How to stop Islamic Terrorism

whichever way we spin it, the beast is the warmonger. how to define the biggest warmonger?? imo its the one who makes all of the weapons, the one who spends most on weapons, the one who has weapons bases in the most countries and the one who is involved in the most wars. hands up, i accept that accusation and i want my people to change and i make that change by making that change in me. that is all i can do.

 

ha lol. i must say that it is very difficult for me to understand why a syrian would want to leave his/her rubble aka house and live in america. what is so bad about a bomb dropping in your garden every day huh. personally i would stay and fight america but then again going to live in your bombers country may be the best option for the future. i mean, who knows who america/russia is going to troll next, best just go to america innit

 

supply and demand

 

By bombing cities full of innocent people, aka MURDER.

 

Prove it or admit you're making stuff up.

 

You are on record in this thread wanting to wipe out islam. 25% of the world. That sounds like murder/genocide.

 

It's still racist.

 

It's not racist if I'm the same race. It's only racist if I am of a different race to asshat but we are both whites. It's more like intercine. It's a common occurrence in Europe today. Like good v evil has come about at last and the good (us) are calling out the demons in our race. Hey, I'm just using western language, you know we are big on race since we invented it and all

 

It has already been proven on this board ad nauseam; you apparently have not been paying attention. Look it up yourself.

 

You have brainwashed yourself into believing your own race is worse than any other, then, which is still a racist stance.

Britain was quite racist during its colonial period, but that is over now.

The US dropped racist practices in the 1960's or earlier, and reparations were informally paid in the form of welfare.

Few over here, except those who like to cause conflict, still believe or promulgate the idea that racism is a major factor in the US.

To the extent that various subgroups insist on drawing negative attention to themselves, of course some are still inclined to have negative perceptions at times. This is a result of how the mind works, not institutionalized policy.

 

That's not murder. That's war.

I don't believe I ever said that.

I did say that, "We need to wipe out this stupid religion and ideology." That is not to say that every one of them must be killed.

 

Institutionalised racism has been proven in a court of law and the fbi has proven that white racism has infilltrated the police. To doubt these facts is to submit to the brainwashing of these racist institutions that control western society. Play it down though, I expect that of course and I stay ahead of the game

 

Its murder, you can wrap a
Cotton wool round a turd but its still a turd

 

I don't pay attention typically to wild accusations.

- - - Updated - - -

I don't know how else you rid an ideology with guns.

 

I have considered the problem to the extent that I am satisfied that there is no intentional racism occurring.

If you wish to believe otherwise, go for it.

 

IMO we need to stop importing Muslims. As a group, they are trouble. For each 100 that enter the country, supposedly there will be one half a terrorist, or one whole terrorist for every 200 that enter.

The intent is to increase the Muslim population in the US to 6 million by 2030.

According to my calculations, that would amount to having imported 30 thousand potential terrorists by 2030.

IMO the easiest way to minimize Muslim terrorism in the US would be to minimize the immigration of Muslims into the country.

 

Speaking from experience?

It worked against the Nazis.

 

That's going beyond what I was saying.

What I was stating was about why ISIL exists in Syria and Iraq - why they exist at all.

Once ISIL exists, has bases of operation, recruits, wealth, objectives, etc., they can do all sorts of bad stuff.

I really don't know the reason why ISIL selected Paris for that well orchestrated crime. France has supported attacks in Iraq and Syria. France has done a poor job of allowing foreigners (including Americans, not just Syrians) to integrate in their society, and that has been a big problem for people who are trying to gain employment, etc. France, absolutely including Paris, has not followed our level of seeing people as equal under the law.

Was that enough? I do not know. And, France isn't the only country hit like that, obviously.

 

Well, Sadam attacked Kuwait during the Bush41 administration, and we drove them out. Bush41 determined that conquering Iraq would be a huge mistake, so he did not do that.

When his son was president, his case (and HIS decision) for conquering Iraq had nothing to do with Kuwait.

 

Nazism was attached to a state. That's not the case with radical Islam.

- - - Updated - - -

Any ideas on how to stop Western influence in the Middle East?

 

My understanding was that Bush II felt his Dad had been mistaken not to conquer Iraq so he was going to finish the job.

The general consensus of opinion now seems to be that the WMD issue was a lie to enable the attack.

 

Make it less profitable.

Eliminate the excuses to intervene.

Leave Israel and each other alone.

Cooperate instead of fighting.

Encourage a strong balance of power that respects and uses the powers of Iran, Turkey, Russia, and the Kurds as well as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc etc to keep peace.

Get the UN to accuse certain bad actors that stir up trouble with war crimes.

 

According to Obama, more gun control, maybe stop climate change.

 

I was hoping you were going to say to get out indefinitely. Of course, doing that will have you forfeit your place as a global superpower.

If you want to stay in the ME, you should solely play the role of the peacemaker, regardless if peace is impossible. Anything other than that, stay away, far away, unless you want to see the blowback that you are seeing today.

But perhaps it's too late for that.

 

IMO we lost our credibility as peacemaker when Bush II made his ill-advised attack on Iraq. Maybe Russia or another country could actually do a better job at this point?

A mere opinion that the US should withdraw from the Mideast is useless because it simply will not happen as long as those who wish to keep us in there have an excuse to do so.

IMO Obama's "treaty" with Iran at least staved off the attack of Iran that the same crowd had been agitating for for several years now. We just heard rumblings of it in the background of our media noise; that seems to have quieted down for now.

Someone outside of the US needs to identify some war criminals in the US and have them brought to trial to damp things down IMO. I don't know who they are but apparently they exist, and I doubt anyone in this country could successfully do it.

Fair is fair--if the Mideast still wants our help as a peacemaker, help us to peacefully identify and get rid of our own war mongers. Unprovoked acts of terror against innocent civilians is not going to do much except turn innocent civilians against whoever is inciting them.