You're attempting to refer to creative destruction. Of course the concept is actually used to highlight socialism as the end outcome.
1) capitalism is self correcting opposite of what Marx said to you 2) govt intervention can be to support freedom and capitalism or not. Do you understand?
You're way behind. Economics has understood the concept of multiple equilibria for some time. There's no natural tendency to the optimal outcome. You think the attacks on Iraq and destabilization of Syria were about freedom?
so creative destruction capitalism is supposed to lead to communism??? How??? You are back in the 1930's when they thought FANG like companies would never start again in someone's garage!! See how silly Marx was??
but only because there was not enough support to make debt illegal. Half the Republicans are more like Democrats than Republicans. Do you understand?
You're showing your naivety again. The republicans celebrate influence costs such as the MIC. They inflate inefficiency and generate destructive foreign policy.
That's how the MIC works. Destabilising inefficiency ignored as jingoistic nationalism is used to manipulate the plebs
MIC here is govt related so it is inefficient but still more efficient than socialist EEC( entire economy complex). Jingoistic?? Do you want the Girl Scouts to police the world so idiotic Brits get bombed to Smitherines again? Did you know prostitutes in England could feel in the dark a soldiers rank on his shoulders and determine what to charge him while they had sex during Nazi air raids.
No content here at all, except for tacit support of MIC inefficiency. That's the problem with American Republicans. They're in the pocket of big business and the right wing electorate are incapable of restricting their inefficiency (providing one reason why debt goes through the roof)
You're not making sense. There's no capitalism versus socialism here. Instead there is government waste. That you support that waste is standard. Nationalism is used to herd and protect the rent seekers
a capitalist country will have a more efficient military than a socialist military. This is why the Soviets stole our secrets and we needed none of theirs. Get it now??
Only because wages for Labor, have not kept up. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will make capitalism seem, much more fine and wonderful.
This amuses me. Given the magnitude of US expenditure (and it's share of world expenditure), that is also particularly naive. Happy for you to support it mind you. Refer to an efficiency study (typically DEA) which supports your premise.