Here's how Elizabeth Warren would change Social Security

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Pollycy, Sep 21, 2019.

  1. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The smartest Democrat alive today? Here's how Elizabeth Warren would change Social Security

    Links:
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/09/19/elizabeth-warren-social-security-policies/40146709/
    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/12/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-social-security.html
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/eli...curity-benefits-financed-by-wealth-taxes.html

    I have been saying for over a month that at some point, some Democrat candidate is going to wake up and realize that there are 70,000,000 Baby Boomers out here, who are receiving their earned Social Security benefit (or will begin collecting it soon). And the obvious truth is that Social Security benefits have not had a decent cost-of-living increase in TEN YEARS. In three of those years, there was no increase at all! Look for yourself --

    [​IMG]

    As a Right-wing Conservative, I don't like any Democrat candidate -- BUT -- I must admit that Warren is either orders of magnitude smarter than any of her competitors, or else she's simply the first of her faction to understand that the EASY way to win the nomination and the election in 2020 is to energize Baby Boomers, who are huge in numbers, and are a group of voters who are famous for never failing to vote in a presidential election!

    I don't like Warren or any of her other policies, but as a 'Boomer' myself, I have to say -- she's identified a concrete area where a huge number of people have been getting SCREWED, and she has taken a no-bullshit stand to actually DO something about it!

    If all she does is use this ONE issue consistently, loudly, and successfully, she'll win the 2020 election! You heard it here first -- FROM A STAUNCH CONSERVATIVE! :cynic:
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2019
  2. Mrlucky

    Mrlucky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    3,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Thedimon

    Thedimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    8,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    3E07C669-EA08-466A-8D9E-2FDC5D4BA620.png


    She is far from smartest.
    She promises retirees more social security, student loan borrowers forgiveness of their debts and reparations to black people.
    Her strategy is simple - free sh!t to everyone at the expense of the taxpayers and increased debt.

    I’m not voting for this garbage.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2019
    Starjet, Mrlucky, ArchStanton and 2 others like this.
  4. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The tax is not regressive.
     
  5. Distraff

    Distraff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    10,833
    Likes Received:
    4,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But she is promising the rest of us a social security tax increase, which means I actually like the status quo more than her proposal. An even smarter plan is to not raise the social security tax and remove the cap on income that can be taxed. Another problem is that people might start seeing her platform as just throwing free money to people to get their votes, and she hasn't always given straight answers as to how she is going to pay for it all.
     
    Starjet likes this.
  6. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh no! You will need to pay more to keep my Social Security checks going.
     
  7. The Wyrd of Gawd

    The Wyrd of Gawd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    Likes Received:
    3,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Will that old buzzard Pelosi support Warren's plan?
     
  8. Distraff

    Distraff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    10,833
    Likes Received:
    4,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I'm definitely not going to vote for that. If Warren is the nominee, I might consider keeping Trump around.
     
  9. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,355
    Likes Received:
    9,749
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What is a Social Security cheque? On what basis do you get one?
     
  10. Libby

    Libby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    8,000
    Likes Received:
    14,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Great. More promises of free sh*t to buy votes from one group, which another group has to pay for :roll:
     
    Starjet and JET3534 like this.
  11. opion8d

    opion8d Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    5,864
    Likes Received:
    4,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I recently posted some numbers showing the costs of Warren's proposal to increase Social Security payments by $2,000 a month for 64 million retirees currently getting payment on SS. It came out to $153 billion/year. Half that for a $1,000 bump. The comments I received were not what I expected. A summary follows.

    1. Warren has explained exactly how she would pay for this through legislation on taxes, mostly on the super-rich.
    2. Most responders viewed the proposal positively.
    3. Most felt that Americans on Social Security have been cheated for decades.
    4. Cutting the military budget was a favorite target to raise revenue.
    5. The economic impact of a $2,000/month increase for fixed income people would be huge because recipients would spend it immediately.
    6. Trump's tax cuts were far more expensive to the budget.

    After reviewing the results of my little survey, I began rethinking my position on Warren's idea. In short, I believe you are correct that this would be a game changer in the election and would likely ensure a Warren win. "All" she has to do is get it through Congress. Her numbers look good. 64,000,000 votes is a lot of votes and I suspect Warren would capture most of them.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2019
    Marcotic, Sallyally and Derideo_Te like this.
  12. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wow, why dont you just say that you want **** others pay for? Would have been quicker
     
  13. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Making over $250K is super-rich now?
     
  14. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And look at all of the leeches supporting it
     
  15. Capt Nice

    Capt Nice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    9,998
    Likes Received:
    10,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you support trump please don't criticize any one else for being a liar. It shows your degree of intelligence.
     
