Getting back to the abortion issue i.e. Roe overturned..

I didn’t ask to be a woman, but how I take care of my body is none of your or government’s business. Just because I have a uterus doesn’t mean i am the position of tolerating you telling me what to do.

 

Since when does any American have to make medical decisions and live according to your religion or whatever? You can have your insane opinions but once you start making laws to force 10 year olds to carry a rapists baby, don’t expect the majority of Americans to appreciate or respect those values.

 

Please stop pretending that you have a monopoly on science to prop up your opinion and dictate it to everyone.

A mindless, microscopic amalgam of cells is just that.

Yes, a woman's right to make personal reproductive decisions is not dependent upon the public consensus, even though they coincide.

 

I wasn't telling you what to do.. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
How convenient for you that you don't know "voluntarily" des not mean "forced".

So then you KNOW the difference???

What is it?

What laws say a fetus , or anyone, can use another's body to sustain their life WITHOUT CONSENT?????
WHERE ??????

Well, they can and WHAT contract did the woman sign ????...LOLOLL

,

WHERE TF does "science" tell you a fetus due to rape is different from a fetus due to consensual sex ... WHERE?

AGAIN, where is the right to use another's body to sustain life??

LOLO, you see only what you want to see to dodge the obvious hypocritical stance of Anti-Choicers who make exception for rape




FoxHastings said: ↑
LOL, so the fetus is a "precious life with rights" until Anti-Choicers say it's not?? HILARIOUSLY hypocritical !


AND once AGAIN proving that Anti-Choicers simply want to punish women who had consensual sex..

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Meaning that the poster I was addressing is not responsible for other's actions...

Simple English

Squirmy squirmy.....THAT poster does not get to tell other's what their responsibilities are where it concerns personal matters and anyone could see that is what I meant....but keep squirming ......

 

YUP, punish the woman who had consensual sex by forcing her to gestate....!!!!!

OH, and HER body is NOT the ZEF's ...

There ya go , trying to dictate OTHER'S responsibilities !!!

It IS responsible to abort a kid you don't want and/or can't afford.


because Anti-Choicers HATE paying taxes to care for poor kids...

 

BS. You said if I have a uterus then I should make decisions that are responsible. I didn’t ask for you input on my uterus and I am interested in hearing it.

 

HOLY HELL! Where did I post that rubbish

WOW!

 

If the unit is not needed, it should be left off. How can you say that and argue that you’re not telling what to do with my uterus? You’re offensive as ****. Stop playing victim.

 

Don't run!!! You acuse me of saying something, so lets deal with that first!

 

I don't care to much about how to reduce gun violence.
Making sure owners know safety rules and proper operation is a good step.

 

Yet at the same time the leftist team want to reduce the total number of gun owners. And, at the same time, the leftist team wants lower the age at which sex education is taught in public schools, as if ten year old kids were getting pregnant before now, thereby increasing the number of kids exposed to sex.

Maybe if you gun grabbers did not alarm those on the fence into getting a gun by threatening bans less people would have gotten guns. But the left never considers unintended consequences, only the desired outcome.

 

Did you really say this in response to a post that said government should not be using religion in making laws?

Additionally, I have already stated in this thread that I would make an exception for rape due to consent not given. So your attempted appeal to emotion via strawman is a failure.

 

That would be a great thing to teach in school.

 

Except in this case I do have a monopoly on science because you're not using any. :shrug:

What you're ignoring in this simple minded statement is that it is the beginning of a human's life cycle. Scientific fact.

As with all Rights, her rights end where another human's Rights begin.

 

Most states already offer Hunter safety programs. Anyone can take it.

 

And what the first thing they teach you in hunters safety class?

It's- "Don't point your gun at anything you don't intend to kill"

If only the sex education proponents would teach the same principle we might have fewer unintended pregnancies.

 

both parties have their share of big government policies.

America is a big country, she needs a big government. or rather, that is what the electorate wants, overall.

Why? Because that is what we have, we got here via elections.

We have the very government we deserve.

Right?

 

What makes it more deserving of rights than the woman?

 

Ya, those are good too. But they're often not very cheap, convenient or well publicized. If the goal is to promote safety and competency, we could do a lot better with the promotion part by making it more accessible.

 

I'm an old guy. When I was young it was the era of "PEACE! LOVE! DOPE!" We screwed like rabbits. Abortion wasn't a problem because we all knew (male and female) about condoms, IUD's, THE PILL, and diaphragms. Abortion wasn't a big deal because not getting pregnant was easy. Don't young folks today know about condoms, IUD's, THE PILL, and diaphragms?

 

I recognize that you are unable to grasp that a microscopic, mindless entity is not a person, in the same way an acorn is not an oak tree.

You can entertain yourself with such nonsense, but you cannot inflict your belief upon everyone else.

 

LOL, and Ozzie and Harriet were real and abortion wasn't invented until 1974 and women never had unwanted pregnancies before 1974 and guys had to worry about getting pregnant and Santa Claus is real.

 

A fetus's rights don't exist but would end where the woman's rights begin