HUD moves to cancel illegal immigrants' public housing access

True. But we cannot let thousands of them in when we have no place to house them while the wait for hearing. Our own citizens need help. The homeless, those not earning enough to support themselves or their family at some point we have to turn them away. Taxpayers cannot support this cost. States cannot afford it. Enough

 

you are being disingenuous. Ellis Island could be upgraded to handle thousands per day. Refugees should always be a minority of those seeking access to our markets; that is why our Commerce Clause is important. We have no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

 

You're just hell bent on turning the US into the next India aren't you?

 

A person who is correct....please look up the word "illegal" in the dictionary.

 

Those who qualify as foreign invaders should not be receiving assistance and/or benefits from the country they cannot legally reside in, and whose presence alone is a criminal offense.

Even the dictionary itself agrees with the above.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illegal

illegal
adjective
il·le·gal | \ (ˌ)i(l)-ˈlē-gəl

\

Definition of illegal
(Entry 1 of 2)


: not according to or authorized by law : unlawful, illicit also : not sanctioned by official rules (as of a game)

illegal

noun
Definition of illegal (Entry 2 of 2)


sometimes disparaging + offensive

: a person who enters or lives in a country without the documentation required for legal entry or residence

 

You simply don't understand the difference.

We should have no illegal problem with a naturalization clause.

All foreign nationals in the US should have federal identification for civil purposes.

A fee or a fine is what our Commerce Clause is for.

 

we have no immigration clause. don't be illegal to Constitutional law, right wingers!

 

If you insist

 

Who said they wanted illegals to receive housing over Americans?

 

No you insist.

 

Anyone who does not understand illegal aliens are receiving public housing before citizens of the united states who just so happen to be members of the black community.

 

First of all you don't even live in the US, so you don't know **** about who is getting public housing and who isn't. With that said tell us who said, "illegals should receive US housing over Americans."

 

Except for what can be learned through actually researching a particular matter, rather than just mindlessly repeating a pre-approved talking point.

As was already explained in the previous post. Anyone who does not understand illegal aliens are receiving public housing before citizens of the united states who just so happen to be members of the black community.

 

What better research can you do than SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY LIVES IN THE COUNTRY AND HAS FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE WITH IT.

Really, tell me where illegals are getting public housing over American citizens.

 

Considering the fact most citizens of the united states cannot even use a map, or plot out their destination without the use of electronic assistance to tell them where they need to go? Or how citizens of the united states cannot even point to a specific country on a map when asked?

The states of California and New York, among other such locations where illegal aliens are catered to.

 

The real answer is, you have never been to America and don't know WTF you are talking about.

Really show me where either one of those states give illegals Gov't housing before they do Americans.

 

It is the topic that is presently being discussed. Illegal aliens would not currently be residing in public housing in the united states if they were not being housed ahead of united states citizens.

 

In other words you don't know WTF you are talking about.

 

The misinterpretation, and misunderstanding on the part of yourself, does nothing to ultimately change what are matters of fact. The basic matter is that those who hold office and claim to be looking out for the black community have concluded the illegal alien community is in a better position to serve and benefit them, and have disregarded the plight of the black community to better cater to the newest portion of the united states public that will more likely ensure their continued political rule. Blacks use to be the go-to minority to rely on when it came time for election. Now it is illegal aliens of hispanic origin, residing in locations that do not require voters to present identification or proof of residency.

Donald Trump is at least trying to do something about that, by terminating services to illegal aliens that are being denied to citizens of the united states who actually need them. Denying such facts does not change that they actually are facts.

 

Apparently that's 'racist.'

 

How is that racist?

 

African-Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, legal immigrants etc all use public housing. Why are you ok with harming Americans and making it harder for them to get public housing at the expense of people that violate our laws and come here illegally?

 

Who said I was ok with illegals getting public housing over Americans? You pulled that out your 4th pt of contact, I never said that. The claim was that policy dictated that they receive public housing over Americans, none of you have yet shown us that is true.

 

I only ask based on your WMAGA post. Glad you support the President here then

 

MWAGA is the brand folks like you promote.