Is Hillary Clinton preparing for another presidential run?

That Skank believes that the white house belongs to her, she will never give it up. I hope she runs again.

 

I have little doubt that she would be considering it even if she was on her death bed with weeks to go come election day.

 

Yes, I'm one of them.

 

She did a slow shuffle last time; she might possibly get her name on the ballot but she can't run.

 

A supporter of fresh faces? Who do you like and why?

 

Do you think her husband and daughter might sit her down and say, "You dont want to do this"?

 

An interesting question. . .and one I'm not really prepared to answer fully at this time. I was a Bernie supporter, and would like someone who offers similar solutions offered by Bernie last time. I like Joe Biden & Elizabeth Warren, but am concerned by their age--not that makes them less effective as a leader--but it makes them appear as the "Old Guard" of the party at a time when new blood could be the key to getting elected. I am personally more left than most Democrats, but I'd still be enthusiastic for a moderate Democrat as a vast improvement over what we have in the White House today. Conservatism seems to have gone over the cliff since 2010. Extremists have redefined the conservative perspective till it has little in common with what it's been historically. For me, it's become an ugly philosophy, and one I want to see replaced ASAP by something more humane.

 

I'd be fine with small pockets of socialism here and there, where the participants were totally in agreement, and decision making were fully democratic, as was the case of the apostles in early christianity. The Amish and I think the Hutterites practiced a kind of socialism. But forcing people in one part of a large industrialized country to share with people they don't know and who don't share their religion or values will always lead to frustration and resentment. That's the reason the right and the left will never get along --they both feel they are being forced to change their values, some of which evolved over millenia.

We won't be at peace till we can find a means to go our separate ways. This is happening now -- few libs want to move south and few rightists want to move to the northeast.

 

So another run would make her burnt toast.

 

No. Chelsea is dumb as a box of rocks and Bill is now senile.

 

Why shouldn't she run again. She got more votes, didn't she?

 

The only Democrat who possibly could have won against Trump was Joe Biden because he is as good at sneering and name-calling as Trump is, and old Joe knows how to talk to old white people, which Hilary did not. But he chickened out and his time is past. The Democratic Party has now run so far left he'd promptly be blown out in the primary.

The strongest candidate Democrats could run in 2020 is Michelle Obama (with Oprah bailing out) because the MSM would promote her 24/7, she female and she's black. The only obstacle she would face is one Hilary faced - she is such an ego maniac explosive temper hothead the powers-that-be would, ie the all-power US Intel community, would question her submissiveness, which of course they demand and go berserk against anyone who won't do 100% what they say - why they are openly at war with President Trump.

The election was manipulated - but it was by the US Intel community - because the decided Hilary Clinton was just too volatile and unpredictable - particularly with her promising she'd order the USA military to directly attack the Russian military in Syria. The US Intel community wants perpetual COLD WAR with Russia - but NO SANE PERSON wants a shooting war directly with Russia as that is true total suicide.

 

That's my assessment of her as well. She was obviously physically -- and perhaps mentally -- ill in 2016 and if not for the leftist-allied MSM being DETERMINED that nobody would catch more than a hint of it, the whole nation would have known it as a fact. That aside, however, I don't see the DNC taking another chance on their Queen of Corruption since they decide well ahead of time who will become their presidential nominee.

 

Your post reflects the reality of human history since the first Homo Sapiens emerged from the trees of Africa--possibly sooner. It is logical to assume humans will continue being aggressive toward others around them who are different, but there are forces at play today that have never been involved before in human history. First, the space age has demonstrated in very concrete terms the reality that every human being rides on the same small planet. We are all in the same canoe--so to speak. Never before in history have humans seen first hand, as we do today in photos & personal experience, the limits of our small blue dot in the cosmos. Whatever we do to that dot or the living beings on it, will ultimately determine our own fate. Second, the internet has already changed the world view of many humans around the globe. It allows individuals such as you and I to talk directly with individuals almost anywhere in the world, regardless of national boundaries. This is a powerful form of globalization that is changing human attitudes toward "outsiders" daily, and helping many of us realize we have much more in common with each other than differences. Why should we continue battering each other over those irrelevant differences? What a waste of time, money & resources. The internet is forcing us to see humanity as a whole. This is a really good thing. Thirdly, the population of the Earth is reaching a finite limit is ability to sustain the population itself. Overpopulation is a core cause of most of the critical issues we face today--nationally & globally. And no one is talking about solutions. Possibly this is due to the fact it's never been an issue before in history. But it is now. The solution must be cognizant of the rights of those already alive. The solution cannot be the elimination of those living, but better control over those yet to be conceived & born. I don't know the answer, but it's an issue that must be addressed eventually. All these factors make continuing along the line you advocate more and more likely to fail. Unless humankind raises its level of consciousness to be inclusive with each other globally, we will go the way of the dinosaurs and other extinct species.

 

I am open to suggestions, but the Libertarian (favoring local and small government) and the progressive (favoring equality for all and a strong central government to guarantee it) are each entitled to their point of view, and neither will ever like the other's game plan.

 

You make a valid point. However, as the Internet increases our personal identification with a global society, nature is forcing us to recognize our global situation with rapidly rising temperatures we call "Global Warming". Personally, I don't think human history is a series of random choices. I think it's structured toward increasing complexity and conscious advancement. I feel we're now entering a crucial transition zone between our past scattered affiliations with ethnic, racial, linguistic, regional, & national differences, toward a more holistic view of humanity as a whole, living & functioning together on a single blue dot in the cosmos. Our survival increasingly depends on our ability to accept one another & work together harmoniously to save the planet that we all inhabit. Our present leadership (and current population) hasn't yet recognized this fact. The longer we wait to address it, the more difficult it will become to find a solution.

 

I do not know if Hellary Rodham Clinton is going to run or not, but what I do know is that if she was ever to become POTUS, she will surely bring more war, debt, illegals, and immigrants as well as more poverty and strike in the world we call These United States of [North] America.

 

That's rather presumptuous of you. I see no evidence to support those gloomy predictions. Have you given any thought to the disaster Trump has become?

 

I use the Clinton Reign of Terror in both Arkansas and Washington, D.C. as references to support my contention. Then again, as I have stated before, I am not in the business of changing the way people think.

 

Why shouldn't she run? She got more votes and if it wasn't for those damn Russians she would have won the electoral vote by a landslide - and Mueller is taking care of that, isn't he?.
All you Democrats agree, don't you?

Run, Hilary, run. See Hilary run.

 

That old woman will never give up. Yes. She will try again.