Really, the Bolton revelation came out when ? Parnas turned on Trump during the house investigation ? Ummmm NO Hell, just this weekend Lindsey Graham basically admitted that Giuliani WAS in Ukraine getting the Ukrainian government to get dirt on the Bidens. He LITERALLY said they are “creating a channel thru AG Barr, for Giuliani to communicate his finds”. FFS, the Kabul is right in front of your face, and your denying you have a face When the dems asked for Bolton the White House claimed blanket immunity. Your literally revising history to claim different Yeah, now the 75% are “clueless” ? Man, the cult is strong in you
Yeah I bet 75% could not even tell what the impeadment was about and Trump's legal counsel told Schiff first that his subpoenas had not been authorized by the House, they had not, and that they would exert executive privilege if he resubmitted. The House voted to authorize them and Schiff never resubmitted them. He choose not to take it to court, he sleeps in the bed he made. Do you now admit there were 13 witnesses?
Happy Acquittal Day! gives new meaning to the upcoming 'presidents day' holiday ! trump should sign an eo moving president's day up one week
It was bittersweet for me. I was ecstatic at the acquittal but felt dread at witnessing the possible beginning of the end of our constitutional republic.
FFS man. They would "exert executive privilege". So what your saying is that what I said was correct right ? He would not let anyone testify if they were subpoenaed. That INCLUDES John Bolton ! Yes, there were 13.........and many said he did it. So if we are to go with that, then he's guilty right ?
nope... whether or not trump stated he would exert executive privilege is irrelevant, because schiff never resubmitted with proper subpoenas to the judiciary, ergo trump never exerted privilege, ergo no obstruction... the witnesses themselves are also irrelevant because they never testified during the house 'investigation' because schiff refused to allow anyone else to question them... even if he had, the witness testimony was all opinion... hash this out a trillion times and it still comes out with nada... opinion is not fact of an overt crime...
Yes, I agree. Watching one party be so desperate that they would destroy the significance of impeachment and reduce it to a mere political tool is very sad for this country.
Yes if he resubmitted then they would tell him to take it to court under executive privilege. Schiff refused to do so. They said they had no first hand knowledge of a quid pro quo or a bribe or and extortion and that they knew Bursima was crooked and had warned the Obama administration about Hunter Biden getting that seat under shall we say highly unusual circumstances at the least.
1. Trump said he would use blanket immunity. He DID refuse to allow anyone to testify. He DID deny all state department employees to use any notes, or any documents they had while at the state department while testifying. 2. You live in la la land. I literally watched republicans asking questions to EVERY person who testified ON NATIONAL TV FFS. And yesterday Lindsey Graham said on national TV that they had set up a process that all of the evidence that Giuliani obtained would go thru Bill Barr, our current Attorney General. They literally admitted that they were doing exactly what they said they weren’t in the trial. You have a sitting president using the United States government to investigate his political rivals, and you claim it all “opinion” ? Your deep in this cult my friend
Thats beyond ridiculous and you know it. The threat of a filibuster stops any bill from going thru and you know it. The president asserting publicly that he would claim blanket immunity means it could possibly drag out for years.
I'm more cynical. Remember how he used to be nothing more than McCain's political shadow? I think that John McCain was holding something over his head that would have wrecked him, because immediately after McCain's death Lindsay finally began acting more like a conservative than a RINO.
fact, my post referenced the events nothing more... your post resorted to personal ridicule of the messenger... when one resorts to personal attack its because they have no basis for actual rebuttal... typical of the syndromed leftists...
So your response is that I’m attacking you ? Deflect Much ? I used facts to point out what was happening, thats wasn’t an attack on you. But you knew that, because you knew you couldn’t debate what was said
Well accept of course there exists sufficient predicate for Giuliani's fact finding tour in the Ukraine. It's called Biden pers big mouth, tie that in with several articles from politico and you that wonder thing the Dems didn't have and were never able to produce probable cause.
No, thats not. You conveniently leave out that no matter what Biden said, HE does not how the power to hold anything, He isn't the person that holds/releases any money to any foreign nation. And Giuliani isn't there looking at Joe, he's looking at Hunter and Burisma, to use that against Joe. The POTUS is literally using the power of the US government to investigate his political rivals. Thats not really up for debate and you know it. He knew full well that his base wouldn't bat an eye when he started saying it out loud that he was actually doing what he was accused of in the impeachment trial. The "sham" trial just became real, byt the real sham was perpetrated by the Republicans and his supporters
Biden you forget held up aid to get a prosecutor fired. With his son working there and drawing a seven figure salary for a job that generally pays a third of that there is no way Biden should have had anything at all to do with anything going on in the Ukraine.
Biden did NOT hold up aid to Ukrain. This is just a fact you cant escape, because he had no power over the money. NONE, NADA, ZILCH Really, nothing to do with Ukrain ? Then you also think that Ivanka should have nothing to do with China then right ?