GOP Rep. Gohmert unloads on 'smirking' Strzok: 'How many times did you look so innocent into your wi

Wrong, Trump's a dumb arse too if does some chit like that. I don't need you to lump me in with no one. I believe in doing the right thing, have been my whole life. All I've said since day one is show me the money, if your side has something on Trump lets see it and none of this your dumb if you don't believe this guy is cheating nonsense. If he's cheating lets see it.

 

Trump does not to try present himself as a Boy Scout. I suspect you have noticed.

 

All Purple Hearts are not equal.

"I served as a combat surgeon in DaNang, (U.S. Naval Support Hospital) from Dec. 10, 1967, through Dec. 11, 1968. While there, I evaluated and treated hundreds of severely wounded combatants.
During my year in DaNang, a few combatants urged me to verify small abrasions as "wounds" so they could get a Purple Heart. Each freely admitted trying to acquire Purple Hearts as rapidly as possible to take advantage of the policy allowing those with three Purple Hearts to apply to leave Vietnam early. I refused them. But some went shopping for another opinion. Unfortunately, we had some antiwar physicians in Vietnam who were happy to become accomplices in these frauds. Most with valid Purple Hearts didn't need to apply to leave Vietnam: The seriousness of their wounds demanded it.
Lt. John Kerry's collecting three Purple Hearts within 100 days — all for wounds too minor to require hospitalization — recalls the distasteful memories of having to deal with those few miscreants in DaNang. More disturbing is the revelation that crewmen on Mr. Kerry's boat denied they had received any gunfire from shore at the time when Lt. Kerry claimed such gunfire had caused his wound. The doctor who disapproved Lt. Kerry's application for his first Purple Heart for that wound agreed that the tiny metal splinter sticking in the skin of his arm was inconsistent with enemy gunfire from shore. His crewmates claimed that Lt. Kerry, himself, had fired a grenade launcher from the boat striking a rock on the nearby shore — and his wound was from a metal splinter from the grenade that ricocheted back, striking him in the arm."

'Trying to acquire Purple Hearts', By Martin L. Fackler, August 26, 2004.
Dr. Martin L. Fackler served as a combat surgeon in Vietman in 1968. A fellow of both the American College of Surgeons and the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, he also is an author, expert witness and lecturer on wound ballistics and surgery, and former director of the Wound Ballistics Laboratory at Presidio.
https://www.keltecforum.com/forum/political-legal-discussion/1543-dr-martin-fackler.html

 

So he gets a pass, what sort of horseshit logic is that.

 

No, Trump does not get a pass. Trump's supporters, unlike Strzok's apologists, know their guy is not a Boy Scout.

 

The republicans were so pathetic and desperate because they had zero evidence he influenced the investigation they had to resort to this.

 

My boss' business picked up almost immediately after Trump became president and shortly thereafter all of his employees got significant raises. In comparison wages were flat for eight years of Obamanomics. Economically Blacks and Hispanics are doing just fine under Trump's economic policies. Under Obama . . . they were UNDER . . . Obama.

 

There is no my side. If you do not want to be lumped into the gang Ogden Trump supporters then do not lump me into into "your side". The Justice Department is still investigating so they are still looking for the "money" therefore it is up to the Justice Department to determine if and who in the Trump chain possibly was complicite.

 

The Clinton's have been investigated more times by the GOP in Congress than anyone else, even the mafia.But you want us to believe only the Dems have bias?

 

There are no Strzok's applogists and he is not getting a pass for his texts which were unprofessional, stupid, wrong,mand uncalled for government employee to make.n

 

So what made them fellows all get jobs all of a sudden? The lack of illegals allowed to flow unhindered since 1980?

 

Hey, kool-aid drinker, you can get rid of Trump by throwing him out of office. How can I get rid of Strzok?

 

Huh??

 

I had to rewind it when I heard one of the dems tell Gohmert he needed to take his meds. I had to make sure I heard it right because that's something I haven't heard since high school.

 

Fair enough

 

Trumponomics.

 

No such dog.He has done nothing different than previous presidents.

 

I didn't vote for the cartoon character, I voted for the guy that's saving our country. My income isn't a joke, especially after the tax decrease. If an FBI agent had plans on effecting our election, I want to know. I don't want to deflect this situation by acting like everything that was on my back burner two days ago is suddenly front and center after Strzok's questioning. I love how the side that's been bitching for a year and a half about a rigged election suddenly have more concerns for everything besides a source that wanted to sway the election.

But you do you, inconsistent concerns Quadhole. I bet the crying side will fall right in line with your inconsistent whining.

 

Except of course for unleashing the economy you might have something.

 

A Republican trying to hang someone out for cheating on their wife is laughable. They tried to trip, anger, humiliate, etc. the guy and he stuck it right back up their ass. What did they accomplish? Nothing.

 

Democrats and the stonewalling FBI made sure of that.

 

I don't think a federal employee who calls American voters "ignorant hillbillies" and claims he can smell them in Walmart should be on a taxpayer financed payroll. So I asked how do I get rid of him. Simple enough.

 

So swaying the election doesn't matter to you unless it involves Russians, right?

 

Republicans were just trying to grand stand for Trump.

 

Oh we get your inconsistent cries. But he asked for English and you swapped to math. Do you complain about the Russians?