of an argument. It is consistent with their beliefs in just about everything else that if something cannot be flawless, then there is no point in even trying to make it good. If heterosexual marriages fail, then there is obviously no sanctity to marriage and society should just adopt an "anything goes" attitude instead.

This is called throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Personally, I do think the divorce rate in this country is appalling, and society needs to address it. I think Hollywood is ground zero for the destruction of marriage and the family unit. Not just because celebrities have no sense of maturity or responsibility, but because our culture puts them on a pedistal as something to idolize and emulate. So the more retarded they act, the more retarded society becomes as a result.

And this is a total straw man. There is no law anywhere stating that anyone has to be alone. The melodramatic "gay rights" people try to turn the government not recognizing a legal contract into some kind of malicious personal attack and persecution designed to hold them back from being together. And the overly emotional liberals are all too happy to eat it up because there is nothing a liberal loves more than to jump on board a good victim cause. It makes them feel important.

 

Maybe homosexuality is some form of natural control mechanism. Too many people in the world, nature steps in to curb the population explosion. If there's a God, it could be God's way of intervening...too dam many people...slow down the reproduction rate. There seems to be more and more gay folk out and about. One never knows why...does one.

 

If there is a gay gene;
step 1 identify gay gene then abort any fetuses with it.
step 2 learn to switch gay gene off, stop aborting fetuses with it and cure them instead.
Problem solved.


Just another genetic defect.

 

That's exactly right. Look at the kids who are attacked by school officials for disagreeing.

Its pure liberal fascism.

 

Lesbians dont like the penis.

Bad Penis Bad

 

I just wish we separated marriage from the government.

Give civil unions the same benefits as marriage, leave marriage up to the churches, and then everybody's happy.

This is less about marriage and more about everyone having the same civil rights.

 

According to the massive religious science technology investigations of the modern religious doctors and lawyers. They say gay can be treated. Because jeasus said so.

 

.....

Oh my dear, I feel so sorry for you; you don't know what you are missing!

When I pick up my b/f at the airport, I race home, careening around corners, running red lights, and we hardly make it thru my front door and are taking each other's clothes off, and dinner stays in the oven, sometimes overnight.

Why the commotion, do your ask.....Because I miss mr. penis when he's not around...

 

You're quoted verbatim in my response. I'm incredulous that you could have overlooked the quote...

Fair enough - add institution to the list.

I've already expressed my support for gay & lesbian civil unions, so I'm not denying gays and lesbians any benefits.

Who are YOU and homosexuals to redefine the union of a man and a woman? There's nothing wrong with the definition of marriage, and if you and homosexuals have a problem with that, too bad. Nobody is obligated to submit to your dictatorial revisionism and negation.

 

Lol!!!!

______

 

These are scarier

 

I don't think it works retroactively.

 

......

OMG...I love those shoes, can you ask your friend where he got them?

 

.....

1) What I actually said "verbatim" was: "Nobody should be alone in this life, and it matters not what sex the other person is, but only that they love you back to the exclusion of everyone else. Gays achieve that much more readily than straights." so don't quote untrue statements that can be easily checked...your credibility now sucs.

2) Civil unions just don't do it for gays/lesbians that want a marriage and family life. You are being condescending to allow them a "civil union" when they want marriage just like you have. Why does that upset you so much?

3) Because we have already have the option to get married if we want, while gays and lesbians don't have that right. Why not? They live with the same Constitution promising the right to seek happiness as we do....

You are being unnecessarily frightened of gay marriage, probably because of the marriage statistics that heteros have unhappily produced, and you think that gays and lesbians would show you how you guys 'work' your marriages; but all they want to do is marry their lover and be happy...why does that scare you? They are as equal as you, and probably more so. If they are not equal enough for marriage, then why are you?

 

Gays like company.

As the pool of available new gays dries up the older ones are going to start feeling isolated again.

Sort of like the Last of the Mohicans in high heels and a lisp.

 

Marriage and Family Life don't come with the Gay lifestyle, sorry Agent. If they really want what others have, they would start having heterosexual relationships, and follow the same Marriage ruleset we are all expected to follow.

As long as we select our mate from the appropriate gender. See the rules apply to all in the same way.

Of course they do, they simply want something else. Are you trying to say that a Gay man cannot bring a Woman to the Altar and get Married?
You're peddling falsehoods and misinformation.

 

Who are these 'activists' and where are they? See, there was similar talk about blacks not so long ago...
The last documented lynching of a black was in 1968. What an advanced and enlightened society you live in.

 

Pfft. SIG makes the best handguns.

 

comparing skin color to how one has sex is an insult to what blacks went through

2 women walking down the street; which one is gay ?

2 women walking down the street, which one is black?

 

I sincerely hope right wingers aren't against DNA testing, as well as abortion. They seem to want to tyrannically control reproduction.

 

Cynthia Nixon Continues To Raise Righteous Hell:

HEADLINES FROM 1972: Film and TV workers take aim at Nixon for criticizing tax breaks.

Cynthia Nixon’s platform for governor is a show stopper to these furious film and TV industry workers who used to share a set with her.

The “Sex and the City” actress and Democratic candidate for guv was blasted by production crew and small businesses after she bashed a big film industry tax break that helped earn her fat paychecks.

“If you had your way you would bring production to a halt, causing long term damage to the New York economy, and more personally, you would take away our livelihoods,” 40 vendors and crew workers with New Yorkers for TV & Film Jobs wrote in an open letter to Nixon defending the $420 million program.

On the one hand, it’s fascinating to watch a mass of Hillary supporting leftists rally to support a tax break.* On the other, it’s good to see Glenn’s “Repeal the Hollywood Tax Cuts” mantra finding “unexpected” east coast support.

As Robert Conquest stated in his First Law of Politics, “Everyone is conservative about what he knows best.”