How many times have I said the media is comprised of Democratic Party operatives?

He has a point. No one called everyone those things. That's YOUR interpretation of what happened, but not what actually happened.

 

No empirical data that proves the OP. Interesting theme but no dice so far.

 

Examine your logic here:

You equate a journalist telling another journalist to quash a story for the benefit of a political party with a president telling a network to quash a story.

This is a false equivalency; try again.

And why should you care? Because apparently we have what is supposed to be an unbiased journalist – someone who is supposed to scrutinize our political parties and keep them honest – instead working hand in hand with a political party to coordinate their propaganda.

 

Hahaha, OK. Propaganda then. Thanks...

 

We go round and round every time you come to play. You say nothing, prove nothing, and simply flap your lips.

Bye Jake...

 

Case in point:

See my new post here where Democratic Party operative Christiane Amanpour, who poses as an anchor for CNN, asked the corrupt Obama FBI Director James Comey why he and other federal government authorities didn't shut down the Hillary 'Lock her up' chants at Trump rallies:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...t-down-hillary-chants.553631/#post-1070412535

Aren't you leftists just a little worried about a media figure who wonders why government officials are not quashing free speech?

 

Provide the empirical data, M M, but you won't.

 

I did. Directly to you, as a matter of fact. You ignored it. Which is what you usually do. Not sure if you enjoy the troll or if you are simply not that bright.

Here it is again. Please tell me how liberal journalists bouncing back and forth between media jobs and Democratic Party political jobs is not evidence:

Glad to see you back for another round, Jake.

Read this, and tell me that biased journalists don't coordinate with the Democratic Party:

Time managing editor Rick Stengel is leaving journalism to go work for the State Department, making him at least the 24th reporter to go to work for the Obama administration.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...urnalist-go-work-obama-administration/310928/

This also occurs at the state and local level; in California, where I live, it's a revolving door between McClatchy/Sacrament Bee and Democratic Party jobs.

 

It's an opinion piece. Where is the empirical data?

 

You go on about an echo chamber, but you didn't answer my question, and you repeat tired BS "examples".

Enjoy your bubble.

 

She was never in danger. The left circles the wagons, except for poor old Stewart Smalley (Al Franken).

 

Was your question about Trump? Or was it about JournoList? If the latter, I read everything from Politico to leftwing media such as Salon to right wing media such as the Daily Caller (who broke the story, if you're not aware).

So, did you read both left and right wing media about the scandal? Even the leftist Atlantic thought it was somewhat untoward while still defending fellow leftists.

Are you going to defend this scandal? Or do you not have an opinion and don't care, as you do with the biased NBC editor?

 

Journalists move into and out of jobs for the Democratic Party and Democratic politicians; many of the 24 reporters I cited who went to work for the corrupt Obama administration have gone back to journalism.

Why are afraid to address this, Jake?

 

You are so biased and accusatory that I see no point in carrying on. You accuse me of living in a bubble, and of not caring, etc.

You obviously have your mind made up on the NBC editor and all of the media.

I said what I had to say in regard to that, but you either misinterpret it, or don't get it.

So, imo, someone who has their mind made up like that is the one "living in a bubble".

 

Hold your horses, friend.

You did say you didn't wish to form an opinion. Right?

Why? Aren't you just a tad curious why an NBC journalist was calling another journalist on behalf of the DNC?

You seem to quickly form opinions when it comes to other issues. For example, you immediately began equivocating about my OP but proudly displayed your obsession with Trump in this non-Trump thread.

This is what I meant about living in a bubble; you are quick to parrot opinions about bad orange man, but will sit on the sidelines when liberal/progressive/socialist media bias is on display.

I answered your question re the JournoList scandal, yet you remain silent over this, too. Why?

How about CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour and her interview of the corrupt Obama FBI Director James Comey? Are you even aware of this? It's only being talked about in right wing media, so you very well might be quite ignorant of her astonishing First Amendment views.

Unless you make an effort to expand your horizons beyond the leftist mainstream media, you are in an echo chamber. You don't see this?

Don't go away mad; I think we could have an interesting debate if you expand your reading material a bit...