Incorrect. It was being inquired as to what possible reason there is on the part of yourself for refusing to elaborate on exactly what limitations government may implement on firearms.
Which does not actually detail anything. The only explanation for this evasiveness, is because the statement made by yourself is not truly understood by yourself, and such would be revealed if your statement were elaborated on. That is the only reason why there is no actual effort to explain just what this supposed power possessed by government amounts to in real-world terms.
If it is not, then elaborate. Exactly what power does government possess when it comes to regulating firearms? What can it do, and what can it not do?
"It's impossible to know exactly how often guns stop criminals because who reports a crime that doesn't happen." --John Stossel
Incorrect. Dissension is fine. It's part of what makes America great. Disagreeing with Pro-Communist/Anti-American rhetoric is a political decision, not just "all dissention as communist despite the Cold war being long over".
You don't want debate. You want acquiescence. Not going to happen. Your position is devoid of merit and I care nothing for the beliefs you espouse. I will, however, continue to call you out on your campaign to gut and destroy the Constitution.
But but it saves lives why because it does how because it works great why Don't you care about innocent lives How does it help Because its a HUGE SUCCESS why DON'T YOU WANT HONEST DEBATE
rational debate is a funny topic coming from you. You deny the merit of logical deduction or rational debate and pretend that "science" is more important example-we note that if the goal of laws is to decrease violent crime, its logical to push for laws that target the group most likely to commit violent crime rather than targeting the people LEAST LIKELY TO commit crime. that is a logically based argument. But you pretend that means nothing and ignore that with silly one liners like ITS ABOUT SAVING LIVES.
I love this line If the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun, then the only guy I want to see packing is Jesus. He’s the only good guy I trust. And he’s packing, alright. But his weapon is a cross not a gun, and he calls his followers to pick up our own. Read more at http://www.patheos.com/blogs/theolo...is-a-good-guy-with-a-gun/#mAItYQK4G3Kol0Fx.99
So, why is this almost uniquely an American thing? IF it is so essential why do not countries without concealed carry have higher muder rates?
It is about saving lives - what other issue is there? Is your 10 year old TV worth more than a 10 year old child?