How does black and brown diversity benefit white run societies?

“If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin.” - Charles Darwin

If these statistics were caused by racism then the problem isn't Black and Brown people. Instead of looking at Multiracial societies as a problem perhaps you should be looking at how to make society more fair and equal.

 

We need to encourage white racist emigration. Too bad nobody else wants white supremacists either.

 

You don't?

 

The world?

I am talking about white Americans.

What bizarro world do you live in where it is a bad thing, when an entire group of people vote against a group of people who broadcast their desires to oppress them and broadcast their anject hatred of them?

 

So so far, it's so we won't be insufferable, so we can devalue idiots, and to increase variety in your hookers.

All in all, not very good reasons in a thread that's run for 11 pages. Come on lefties! Can't you come up with real reasons?

So far, that's the only halfway decent answer I've seen. But can't we import only chicks in that case?

 

Why do that when certain groups aren't putting in equal work? How is that "fair"? Blacks have a cultural problem they need to deal with, but instead of being responsible and working on it, they just blame whitey, because it's the easier option.

 

I asked if the majority of white people were stupid, and you said yes. I'm waiting for statistics on this argument.

List the part of the Republican Party platform where they "broadcast their desires to oppress them and broadcast their anject(sic) hatred of them".

Pro-tip - since you're new here, you might want to start substantiating your arguments. This isn't some progressive echo-chamber where liberals parrot a left-wing talking point and everyone just mindlessly agrees with them.

 

What argument have I dodged? You haven't made any arguments. You keep bringing up racism and not addressing the OP.

I'm not a white supremacist. I acknowledge the evidence that shows how races differ from one another, as opposed to denying it.

What does this have to do with anything?

If you libs are going to participate in the thread, then you need to start addressing the OP and stop trying to derail or reframe the conversation.

I never said there weren't black people smarter and more accomplished than myself, so you just wasted a paragraph saying absolutely nothing relevant.

 

I see no evidence the statistics in the OP were a result of racism.

In any event, like I said, even if black and browns do poorly in 'racist' white society, unlike whites and yellows, why would whites want more blacks and browns as opposed to importing more whites and yellows?

 

I'm still unaware what statistics show blacks performing on par with whites in Canada.

Perhaps extremely restricted immigration taking only the top 16% of blacks and browns is one able to get a 1st generation black and brown population on par with whites.

Unfortunately, due to regression toward the mean, their spawn will populate the bottom half of the bell curve.

 

Let's turn your question around: How do Black and Brown benefit from White run societies? Especially if the land belonged to Black or Brown people to begin with i.e. America, South Africa. Please answer.

 

Isn't that now called culture appropriation? a bad thing?

 

I can see an argument for land being own by indigenous peoples. The Aztecs took the land from the original owners. We took the land from the Aztecs. Who owns it? Most of the land in North America was uninhabited.

 

Uninhabited? Really? Let's tell that to the Sioux, Pawnee, Navajos, Cherokees, Chickasaws, Creeks, Seminoles, and I can't think of any others right now. That is funny.

 

Eventually the black and brown diversity overcomes the tyranny of white supremacy.

Overcoming tyranny is beneficial for any nation. Ending the tyranny of white supremacy is beneficial to black, brown, and white people alike and is only a disaster for the white supremacists.

 

What tyranny are blacks and browns experiencing that makes them more prone to violence and lowers their IQ, and how would whites benefit from ending this supposed tyranny?

Can you nane any black and brown nation run by blacks and browns that outperform white and yellow nations?

 

They don't. Blacks and browns live better in the paradise they left behind before inexplicably moving to whitr run nations.

 

Nationalism has actually become more prevalent in Europe, and America as a result of multiculturalism.

Destroying White people is evil, plain, and simple.

Replacing anyone is evil, plain, and simple.

But, obviously many Western Europeans think that's cool, they did so with natives, and now to themselves.

Talk about a great people, right. LOL

 

Yeah, really. Highest estimate of population of North America, what is now U.S. and Canada is 18 million and lowest is 2.1 million, before the arrival of the Europeans.

 

No. White Nationalism is becoming more prevalent because of racism by white supremacists. It's the rise of Aryan (white) supremacy in Europe once again that was the hallmark of Nazi Germany that resulted in the murder of 11 million innocent people. In America it's the same White Supremacy of the historic Southern states that's spread nationwide that resulted in slavery, segregation, racist lynchings and the oppression of millions of people of color. The KKK is historically America's #1 domestic terrorist organization responsible for far more murders than any other domestic or foreign terrorist organization.

