Happy Acquittal Day!

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by LoneStarGal, Feb 5, 2020.

  1. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,249
    Likes Received:
    33,214
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    :roflol:
     
  2. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Really, the Bolton revelation came out when ? Parnas turned on Trump during the house investigation ? Ummmm NO

    Hell, just this weekend Lindsey Graham basically admitted that Giuliani WAS in Ukraine getting the Ukrainian government to get dirt on the Bidens. He LITERALLY said they are “creating a channel thru AG Barr, for Giuliani to communicate his finds”. FFS, the Kabul is right in front of your face, and your denying you have a face

    When the dems asked for Bolton the White House claimed blanket immunity. Your literally revising history to claim different

    Yeah, now the 75% are “clueless” ? Man, the cult is strong in you
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2020
  3. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,945
    Likes Received:
    39,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah I bet 75% could not even tell what the impeadment was about and Trump's legal counsel told Schiff first that his subpoenas had not been authorized by the House, they had not, and that they would exert executive privilege if he resubmitted. The House voted to authorize them and Schiff never resubmitted them. He choose not to take it to court, he sleeps in the bed he made.

    Do you now admit there were 13 witnesses?
     
  4. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Happy Acquittal Day!

    gives new meaning to the upcoming 'presidents day' holiday !

    trump should sign an eo moving president's day up one week :D
     
    Gatewood likes this.
  5. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,576
    Likes Received:
    11,231
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It was bittersweet for me. I was ecstatic at the acquittal but felt dread at witnessing the possible beginning of the end of our constitutional republic.
     
    LoneStarGal and vman12 like this.
  6. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Democrats are so mad they're starting to wear all white again.
     
  7. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yup. :roflol::roflol::roflol:
     
    vman12 likes this.
  8. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it's because deep down they truly hate themselves
     
    US Conservative and vman12 like this.
  9. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113

    FFS man. They would "exert executive privilege". So what your saying is that what I said was correct right ? He would not let anyone testify if they were subpoenaed. That INCLUDES John Bolton !

    Yes, there were 13.........and many said he did it. So if we are to go with that, then he's guilty right ?
     
  10. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    nope... whether or not trump stated he would exert executive privilege is irrelevant, because schiff never resubmitted with proper subpoenas to the judiciary, ergo trump never exerted privilege, ergo no obstruction...
    the witnesses themselves are also irrelevant because they never testified during the house 'investigation' because schiff refused to allow anyone else to question them... even if he had, the witness testimony was all opinion...

    hash this out a trillion times and it still comes out with nada... opinion is not fact of an overt crime...
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2020
    US Conservative likes this.
  11. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, I agree. Watching one party be so desperate that they would destroy the significance of impeachment and reduce it to a mere political tool is very sad for this country.
     
    Blaster3 and US Conservative like this.
  12. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,945
    Likes Received:
    39,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes if he resubmitted then they would tell him to take it to court under executive privilege. Schiff refused to do so. They said they had no first hand knowledge of a quid pro quo or a bribe or and extortion and that they knew Bursima was crooked and had warned the Obama administration about Hunter Biden getting that seat under shall we say highly unusual circumstances at the least.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2020
  13. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1. Trump said he would use blanket immunity. He DID refuse to allow anyone to testify. He DID deny all state department employees to use any notes, or any documents they had while at the state department while testifying.

    2. You live in la la land. I literally watched republicans asking questions to EVERY person who testified ON NATIONAL TV

    FFS.

    And yesterday Lindsey Graham said on national TV that they had set up a process that all of the evidence that Giuliani obtained would go thru Bill Barr, our current Attorney General. They literally admitted that they were doing exactly what they said they weren’t in the trial. You have a sitting president using the United States government to investigate his political rivals, and you claim it all “opinion” ?

    Your deep in this cult my friend
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2020
  14. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Thats beyond ridiculous and you know it. The threat of a filibuster stops any bill from going thru and you know it. The president asserting publicly that he would claim blanket immunity means it could possibly drag out for years.
     
  15. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,614
    Likes Received:
    17,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually I think ole Lindsay had his come to Jesus moment at the Kavanaugh hearings.
     
    Pycckia and Gatewood like this.
  16. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm more cynical. Remember how he used to be nothing more than McCain's political shadow? I think that John McCain was holding something over his head that would have wrecked him, because immediately after McCain's death Lindsay finally began acting more like a conservative than a RINO.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2020
  17. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hope you're right but I doubt it.
     
  18. Blaster3

    Blaster3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    5,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    fact, my post referenced the events nothing more...
    your post resorted to personal ridicule of the messenger...

    when one resorts to personal attack its because they have no basis for actual rebuttal...

    typical of the syndromed leftists...
     
    Red Lily and US Conservative like this.
  19. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So your response is that I’m attacking you ?

    Deflect Much ?

    I used facts to point out what was happening, thats wasn’t an attack on you. But you knew that, because you knew you couldn’t debate what was said
     
  20. Creasy Tvedt

    Creasy Tvedt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2019
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    13,171
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's over, Johnny.
     
  21. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,614
    Likes Received:
    17,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well accept of course there exists sufficient predicate for Giuliani's fact finding tour in the Ukraine. It's called Biden pers big mouth, tie that in with several articles from politico and you that wonder thing the Dems didn't have and were never able to produce probable cause.
     
  22. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, thats not. You conveniently leave out that no matter what Biden said, HE does not how the power to hold anything, He isn't the person that holds/releases any money to any foreign nation.

    And Giuliani isn't there looking at Joe, he's looking at Hunter and Burisma, to use that against Joe.

    The POTUS is literally using the power of the US government to investigate his political rivals. Thats not really up for debate and you know it.

    He knew full well that his base wouldn't bat an eye when he started saying it out loud that he was actually doing what he was accused of in the impeachment trial. The "sham" trial just became real, byt the real sham was perpetrated by the Republicans and his supporters
     
  23. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,614
    Likes Received:
    17,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biden you forget held up aid to get a prosecutor fired. With his son working there and drawing a seven figure salary for a job that generally pays a third of that there is no way Biden should have had anything at all to do with anything going on in the Ukraine.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2020
    James California likes this.
  24. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,312
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biden did NOT hold up aid to Ukrain. This is just a fact you cant escape, because he had no power over the money. NONE, NADA, ZILCH

    Really, nothing to do with Ukrain ? Then you also think that Ivanka should have nothing to do with China then right ?
     
  25. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,614
    Likes Received:
    17,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your wrong of course and he himself said do in the tape.
     

Share This Page