Herschel Walker Paid for Girlfriend’s Abortion, Report Says

I know that the guards are on duty all day and that there is only one way in/out. This is an actual solution that will keep kids safe.

My question was not to misdirect, but to understand your position. There are forum members and many liberals that support an all out gun ban. That means only cops and military have guns. The other extreme would be privately owned nukes. Where do you draw the line?

 

A classic case of actions betraying rhetoric. Conservatives want to be able to attack Dems for slavery while simultaneously embracing the identity politics & grievance pedalling of the 'lost cause'. Hmmmmm. I feel like the actions are telling us the truth here.

Yet another example of the utter contempt conservatives have for historical fact. It is always about politics. Always.

 

Hillary Clinton is a hypocrite. Did you vote for her? Joe Biden is a hypocrite. How about him? Did you give him your vote knowing he's a hypocrite?

 

GAWD HE LIED. I pointed it out, blacks (and some Native American's) WERE US citizen's. He was a grifter, which is why you support his BS

 

To you, they all sound good. Or you can list a few you haven't bought into.
Which would be ZERO

Oh, So you were a Trump supporter until you decided Trump was a fornicator, liar, hypocrite, cheat, and sex predator extraordinaire some months or years down the road?
Didn't know that.

Yes they do. But only the ones the left cherish.

 

Got it, you'll argue a point NOT argued

RACIST SCOTUS:
“The African race in the United States even when free are every where a degraded class, and exercise no political influence.” He went on, “They were not looked upon as citizens by the contracting parties who formed the Constitution,” and were “not supposed to be included by the term citizens.”


Except they were

"...The Chief Justice stated that colored persons were not, at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, citizens under the laws of the several States and the laws of the civilized world. But he knew, for it had been shown to him in the arguments, that such persons, and many who had been slaves, were then citizens in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and North Carolina, as they likewise were in Vermont, Pennsylvania, and in other States. And he knew—for in 1831 he himself said it was “a fixed principle of the law of England, that a slave becomes free as soon as he touches her shores”—that he declared as law what was not the law of civilized nations; that in 1762 Lord Northington declared that “as soon as a man sets foot on English ground he is free”; and that Lord Mansfield had, in 1772, held that “Slavery is so odious that it cannot be established without positive law.” He knew (or he declared what he did not know) that at that day the sentiment in France was so directly to the contrary, that in 1791 the law was “Tout individu est libre aussitôt qu'il est en France.” At the time to which he referred, public opinion in the American States and in foreign countries, and the legislation of the various States, were just the opposite of what he stated them to be. Liberty was just at that moment more truly the sentiment of the country and of states in amity with it than at any other. The assertion, that colored persons could not be and were not citizens of the several States, was simply false."

 

I did not care about her husband's consensual affair, it's the right claiming to be the family values party, as long as they admit they are not, who care

the right is the ones that claims they can't sell cakes to gays, can't sell pizza, ect.... seems they have no real moral issues with anything, especially after the Orange Stain

 

Liar

Hollywood Walk of Fame

kelsey grammer
Bill Cunningham
James Woods
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Clint Eastwood
Tim Allen
Michael Bay
Pat Boone
James Caan
Drew Carey
Mel Gibson
Patricia Heaton
Chuck Norris
Pat Sajak


This is a few of the right wing idiots on the walk

 

Your opinion has nothing to do with leftist Hollywood idols. You don't get a Star unless they give it to you.
But again, you were the one who thought the right loves Hollywood celebs.
So theres that. No surprise here. lol

 

You kinda havre a history of leaving out stuff?

Context to your posit

With a need for more soldiers, the Confederacy established a draft. The Germans did not want to fight against the Union and objected to being drafted. Buildup to this event began in the spring of 1862 with the initiation of a Confederate conscription for Texans, to which many German Texans voiced their objection.

The Confederate Conscription Act of 1862 turned general German objection into open opposition. Because of this opposition, General Hamilton Bee dispatched Captain James Duff to Gillespie County. In late May 1862, Captain Duff imposed martial law. While in Gillespie County, Captain Duff arrested and executed two Germans.