This is potentially the worst development in human history as we abandon advancements in civilization achieved over the last 300 years and once again return to the barbarism of the dark ages.

While destroying non-white people is commendable, plain and simple? Is that the claim being made?

Any doctrine of supremacy regardless of whether it's religious supremacy, ethnic supremacy, gender supremacy, social supremacy, hereditary supremacy, or white supremacy is inherently tyrannical that results in the oppression and destruction of the non-supremacy people.

Ending all forms of supremacy where all people are equal in society brings to an end the destruction of any of the people in society including those that may have been the former (white) supremacists.

WTF is this supposed to mean? No one is replaced as a society becomes more diverse racially, culturally, or ethnically over time. Just because Baskin Robbins has 31 flavors doesn't mean it's replaced vanilla ice cream on its menu.

Personally I don't give a damn about Western European nations that are responsible for many of the worlds problems today that resulted from "White Supremacy" European colonialism in the past.

I care about the United States that was established based upon an ideology that expressly established that All People Are Created Equal where white supremacy has always violated the American political ideology. Arguably White (WASP) Male Supremacy in the United States has been the greatest barrier to advancing towards the government and society envision by the founders of America. The rights of everyone that wasn't a White (WASP) Male have been violated in this country since it was founded. It's been over 200 years since the highly progressive liberal ideology of equality for all people, regardless of race, religion, gender, heritage, social status or other invidious criteria based upon the natural rights of the person was established as the American ideology and the racist White Supremacists have been the greatest single barrier to ever achieving that goal. They're as "un-American" as anyone could possible be.

The ideology of oppression based upon White Supremacy has no place in America and it has never had any place in American since 1776. It has existed but it has no place here. Take this KKK inspired propaganda and shove it where the sun never shines.

 

We certainly want to be more like Sub-Saharan Africa.

 

Blacks and browns have always been subjected to the tyranny of White Supremacy in the United States, They're not more "prone to violence" but oppression often results results in more violence and there's no evidence they're less intelligent or have a lower IQ but instead all of the evidence indicates that the lower IQ tests scores are due to the oppression of White Supremacy.

We can also note that black and brown people have suffered worldwide because they were subjected to White Supremacy Western European Colonialism in the past.

Can you name any "black or brown" nation that hasn't been subjected to the oppression of White Supremacy in the past that can take hundreds of years to overcome? All of Africa was subjected to White Supremacy under European colonial rule and it will take hundreds of years for them to eventually overcome the negative impact of that oppression and the ideology of oppression that the European colonial governments taught them. The native people of North American, Central American, and South America were subjected to the murderous conquest and tyranny by White Supremacist Europeans and taught by these White Supremacists the ideology of oppression. When the White Supremacist Europeans came to the Americas they weren't teaching the native people about the natural rights of the person enumerated by John Locke in 1690. They were teaching them how to oppress "other" people as slaves and laborers to exploit and the White Supremacists destroyed the native cultures they encountered.

The White Supremacists destroyed the cultures of black and brown societies that have not recovered from that oppression. It is ironic that the "White Supremacist" wants us to look at the black and brown cultures they destroyed as evidence that black and brown cultures are not succeeding today because of the oppression of White Supremacy in the past.

Of course we also know why the White societies are doing better today and it's because of the exploitation of "non-whites" by the White Supremacist. The historic economic oppression of minorities around the world by White Supremacy resulted in an economic advantage for whites that continues unabated today. The argument by the White Supremacist is really that "White societies are doing better because historically the White Supremacists exploited and destroyed black and brown societies."

 

What evidence do you have that blacks have the same IQ and cognitive abilities as whites?

What oppression are blacks currently experiencing, and what evidence do you have that this lowers their IQ and makes them more prone to violence?

Why would whites want blacks moving into their country when yellows can move here instead and outperform whites?

 

Ethiopia has never be colonized. Sub-Saharan Africa is an open sewer because the average I.Q. of its people is 70.

 

Here you go. From CNN poll 9/13/2015:

The partisan divide is nearly as large, with 61% of Democrats saying Obama is a Protestant, vs. 32% of independents and 28% of Republicans. But the 43% of Republicans and 54% of Trump supporters who say they believe Obama is a Muslim is a smaller share than in other recent polling which asked only whether Obama is a Christian or a Muslim.

You have to be profoundly stupid to believe Obama is Muslim. And you have to be run of the mill stupid to not know he is Protestant.