"He could not work with them until they stopped investigating him!"

What pass are you talking about? Who are you, kid? What gives you the idea that you can make crap up about who I give a pass to?

If by "this" you mean as you then you are absolutely correct.

 

This was just another instance of Trump throwing a hissy fit then staging an event to blame the other guy for his inability to govern. Trump alway needs a foil and a scape goat. This time it was Schumer, Pelosi, and the Democratic Party as usual. Trump has now crafted a perfect alibi for his inability to work with Congress, they hurt my feelings so I'll take my ball and go home.

Every president has faced opposition by the opposite party. Republicans hated Obama and McConnell said his main mission was to make Obama a one term president. Trump thinks he was elected king - no compromise, no oversight, no Congressional and Judicial Branch, and no Constitution. It vexes him that those other two Branches won't do it his way.

Trump has an option, run the country or run a country club. Clearly, he has made his choice. When you're in a position of power, you don't throw hissy fits when you're opposition exercises oversight, its Constitutional duty. Duty. The only "serious" feature of this latest stunt is that it allowed Trump to take center stage for another 24 hours. Again.

 

And Pudloadcy's disrupting and disorderly outburst is in your Opinion "Okie dokie", well good to see hypocrisy is alive, well and stronger then ever!

 

I hate admitting this stuff on here because the lefties in this forum NEVER admit when their side is wrong but I have to say this seems like a bad move for the Trumpster.
He is basically stooping to their level on this one. Does he lose my support? Heck no but I'm definitely doing a face palm right now.

 

The true people out to divide the nation is the extreme left. They do not serve their constituents, but some have made it their sole purpose of being in congress is to thwart and hunt Trump. At least Trump is working on Policies and trying to make changes regardless if we don't agree with all of them. The extreme left only work on personal agenda's and hate.

 

Ill patiently wait for a single post you can source from you over the course of the last 3 years in which you criticize the democrats for their attacks on Trump. Just one.

You know you won't be able to source that, so let's not even pretend.

 

Chuck and Nancy don't need Trump to write and pass a bill. Go try some legislation. If the two houses can agree on it, Trump is likely to sign it. But you see, Chuck and Nancy aren't interested in legislation. They are focused on bringing down Trump. Trump simply pointed that out to them in his own inimitable way. It is intensely entertaining, however.

 

Cost of Muller's investigation; $35 million

Number of U.S. households; 126 million +

126 million +/35 million; $3.65

Average household costs PER DAY; ONE CENT!

Here are all of the indictments, guilty pleas and convictions from Robert Mueller's Investigation;

https://news.yahoo.com/indictments-guilty-pleas-convictions-robert-223811579.html

Average household costs PER DAY; ONE CENT!

Waste of money???????

 

I'm sorry, did you see the whole report? Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Trump complain one day how Mueller is the pockets of Democrats and the next say there is nothing to find here?
ln point of fact, Mueller did find evidence of collusion, just not to a criminal extent but.....BUT he also has said that Trump clearly obstructed justice.

 

No he didn't........but also not the point.

 

and yet Robert Mueller did not recommend indictment as a response. Not because policies prohibit such, as there is no policy against recommending an indictment. No, what Robert Mueller did was troll absolutely everyone on both sides of the political spectrum. By claiming there was evidence of obstruction, he placed the burden of responsibility on the liberal democrat party, essentially telling them to put their careers on the line if they wish to pursue an indictment.

 

Yeah... Me too. I wish there were an attack that I could jump up and call ..."an exaggeration" or something. But no... Trump is actually all those things ...

Read my sig (NB*). Memorize it. Never forget it! Those who have forgotten have done so to their own demise (argumentatively speaking, of course)

 

Then what is your point?

 

So you havent found one single thing negative to say about how the Democrat Congress reacts to Trumps position, yet you think Trump should be all rainbow and unicorns with them? **** that. Snowflakes need to learn people aren't going to bow down to asshattery simply because snowflakes are in love with their opinions.

If Congress wants to act like a bunch of d-bags, then they get the same response and rightfully so.

 

Wait.....in one post you say Mueller found nothing and now you say he found obstruction. You want it both ways

 

Again you are off the mark.......the question was, what is your point.

 

The speaker here did

 

The speaker here said he is involved in a cover up. That would appear to be so, now the pressure is on her to prove it. Can you prove she is lying like you said she is?

 

Yes she falsely accused him of a cover up. Appear? hahaha there is nothing to cover up...the Mueller Report was made public...he never once tried to keep his staff or anyone from talking with Mueller...not once.

Wait...I'm suppose to prove a negative? She made the obviously false accusations...

 

It's only a negative in your mind.....and Trumps.

 

Well actually you said it was in your post. You said she said it, and it's yet to be proven, but then asked me to prove that she's lying even though she made the accusations.

I can easily prove it, by the simple fact Mueller found no obstruction, and secondly Trump never even used executive priv during the investigation...and allowed his staff to fully cooperate with the team. There was nothing to cover up.

 

Mueller's report DID find obstruction and put it to Congress to take it up. Congress is still waiting for the unredacted report. Trump never used executive privilege but threatened to all the time and was told it would not hold up. Unlike Clinton, he never testified himself.
So you say she's lying but actually have no proof of it at all.....other than opinion. I, on the other hand, say she now has to back up her claim. There's a difference.

 

Incorrect, the Conclusion Section, clearly states that they did not conclude a crime was committed.

They can wait all they want, but the Grand Jury stuff will not be released until they move a Federal Court to do so, under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 6(E). They have made no steps...there is a reason for that....they know 1) they won't get a Judge to agree 2) it's better to whine then accept the truth.

Clinton never testified to Starr or his team. He gave a deposition in a civil case, that he fought against all the way to the SCOTUS. Threatening to do something, isn't actually doing it...he made his entire staff and campaign staff wildly available.

She's lying, and falsely accusing him, because he didn't cover up anything...like I said, he made his staff and campaign widely available...it's all in the report.

 

No evidence was actually found, certainly nothing that would ever sustain an indictment. Robert Mueller merely claimed to have found evidence.

 

He has to answer for it at the polls.