I'm endorsing Donald Trump, because I can't put my life in Hillary's hands

Its about time.

Now you can finally say you are backing a nationalist not like in the primaries when you were supporting globalist rubio (if memory serves or some other eqally globalist figure) but still were sporting the americannationalist label.

That was good for a few laughs.

Anyways thats all behind us welcome aboard the Trump Train we have milk and cookies, donuts, coffee, do help yourself.

 

It's okay. Anybody can make a silly mistake.

Don't fret over it.

It is almost certain that Donald Trump will never win the presidency...and it is almost certain that Hillary Clinton will.

I'm sure she will not cause you to lose your life.

(Jeez...the drama in this place!)

 

We are more or less in the same boat. Trump is not my pick. I liked Rubio and Cruz. But now that Trump is the GOP nominee I will be voting for him, because the alternative is Hillary . . . and in 2016 she is unacceptable.

 

Oh Well!
​

 

You really want to back a guy who would go to nuclear war over a insulting gesture?
You really want to back a guy who has openly expressed committing war crimes?
You really want to back a guy who has decided to make shunning the multicultural fabric of America part of his campaign?

What I say here is what I said in a YT comment to someone who thought the deranged Barbie doll (Kellyanne Conway) owned Chuck Todd. What will you say to your kids, when Trump has run America into the ground, China becomes bigger of a economic superpower than it already is from weak tariff attempts, our foreign relations diminish (partially from disbanding from NATO), and our relationship with Mexico only gets worse, what will you say to your future generation what good voting for Trump was? And more than merely a protest vote.

 

Lolz at lefty appeal to emotion over logic.

It wont work for you this cycle.

You should learn your lessons.

 

Don't leftists know that there are nuclear safeguards in place so that no government rogue -- not even a total screw-up of a president like Obama -- can order a nuclear launch on a whim?

 

Are you kidding?

Libya? Where no military has lost their lives? Where we do not have a military presence? THAT is what you see as a "danger" to you?

But you trust the erratic carney barker with the nuclear codes?

That's insane

 

That's not the danger. The danger is having a loudmouthed thin skinned egotist back us into a situation where we have no choice but to use force

 

Logic would dictate you can't force another country to pay for a homegrown expense? Oh wait......

Duh, yeah. But even the notion Trump would bring that up, when North Korea clearly has demonstrated it has the nuclear capability, cannot be taken lightly.

 

Hillary supporters are losing it.

 

Well yes it can, because he can't do it. On the other hand he might find it useful in negotiations as a bluff. You know the stuff that Obama never learned how to do and the stuff that makes most leftists wring their hands in delicate snowflake anxiety, by far preferring that Obama just give away the store to -- say -- Iran?

- - - Updated - - -

How no choice? There is always a choice. On the other hand Obama giving away the store to Iran in his 'negotiations' are eventually going to cause massive problems that a future president will have to face.

 

Oh gee, so destabilizing countries and entire regions, turning them into failed states, the hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism is OK if no american lives are lost, even if hundreds of thousands of "non-white" local people are dead because of it?

LOL, coming from leftist globalists/internationalists it's actually double funny.

 

Well to be fair everyone knows that leftists don't REALLY care about brown folk except for their votes.

 

On the other hand he might find it useful in negotiations as a bluff.

And therein lies the idiocy of Trump.

That is NOT something you use as a bluff.

Bluffs get called...

 

A. We didn't make that happen. It was already happening.

B. Have you forgotten that you supported Iraq and Afghanistan already?

Oh wait...no one supported those disasters right? Well no one will admit it anyway....

 

Ah and so THAT's why Obama gave away the store to Iran? He's just another poor little leftest snowflake. Perhaps in his next incarnation he will come back as a man.

 

Didn't you endorse Hillary Clinton because you couldn't put your life in Trump's hands because of your need for medical insurance a few months ago?

 

That makes no sense...but hey...it gave you a chance to unleash your vitriol

 

Not so much Cruz, but if anyone were paying attention, Marco Rubio was KILLING it in the debates. He even made me agree with the premise of the Gang of 8 Bill. Rubio is the Eisenhower of our times, and I'd MUCH prefer him to be president. But sadly, we can't annoint just "anyone".

