Is Helping Ukraine a U.S. Imperative?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Arphen, Aug 27, 2014.

  1. Arphen

    Arphen Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Events in Gaza, Iraq and Ukraine require a strategic approach by the US - the ability to defend American interests in different places at the same time (of course, because Obama is a self-proclaimed world's policeman).
    William Perry - Minister of Defense in the Clinton administration - and George Shultz - Secretary of State under President Ronald Reagan called on the administration of Barack Obama to provide military and economic assistance to Ukraine in the framework of "strategic approach", which will allow to protect interests of United States in the region. Perry and Schultz also believe that the United States should provide guarantees to the Baltic states, placing troops in these countries on a rotating basis...
    http://online.wsj.com/articles/will...?KEYWORDS=Russia&cb=logged0.38643471857620193

    I wonder what kind of independent Ukraine can be discussed if the present Ukraine government is the White House`s puppet? And something else. We have a growing external debt, unemployment, domestic economy is in decline. And the government has remained true to its principles: to solve all its economic problems at the expense of other states. Ukraine at a strategic position in the heart of Europe, at the crossroads of trade routes between Russia and the EU...and people's lives and the fate of the whole country is not cost anything...
     

Share This Page