The harsh conduct convinced several Germans to leave Texas. Frederick "Fritz" Tegener and his Union Loyal League associates planned a departure. Their goal was to enter Mexico, and then to make their way to Union-controlled New Orleans

THEN YOUR POSIT

Flight and battle
Between August 1, and August 3, 1862, sixty-one German Texans, led by Fritz Tegener, departed from Turtle Creek headed southwest for the Mexican border.Informed of their intentions, Captain Duff dispatched Lieutenant Colin McRae with approximately 96 men in pursuit on August 3, 1862
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nueces_massacre

YOU KINDA LEFT OUT CONTEXT THERE RIGHT? LOL

 

It Turns Out Christians Have More Abortions Than Any Other Religious Group In America
A survey by a Christian research group suggests 70 percent of women who've had an abortion identify as Christian.

https://www.mtv.com/news/htq731/lifeway-christian-research-christians-have-most-abortions

 

Did you care that Bill Clinton lied though while under oath?

Truly, I think you overuse the broad brush when it comes to right leaning voters.

 

Says Raphael Warnock "ran over his wife" and was "arrested for obstructing an investigation into child abuse."



https://www.politifact.com/factchec...of-warnock-ran-over-wife-obstruction-case-dr/

 

Talk to the woman he tried to run over. Have you ever listened to her? What happened to women are supposed to be believed?

 

LMAOROG, You mean the Grand Wizard that popularized it and led it wasn't racist?

"If we ain't fightin' to keep slavery, then what the hell are we fightin' for?" Forrest reportedly said

„I am opposed to it under any and all circumstances, and in our convention urged our party not to commit themselves at all upon the subject.“ — Nathan Bedford Forrest Regarding black voting, as quoted in Report of the Joint Select Committee

Source: https://quotepark.com/authors/nathan-bedford-forrest/

While noting that change before his death in 1877, many historians argue those actions are too little too late for the Confederate general and Ku Klux Klan leader.

"The wrongs committed by great men tend to be as large as the men themselves, and Forrest's were appropriately titanic," Hurst wrote in his biography.
https://www.tennessean.com/story/ne...o-know-about-nathan-bedford-forrest/29217861/

We Don’t Have Enough Contempt for Nathan Bedford Forrest

Slave trading was not for the morally sensitive, but Forrest stood out even among slave-traders in his oppression of his human property. In January of 1860 his “Slave Mart” collapsed in a heavy rain, “burying beneath its ruins six valuable slaves,” killing at least two. He was also certainly the source of an article published in January of 1859 claiming that he was in possession of a daughter of “Fred Douglass.” Emphasizing that she was “of the class known among the dealers as a ‘likely girl,’” Forrest cruelly noted her vulnerability to rape. The article called out Douglass for hypocrisy in failing to purchase her. We can assume that she was not actually a daughter of Douglass: Forrest loved to overawe. Even when it came to depravity, his big talk frequently outran his big actions. Forrest was trying to degrade and insult Douglass. Yet this reveals him as man eminently comfortable with, and indeed playful about, the fact that selling girls to men who would rape them was his business.

Forrest was also responsible for the notorious Fort Pillow Massacre of April 12, 1864, which earned him the title “the butcher Forrest.” After Forrest’s soldiers breached the understaffed fort, they massacred black, and some white, defenders of the fort as they attempted to surrender. Though there is some doubt about the details of the atrocities (Did Forrest’s soldiers really nail two men to boards and throw them into the flames? Did they really coolly gun down three teenaged non-combatants who had attempted to hide in the river near the shore? How many wounded men did they actually bury alive in a mass grave or set on fire?), there is no question the massacre occurred, nor that killings of unarmed and injured men extended for many hours after the fighting ended. Many survivors testified to it, an army surgeon testified that the wounds he encountered were unlike any he had seen before in their close range and accuracy, the unnaturally high casualty rate was heavily skewed towards black soldiers, and there was a much higher proportion of dead to wounded soldiers than in normal combat. Forrest’s level of responsibility for his soldiers’ brutality is contested: he may not have intended all that occurred. But he was a decisive leader in charge of a terrible atrocity. According to anecdotes circulated by his supporters, he even joked about the event in later years, claiming that his men ate the black soldiers and he ate the murdered babies himself for breakfast.


