Global Impending Economic Doom Thread.

Ok Miss Beevis.

 

No bother Sir Dagonet

 

So how will you control the burn to look like the state you plan on forming?

 

Now back to your silly exploitation hyperbole

 

Question is a bit vague, I need a bit more to answer.

 

Pure insanity or lies. Nothing was worked out with China with whom we run $40 billion monthly deficit( total for all countries is $54 billion). If we had same deal with Canada and Mexico, Canada and Mexico would not have resisted Trumps deal. 1+1=2

 

Hillarys plan was to dump it too. Still waiting for Lafayette to get one thing right!!

 

this of course is the idiotic Marxist definition. It got 120 million killed but socialists are committed to 200 million dead before they give up on the deadliest idea in human history!!

 

Thought the character fitted your fake fight quite neatly!

In summary, we have the definition of capitalism referring directly to surplus stolen from worker. No need to thank me mind you. Happy to improve your vocabulary

 

Now you added "stolen".
How hyperbolic of you.
Perhaps youd rather have the surplus "stolen" by government and directed into the pocket of your firm, which is how you make your living

 

I'm wondering if this is supposed to make sense. I'm thinking not.

 

500 milion subsistence farmers in China gave it all up to have their surplus stolen from them by Foxconn. What were they thinking when they freely took those jobs and kept them!!

 

Don't shy away. You consult to help firms navigate government restrictions and market managing tax codes. Your income is predicated on government "stealing" the surplus.
Under real capitalism, you are useless.
You are the skimmer under managed markets, and love them accordingly

 

Why are you making stuff up? Seems a little churlish! I have no dealings with government.

An apology would be nice!

 

There was no deal with China, there was a negotiated deal with most Asian countries including Japan and South Korea, which would have created an economic alliance to counter China's economic power.

 

I said you dealt with government?
Do say

 

Directly or indirectly. You've made complete nonsense about me up. Weird behaviour if you ask me.

 

You've posted that your firm is consulted to help companies navigate the bureaucratic/tax quagmire imposed by government in its attempts to manage markets and behavior. The government siphon leads to your pocket, and you have the balls to talk about surplus and exploitation without government intervention.
Ain't corporatism great?

 

Thanks for the charts and data.. caveat emptor is still needed, but i appreciate the perspective.

I do see the plundering of the treasury, begun by the great generation, then turned into an art by boomers. ..won't be much left but a popped bubble, for millennials..

 

No I didn't. Please stop lying. It's pathetic.

 

You forget the stories you weave

 

Nope. I simply know when someone is talking utter bobbins as they can't construct valid argument.

 

Say "exploit" again.
It was so cute the first couple of times you said it

 

From openly fibbing to childishness? An improvement at least.

 

Oh yeah, that's right, you didn't jump into the argument with the childish hyperbole of "exploit".