Shame on ! More here on the forum http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/is-it-true-part-deux.495478/page-11#post-1069959704
Yes I agree... I think this is rubbish, no one wants the stupid US sanctions on Iran and now they are arresting people for not following their illegal sanctions.... I hope China gets really pissed off lol
Everything has its price. And the US fascist methods too. As of 20:00 Moscow time, the American Dow index fell by 608 points (-2.43%), during the bidding period its drop reached 758 points, bringing the total losses in the last two sessions to 1,500 points. The S & P 500 fell 2.1%, falling 2.8% as trading progressed. Such failures could have been predicted before the start of trading — by the behavior of futures for US indices, which fell sharply at night, due to which the CME Group operator even suspended trading for 10 seconds. On Monday, for the first time since 2007, a so-called. inversion: the yield of shorter securities exceeded the rates for longer ones. The yield of two- and three-year government securities was higher than that of five-year ones. If the same happens with two-year and 10-year papers, it will almost certainly indicate a coming recession: over the past 40 years, whenever this happened, a recession will soon occur. The last time she was in 2008-2009. The inversion of the yield curve is not in itself the cause of recessions, but it reflects a combination of factors that lead to a recession. An excessive rise in short-term interest rates means that investors believe that monetary policy is becoming too tight.
I guess you can fantasize about what you've written but to think the President would change his position because his daughter sells clothes in China seems to me to be a view wrapped in extreme bias and not objectivity.
You have presented no proof of that. Further, you continue to dodge relevant questions. I'll give it one last shot. When did Ivanka apply for trade marks?
Who knows 'when'? Who CARES when? It was all done AFTER her daddy paid for his right to be president, that's ALL that matters. You are possibly one of the most blinded, unpatriotic forum members I've encountered here yet.
LOL So when you can't answer questions, you simply resort to the same attack and insult mode common among liberals. Good luck with your mission.
did you even read what I said? foreign financial tie are put it under microscope and consider conflict of interest. She not just making thousands, shes making millions there. go look up foreign financial and clearance. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...80389a4e569_story.html?utm_term=.6265c765b841 if any normal American who hold clearance has 1% of that $$$ from foreign investment, he/she would be fired or investigated by now. but of course the elite will get away with it. go read up on US background check for clearance regarding foreign financial investment. its standard set for all American.
Read every word. It would be an interesting World if everyone with any tie to a President of the United States was required to be unemployed for fear there could be some conflict of interest down the road if they do anything to earn a living. With that in mind, I can't agree there is any conflict of interest. Ivanka has every right to pursue a living in any legal means available to her. Again, I suggest your position is fueled by bias, rather than a reasonable review of the facts and circumstances.
Hauwei has stolen 99% of its technology from its competitors so I have ZERO sympathy for that woman. On top of that their first flagship phone they market to western customers is made from cheap parts that break and wear out and just don't work.
lol $82million from foreign investment is not a fact and not conflict of interest while working in WH. like I said go read on background check for clearance.
If you can explain to me what significance the filing date of Ivankas trademark requests have on the topic then perhaps I would better understand what your point is. You're vague and pointless questions don't merit any response.
no sound like you are the bias one here. could you imagine if a normal American who hold clearance got 1% of $82m for foreign trade, he/she would be under investigate at the minimum. you just a big trump fun which cloud your judgement.
You claim it takes 12 months to get a trademark registered in China. So when did Ivanka apply? When I asked when she applied, you wrote the following: Who knows 'when'? Who CARES when? It was all done AFTER her daddy paid for his right to be president, So you don't know, but you do know. Which can only be read that you don't know much. Ivanka started her company in 2007, as I suspect you didn't know. https://www.businessinsider.com/ivanka-trump-brand-shuts-down-full-story-2018-7 Trump made her first foray into the fashion business with the launch of her fine jewelry company. She opened her first boutique on Manhattan's Upper East Side in 2007. At the end of 2010, she launched her new collection of shoes, which included 150 styles from "office-friendly pumps and special-occasion looks to sandals and sneakers," Footwear News reported at the time.
right like trump supporter, you just don't want admit truth. https://www.latimes.com/politics/wa...iness-ties-shrouded-1506435705-htmlstory.html
Learn to insult better. I always admit the truth as I see it. I'm not required to admit truths that you demand I agree with.
so $80+ million from foreign investment, plenty article link Ivanka to foreign business is not truth? maybe you should read the definition of conflict of interest. here is one more link out of hundreds on the net, seem to me you are a bias one. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/29/iva...rks-raise-conflict-of-interest-questions.html
When did Ivanka apply for those trademarks? The hit pieces from the critics of the President who profit from their conflicts of interest don't mention it.
Be wary. They have very good radios and microwave products but the rest is very suspect. If you are working for the military, they will not allow Huawei products in any solution.
My Iranian friends who reside in Southern California and visit the homeland often claim the sanctions have little effect. Anything they want can be found.