... To quote historian Carole Emberton, “If there is one thing more despicable than being the leader of the Klan, it is falsely claiming to be the leader of the Klan.”

Why, then, is public objection to Forrest primarily focused on his role in as leader of the Klan, as though his much more sustained, direct, and verifiable roles as a slave trader, war criminal, and private perpetrator of violence are not damning enough?


„Negro soldiers cannot cope with Southerners“ — Nathan Bedford Forrest Regarding the Fort Pillow massacre, as quoted in Personal Memoirs, by U.S. Grant, (Library of America, 1990), p. 483. Context: The river was dyed with the blood of the slaughtered for two hundred yards. The approximate loss was upward of five hundred killed, but few of the officers escaping. My loss was about twenty killed. It is hoped that these facts will demonstrate to the Northern people that Negro soldiers cannot cope with Southerners.

 

Uvalde, Buffalo Shootings Expose the Myth of the ‘Good Guy With a Gun’
The NRA has a romantic notion that a ‘good guy with a gun’ could stem mass shootings. In reality, it hasn’t worked out like that.
https://www.usnews.com/news/the-rep...gs-expose-the-myth-of-the-good-guy-with-a-gun


A top Texas law enforcement official said that there were enough armed police officers wearing body armor to stop the late May shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, three minutes after it began.

But instead, it took about an hour and 14 minutes from when officers arrived at the school to when they breached the door and ended the standoff with the gunman.

https://www.npr.org/2022/06/21/1106372103/uvalde-shooting-timeline-3-minutes-pete-arredondo

 

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

Your premise was the "left" loved Diaper Donnie until he ran as a Repugnant. I believe that's false. Yes some people interviewed him because he says outrageous crap, but look how he had to start his own club because most people who have values, knew he was a POS

 

• Police found no evidence that Warnock ran over his estranged wife’s foot with his car.
  

Warnock called police to Ndoye’s Atlanta home shortly before 8:30 a.m. on March 2. According to a police report:

Warnock said Ndoye accused him of running over her left foot with his 2014 Tesla while they were arguing in her driveway. Ndoye was reluctant to show her foot to the officer, who wrote: "I did not see any signs that Ms. Ouleye’s foot was ran over." Medical personnel arrived and were "not able to locate any swelling, redness, or bruising or broken bones on Ms. Ouleye’s left foot."
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...of-warnock-ran-over-wife-obstruction-case-dr/

 

For the love of god read something instead of just blindly quoting stuff from propagandists.

This is his opinion:


The question is simply this: Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen? One of which rights is the privilege of suing in a court of the United States in the cases specified in the Constitution....

We think [people of African ancestry] are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States..

They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery. . . . He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race.

For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went. And all of this would be done in the face of the subject race of the same color, both free and slaves, and inevitably producing discontent and insubordination among them, and endangering the peace and safety of the State.

 

Sorry, but you misunderstood my meaning, which us that under normal circumstances, none of this is anyone else's business, and I did include that it was her choice to make it public. People don't seem logical on this whole story, not on either "side."

 

https://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

'In 2014, 30% of aborting women identified themselves as Protestant and 24% identified themselves as Catholic (AGI)."

these two groups of Christians alone are over 50%

"Religious school grads likelier to have abortions"

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/heal...l-grads-likelier-have-abortions-flna1C9437875

 

You fought in the Civil War?

 

Wait. They're the same people? Vampires?

 

I don't care what he did in 2009. I care about how he's going to vote in future. I feel confident he will vote conservative.

These types of hit jobs from the left has been overdone. No one finds credibility with any of it.