    Ericb760 likes this.
  16. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,703
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't like Warren either, but when you look at the size of the Boomer population it would be crazy to hold them to an income that barely pays the bills. That's like taking 70 million consumers out of the economy.

    With a shrinking population of consumers, the Millennials would have to open the borders and allow more immigration. :)
     
  17. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ah, ha! Excellent point! And it is the 'reason-within-the-reason' that the central banks and other real power-brokers in our economy would welcome a significant (and long-overdue) increase in Social Security to compensate for tens of millions of beneficiaries getting next to nothing for ten long years. Spending, and the inflation factor that goes hand-in-hand with it is exactly what the central bankers WANT!

    The central bankers have been going crazy trying to 'stimulate' inflation, and the growth that goes with it, back up to 'normal' levels. The Federal Reserve's snail-slow, anemic efforts at raising interest rates were just beginning to work when Trump launched his own 'jihad' on the Fed, demanding rate cuts, as though something was wrong with our economy. So, now the Fed has cut rates this year -- twice already -- for no reason at all, except maybe to help Europe, which appears to be going into another recession (?).

    Long story short -- millions and millions of Baby Boomers are getting screwed on the interest they get on their savings accounts and CD's -- and -- they've been getting screwed on cost-of-living increaes in Social Security. Although generally a 'conservative' group, Boomers are not stupid -- they've seen the prices charged for everything from houses, cars, rent, medicine, medical services, etc., etc., increase dramatically over the past ten years. NOW -- is it just possible that somebody running for president... even somebody like 'Dizzy Lizzy' Warren, can get TRACTION with Boomer voters by promising to correct this situation...? YOU BET IT IS!

    Suggestion to President Trump: Understand that there are MILLIONS of Americans who got little or nothing from your big 'tax-cut' a couple of years ago. A lot of them are Baby Boomers, and if you give them to the Democrats, you are going to lose the next election!

    [​IMG]. "
    How about it, Donald -- do you want to be a one-term president, too?"
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2019
    Sallyally and Derideo_Te like this.
  18. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hey, if it puts a Democrat in the Oval Office, why wouldn't Pelosi support Warren's plan?

    Honestly, if I were running for president, I'd see this kind of plan for increased benefits to millions of people who have EARNED them as the most obvious, low-hanging-fruit that could insure my own election.

    Another hint to my fellow Conservatives on the Right: not everbody in this country has run back into the stock market casinos after the 2008 series of disasters that wiped out millions of Americans, just when they were 10 - 15 years away from retirement. But stock market gamblers appear to be the ONLY ones that Trump has cared about. But, hey, there's ONLY about 70,000,000 Boomers.... Trump can win re-election without them... right...? :cynic:
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2019
    Ericb760, Sallyally and Derideo_Te like this.
  19. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Like we are having to do with little to no benefit on increased military spending?
    Jaunts to trump hotels?
    Weekly golf trips?
    The wall that Mexico isn’t paying for?

    Why not divert spending to help Americans?
     
    Saganist, mdrobster, Ericb760 and 2 others like this.
  20. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FDR instituted Social Security as a means to keep retirees from falling into poverty after they could no longer work for a living.

    There is a six percent deduction from your paycheck and a matching amount from your employee paid over the the SS administration. Out of those funds anyone who reaches full retirement age of 66 is entitled to a SS check. It you retire at 62 your check is reduced and if you retire at 70 it is increased proportionally.

    Everyone who has worked 40 quarters is entitled to SS and the benefit payout is based upon your top earnings over 30 years.
     
  21. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't want that spending. And I don't want your money like you want mine
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2019
  22. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But you want folks to pay disproportionately without increased benefit
     
  23. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does it matter if you spend a $trillion dollars on military spending or a $trillion on social security payments when you don't have the money for either?

    At least the $trillion on social security payments goes right back into the local economy as it's spent for living ... the new tank sits in a garage with continual maintenance costs and ads zero to the local economy except around the defense contractors neighborhoods.
     
  24. smalltime

    smalltime Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Dear God,
    Please let the nominee be Warren.........Pleeeeaaase
    Also Please let the democrats impeach Trump.....Pleeeeeaaase
     
    nra37922 likes this.
  25. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have paid into it for over 49 years. If all of that money had been put into a savings account, it would be worth at least $5000.00 a month by now. If Warren wants to give people like me a well deserved cost of living bump, I am all for it. Not free ****, earned payment.
     
    Chester_Murphy and Derideo_Te like this.

Share This Page