Yes, you did “so they have slowed a little, ok” Devos, Pruit, Shulkin; I can continue if you would like to ignore more information
There has been unrest in the Middle East for, well ever...there was a chance for peace during the Arab Spring but we lacked leadership
That’s not a recession. That’s what happens when you get full employment What about them? How has anything been destroyed? Last I checked the Dept Iof Education was still there
How many of those 60,000 would have been killed anyways if there was no Vietnam War ? Serving in the U.S.military is a very dangerous job during war time and also peace time. Training for war is a deadly serious job and soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen get killed. What shooting war was America involved in during the first year under Reagan in 1981 ? 2.380 American soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen were killed while on active duty in the military. During the Bush (43) administration while fighting two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq the year with the highest casualties was in 2005 with 1,929 deaths. -> https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
That’s the literal definition of a recession. If two quarters are lower than the last it is classified as recession. I can post the definition if needed... They are undercutting the mission statement of the department. What qualifications does Devos have besides huge campaign contributions?
We aren’t in a recession How so? She was on the board of Exellence in Education, and the Allaince for School Choice
I never said we were in a recession, I have said manufacturing is in recession. Which you agreed with and basically said so what? Now you are trying to create false arguments not made.
No I said we were near full employment Huh? I have asked you how he is destroying our institutions...you have failed to provide any thing
Feel free to disprove manufacturing is in a recession then. And we are no where near full employment U6 is almost at 7% https://www.scientificamerican.com/...scenes-at-trumps-troubled-environment-agency/ Science under Siege: Behind the Scenes at Trump's Troubled Environment Agency
I can’t disprove something that isn’t there We have 3.5 percent UE Your article literally says the day to day work at the EPA has changed little...but moral is down because of the never ending speculations from leftist propaganda,..hahaha
You cannot prove that manufacturing is not in recession, but I can prove (and have done so) that it is. Thus you conceede, please pick the next item you feel is parody. From the article “nominated Scott Pruitt to head the agency—a man who had spent his career filing lawsuits to block a variety of EPA regulations.” “The president has sought to slash its budget by nearly one-third, and Pruitt’s team has tried to weaken the part that science plays in setting environmental regulations. He barred some top researchers from participating in EPA advisory panels, and replaced them with scientists who are more friendly to industry. All of this has elevated the power of corporations to influence the rules that govern chemicals and pollutants.” “What most troubles many EPA scientists is the Trump administration’s systematic and unprecedented effort to undermine the way in which science is used by the agency. Scientists there say they and their work have been largely ignored by senior EPA leadership. And despite Pruitt’s resignation, few expect the administration’s overarching EPA strategy to change once Trump appoints a new administrator. For now, the leadership reins fall to Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist. In a pair of tweets announcing Pruitt’s resignation, Trump said that Wheeler would “continue on with our great and lasting EPA agenda”. Try again
no you haven’t Just because this admin has a different policy with the EPA doesn’t mean he has destroyed it. It’s simply different policy. As the article highlights though the day to day operations haven’t changed
Having different policy then Obama isn’t destroying the institution...it’s different policy, and why trump was elected
Having a different policy than what the institutions were created for is destroying the institution. So would you like to pick the next “parody” in my post so I can address it — since you have gone from not understanding, to agreeing with (but deeming irrelevant) to lying about , and now ignoring manufacturing data. The only parody here is your integrity
They don’t have a different policy then what the agency was created for. The agency was created to enforce the clear air act and clean water act, they are still doing that
So after calling eight separate items you claimed were parody the only one you can seize on is opinion. (Ignoring that people heading these institutions lobbied against them prior to their consideration.) ok I accept your concession.
I’m just glad rhe American people did not listen to Obama and voted for a man that had that magic wand