 

Actually, no. What I said is that I endorse across-state-lines(which Democrats reject) because it's absolutely ABSURD that if someone moves, they have to register with another insurance company(if it doesn't carry in that State) and some people might not actually have that money, or those finances to register right away with the State they move in!

Picking between these two is like picking between which poison do I want to take. And right now, Hillary Clinton is utterly WEAK on National Security and in fact partially the cause of the present problems. I'd be a fool to put her in the oval office when she failed as secretary of State.

 

Multiculturalism has failed around the world and in America. Gordon Brown has admitted it, Angela Merkel has suffered tremendously from it. Look, it was a nice and noble idea that everyone could live amongst each other regardless of race, creed or nationality but it just isn't so. A German has their particular way of living, so does a Mexican, a Danish, a Canadian and an American. There are distinctive, fundamental differences between all of us that makes the borg hive concept not only impossible but destructive to its own ends.

We realize that now, in 2016. It's a complete failure. Does that mean we should be completely isolated? No, I actually have my own ideas about a true international community, but it's clear that multiculturalism isn't it. I think we should be neutrally respectful to each other. I think we should respect each other's differences and where those differences exist, if we can't co-exist it's best to go our own ways.

As an example: Islamism and the West. We're oil and water. There's NOTHING good that comes from our interactions with each other, NONE. Both sides think the other wants to eliminate the other completely from existence. The difference is that we KNOW one(Islam) definitely does. Because of this, I have no illusion about some "reform of Islam" or anything of the sort.

That being the case, since Islamics think the West is so deprived, so hopeless, I think it's best for them to remain in the Middle East. And since we're not going to change our so-called "depravity", it's best for us not to invite them. Some people, were just never meant to be.

Unless we get cognizant of this fact, our "multiculturalism" will, and has utterly destroyed the United States. Multiculturalism will sooner destroy and blur the lines between immigrants, than Donald Trump has.

 

I was supporting Rubio because I thought(and still believe) he's a blend of both and I think we'll get positive reforms and much better relations with a President Marco Rubio. When I listened to him, I just got the genuine "good guy" feel. A guy you can drink coffee or whatever with, and even if you disagreed you'd have a good time.

That of course is behind us. Now it's about making Donald Trump succeed over this political opportunist who has abused the public trust for far too long and has proven inept at keeping us safe as secretary, or making the kind of strong statements a president needs to make.

 

Well said.

 

You've been pretending to be neutral for some time.

I find your "endorsement" disappointing, but not surprising.

I also note that your endorsement carries not a hint of either an intelligent (or even accurate) argument, nor does it say one good word about the candidate you're now waving your pom poms for.

Your claim that Clinton caused the civil war in Lybia is ridiculously false, but it is one that the alt right on this forum seems to have embraced, even though the simplist Google search will expose it as nonsense.

I have no idea what you're talking about when you talk about Pam Geller, ISIS and Texas. There is no evidence to support that either. Pam Geller is a political operative who makes a living promoting Islamophobia and fearmongering. She is also a liar and a fraud. She was the one behind the notorious video that caused riots across the Middle East, including in Benghazi.

Your claim that she exposed ISIS in Texas is false. I know of an event she staged in order to incite violence, which is what she did, but she exposed no one in ISIS.

The event at the Boston Marathon was not the work of someone who crossed the US Mexico border, but rather of two people born in the United States. So, your insistance that you want the border addressed because of the Boston attack doesn't make any sense at all.

Finally, your blythe attempt to equate the ridiculous, bombastic and totally uninformed rhetoric of Mr Trump on foreign policy with Mrs Clinton is ridiculous. Trump is the one talking about bombing people, nuclear proliferation, and destablizing regions, not Clinton.

In the foreign policy arena, Donald Trump will outdo George W Bush. It took Bush about two thirds of his first term before he became an international pariah. Trump already is one.

Clinton is a world leader, and actually knows most of the people Trump can't even name. Trump is a world class buffoon

It is sad that after months of pretending to weight the facts, you come up with an endorsement like this. So full of distortions, ridiculous claims, and outright falsehood

It drips of xenophobia and nativist parochialsim.

It doesn't reflect either facts or reality. But it is certainly a mirror on the ignorance of the far right wing, and their coloring book understanding of the world.