Gov. Little signs ‘Fetal Heartbeat Bill’ into law, protecting the lives of the preborn

I am at the age that I understand unlike you it seems that what I want and get are two different things. You keep acting like the Supreme court changed it's rulings.

 

You are the snarky one when you blurted out this babble.

Governor Little of Idaho did not use violence when he signed the new law.

 

Demonstrating the point stated previously - that you do not understand what Law is - and don't understand what you read.

No one said Idaho Gov't used violence to sign a new law .. perhaps go back and try reading again as you were clearly confused the first go around.

 

But of course YOU can't point out how and where.....or answer posts you quote.....and say you hate something but do it anyway.....uh, pretty funny...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Then you're against banning abortion...right?

The question you're ducking was :
Then you're against banning abortion...right?

POINT OUT WHERE I INDICATED THIS …...
besides in your imagination...

 

You sound a bit unhappy and disintegrated, Robbo. What's wrong?

I would seriously recommend journaling as it is a great tool of introspection.

No one should live a life where they do not get what they want or want unattainable things.

 

I am sorry to get in this late, but is there a difference between a pre heart beat fetus and a post heart beat fetus? Are they of unequal value? Or are these just artificial goal posts and you agree with artificial goal posts?

 

My major issue is with human life. That is the major reason I agree with our Governor.

My major issue with Democrats politically is they are authoritarians of extreme nature.

For an unknown reason they prefer that humans are not allowed to be born. There are issues of life that they seem in the dark about.

 

Thanks a lot but I am not unhappy and am very composed.

 

An authoritarian would want to force women to gestate.....Democrats believe women are human beings who should have rights like choice....they do NOT want to force women to gestate like broodstock...the other party DOES making them the authoritarians.

Show all the people who said they prefer humans not be allowed to be born...

Nope, not in the dark at all....they believe women are human beings with rights....it's the other party that doesn't...

 

Thanks for the non-answers. So, you agree with the governor that an abortion is allowable prior to a detectable heart beat? They are not of equal value to you or is this just a random goal post?

You call Democrats extreme authoritarians. I am guessing because they believe in a right to choose. What is more authoritarian then telling a woman she has no right to choose what happens to her body?

The idea of choice doesn't tell a woman what to do. It gives a woman the right to decide what is best for her and her family.

 

Your guess is wrong.

I call Democrats authoritarians due to them being the party that blasts our country with law upon law upon useless law.
Why were kings bad?
They did what Democrats do, pass thousands of laws.
Democrats got angry at Trump for removing laws that were lousy.

 

(UnitedVoice.com) – In 2020, the Senate confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, cementing the court’s conservative tilt. Pro-life advocates were ecstatic. They felt as though this might give them the opportunity they needed to get abortion back in front of the high court — and that’s exactly what’s happening.

On Monday, May 17, the SCOTUS agreed to hear a case about abortion rights. The justices will decide whether Mississippi has a right to implement its ban on abortions after 15 weeks gestation. The law was blocked by a lower court on the grounds that the high court has already set a precedent preventing states from banning abortions if a fetus could not survive outside of the womb, which typically happens around 24 weeks.

 

Hang on

sentence two contradicts sentence one.

 

Do you believe that this bill will reduce the number of abortions in Mississippi?

 

So you complain about laws, but the OP is about another law that you don't seem to want to discuss. So, the laws you like are not authoritarian apparently and you don't want to talk about them.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
An authoritarian would want to force women to gestate.....Democrats believe women are human beings who should have rights like choice....they do NOT want to force women to gestate like broodstock...the other party DOES making them the authoritarians.




Show all the people who said they prefer humans not be allowed to be born...



Nope, not in the dark at all....they believe women are human beings with rights....it's the other party that doesn't...

So, once again, you couldn't address my post...no surprise there.

 

Another thread about how Anti-Choicers delight in the thought of women losing their rights.

And, as usual, righties do not think ahead, of consequences.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised to support MORE poor children ?.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised for more schools....and school lunches for poor kids?

...and taxes raised for more court cases, more jails for those "Evil Women", more support for the care of children of incarcerated women.

They haven't been willing for their taxes to be used for any entity that aids poor children.....Will they change? I doubt it..


...and,of course, they have no practical solutions as to HOW abortion would be investigated or proven...

.and they FLEE from stating how these "murdering" women should be punished...

Nope, they just do the Happy Dance because they are making women's lives harder...

 

Just suppose you had been aborted. Imagine that for a time.

 

Actually our congress and Government is as you mention, also authoritative.
But they went after bad law.

Imagine that law made long ago, what if it is the law today?
Remember this ruling. Dred Scott v Sandford.

 

I do try not to opine on matters I have not studied. I do not know the conditions in Mississippi.

 

Democrats went on a rampage to make more laws from about 1933 until today.

Democrats major protest is republicans seek to remove those laws.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Another thread about how Anti-Choicers delight in the thought of women losing their rights.

And, as usual, righties do not think ahead, of consequences.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised to support MORE poor children ?.

How willing will they be to have their taxes raised for more schools....and school lunches for poor kids?

...and taxes raised for more court cases, more jails for those "Evil Women", more support for the care of children of incarcerated women.

They haven't been willing for their taxes to be used for any entity that aids poor children.....Will they change? I doubt it..


...and,of course, they have no practical solutions as to HOW abortion would be investigated or proven...

.and they FLEE from stating how these "murdering" women should be punished...

Nope, they just do the Happy Dance because they are making women's lives harder...

HUGE DODGE of the post of mine you quoted.
Copied from post 417 : """" So, once again, you couldn't address my post...no surprise there.""

AND:

DUHHHHH,if I had been aborted there would be nothing to imagine....melodramatic claptrap doesn't address the post !!!!

 

"""Democrats major protest is republicans seek to remove those laws."""

Uh, could you rewrite that sentence so it bears some resemblance to English?...

 

Sorry you do not understand written English.
Of all the things you find Democrats whining over is they hate republicans removing laws and regulations.