Hillary a liar? When? Where? How? Inform us.

Asking if Hillary is a liar, If so, where? when? is just like asking if the New York Yankees ever won a World Series? If so, where? when?

 

Watch her lips. When she is lying they move.

 

Really? You don't say? That's funny, because the senate bi-partisan committee concluded that the video could have very likely been the cause of the attack. Since that is the case, how can Hillary be lying then?

She didn't have to. All she would have needed to do was check the senate bi-partisan report.

 

Right there proves just how weak the Right is with this argument. You folks are all about the hate and that's it. "Watch her lips". Go get em tiger. What a joke.

 

What accomplishments? You mean when she landed under sniper fire? LMFAO.

 

Have you proven that? The senate bi-partisan investigative committee doesn't agree with you that it is a lie. How do you know it is a lie?

 

And the Yankees have not won that many World Series. There have not been that many World series.

 

She isn't funny enough to be a joke.

 

I am amazed that when something is all over the WORLD news, there is even a single person out there that isn't aware of the ongoing charges of sabotage, subversion, money laundering and lying by those two Clinton traitors. The proof remains in the hands of the FBI, so you will have to wait for the final disclosure. Yet, it is scary enough that Bill recently made a b-line to confront Lynch when he knew they were the final targets of the investigation, not just Hillary but Bill and Obama as well! And people still wear bags on their heads. Even the liberal media is growing horrified. The dots are not difficult to connect. And they've been leaving a trail of dots for three decades.

I'm also amazed that die-hard Clinton lovers slather on the compliments like "accomplishments". Hillary is wearing some nice suites these days, but she isn't dressing herself and they cost about $16,00 apiece, so they should be nice. You want to judge a book by the cover? The entire notion of her foreign policy experience is based more on vague impressions than reality. What matters above all, as Obama rightly insisted in 2008, is judgment, not experience. In the case of Clinton, there hasn't been a major foreign policy decision in the Middle East she pushed for that didn't end up being a disaster at home and in the countries involved. What a giant mess our world is in -- so much worse than 8 years ago!

You asked to be informed? Are you aware that the Paris shooter carried a gun provided by Hillary's state department's "Fast and Furious" gun running scheme in Libya? http://www.commdiginews.com/entertainment/did-isis-use-operation-fast-and-furious-guns-in-paris-attack-66508/ How about Clinton saying "What difference does it make?" in response to interrogation on lives lost in Benghazi, where she lied to Americans saying the cause was a video. It's there on your television, on the radio -- just take your fingers out of your ears and stop singing La-la-la-la.

Do you want to know... really?
If, as psychologists say, “The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior,” then a fresh look at the top 20 scandals involving Hillary is in order.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/here-they-are-hillarys-22-biggest-scandals-ever/#iq8PZkE4bcA2Q5l2.99

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/10/hillary-clintons-favors-to-foundation-donors-stret/


Crickets.

 

You aren't aware that it is a lie? You are not getting your information from good sources. The select committee came to the conclusion that it was a lie.

 

Regulations which are there to embody the law and if you were using your private email to conduct company business yes you could get fired as those communications are the proeperty of the company and

Surprise! Archiving Email is Required by Law

Are you breaking the law by not archiving business email?

You may be required by law to archive emails. Some industries have strict federal guidelines on storing email communications (financial institutions, for example). But what you may not realize is that your business – like any other business must comply with the Federal Regulations on Civil Procedures (FRCP). The amendments to the FRCP have been enforced for over 6 years now, since December 1, 2006. FRCP mandates that companies must be prepared for electronic discovery.(*) You – your company or organization –(*) must meet these requirements:

you must know where your business data is stored
you must know how to retrieve it on demand;
you must know how to meet data requests;
in addition it must determine what data will not be subject to search.
http://www.powersolution.com/surprise-archiving-email-is-required-by-law/

 

[video=youtube;-dY77j6uBHI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI[/video]

Watch for yourself.

 

http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/01/15/fox-benghazi-myths-dispelled-by-new-bipartisan/197609 I've already linked this one time before. Is there something about reading comprehension you don't get?

 

And..........

She destroyed eMail that weren't turned over and only found in the eMails of her underlings.

 

It's true that Trump is more of a pathological liar while Hillary is a calculating one. I'm not sure in what way they are neck and neck though, unless you're just trying to sound unpartisan. When it comes to quantity though, Trump is the clear winner.

Not correct. Trump lies much more. Whether that makes him worse is up for debate though as his lies are mindless and idiotic while Clinton's are calculating. When it comes to the world stage I'd prefer ruthless over stupid.

Clinton has 26% of statements mostly false or worse. A low bar to be sure. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

But 77% of Trump's statements are mostly false or worse. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

So that's why I cringe when Trump calls.... anyone.... a liar.

 

Hillary was labeled a congenital liar in the 90's by William Safire. She has not changed.

The Hilary campaign is trying to obfuscate with more lies about Trump.

What would you expect from left wing Politifact?

 

77% of the statements that Trump makes are demonstrably and provably false. Doesn't that bother you? I agree that Clinton is the typical politician which makes her pretty slippery, but Trump is a pathological liar. Several of his GOP opponents pointed this out point blank in the primaries, so you can't blame the "liberal media" for painting him with that brush. He has earned his reputation for being a lying swindler throughout his life.

 

How many of Trumps are about handling national security issues, official government acts or in answer to federal supenas?

 

HillBill is certainly dishonest, but when compared to Trump she's an angel...then again Trump does not lie so much as flip statements.

 

While that's a very convenient explanation for you to suggest, I see no evidence that the discrepancy is based upon politifact favoring Clinton over Trump.

 

Meh. Not proven. Hillary is a congenital liar. The lib media has her back.

- - - Updated - - -

A lib media outlet favoring Hilldebeast? Say it ain't so.

 

Media Matters is a group of democrat hacks. Perhaps you could narrow it down and cite something out of that instead of providing no rebuttal and just a website link? Anyone can post a link to a website, but is it relevant?

 

I think the better question would be, perhaps you could? Lol! That'll be the day. I presented my truth and evidence hot shot. Now you're up to bat to prove my link wrong.

 

Sorry, I read about the first 10 pages and didn't see anything exculpatory.

What part of your link was right? Perhaps you can quote from it?

 

Under a Big Fat Rock you reside.......