Yes it does, because she abused her position at the State Department to allow the Russians to buy nuclear materials from the US and Canada and in return she got $500,000.00. Read the story. Nah-ah is not a reasonable refutation of facts.
Well thanks! You just admitted to not telling the truth by changing the story, that "she allowed the Russians to buy nuclear materials". That is certainly not the same thing as "she sold them nuclear materials". And, "Clinton using her position at the state department" is nothing more than an opinion you are using to justify not telling us all the truth, that "she sold nuclear material to the Russians". Again, you are just a story teller, triggered by your own hate.
I don't make excuses for the stupidity of readers, I can only say that if you have read the article, it explains how corrupt Hillary Clinton and her sexual predator husband Bill used their power to give nuclear materials for their own personal gain. Word it however you want, it's still true. That is not my opinion, that is the story in the New York Times.
Oh, so now it's "give nuclear materials"? With so many different tall tales, no wonder I'm having so much trouble picking one of these stories to like the most. Lol! What a joke.
Oh, you are so good at dissecting the New York Times article. They are such a bunch of liars. What a ridiculous story. Of course she didn't give them nuclear materials. She sold out America for $500,000.00
Euuuw! Gross. - - - Updated - - - There are, undoubtedly, "thousands and thousands" of eye witnesses in Jersey.
When Hillary Clinton speaks about her policy ideas, it's always nothing but clichés and platitudes. "We can do this together". " Instead of building walls, we should build bridges". Liberals fall for that stuff
intelligent people buy it, because it's true [video=youtube;0lKlJ3Ed4fQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lKlJ3Ed4fQ[/video]
No one of even average intelligence buys anything she says. We have two unacceptable buffoons to choose from. It's a sad commentary on our current state of affairs.
No they don't. Obama took our traditional allies and hung them out to dry. America is less respected today than we were eight years ago. For the last seven and a half years, we have been led by possibly the most incompetent and indecisive president in US history. Things aren't looking any better in the near future either. We are in serious trouble.
that's ridiculous, no wonder she's doing so well you don't know what you're talking about "Globally, Obama’s image is mostly positive. Across the 40 countries polled, a median of 65% say they have confidence in Obama to do the right thing in world affairs. A median of just 27% lack confidence in the American leader. Overall, Obama remains much more popular globally than his predecessor, but opinions vary significantly across nations and regions." http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/24/7-charts-on-how-the-world-views-president-obama/
Shes doing well? She's up against perhaps the biggest buffoon ever to run for president and she can't dismiss him after he's had a horrible couple of weeks.