Is Neo[Atheism] a Rational Religion?

LMAO anyone can simly click the little arrow and see its a direct quote and you agreed with me after 200 posts of bullshit.

 

And anyone who can actually read English can see what I just told you:

I've consistently said that "Yellow = red and green" is a proposition. What I've said is that "Yellow" is not a proposition and that "red and green" is not a proposition, but only the whole sentence. Try reading. It isn't as hard as you make it out to be.

 

Not me thats you that says that, I am not that foolish and have consistently argued its value as pure unadulterated nonsense, just like the agnostic atheist stupidity.

 

yep thats what need, to look at the context.
Go for it your batting 0 on 5 so far! lol

 

So you no longer claim that you don't know whether or not god exists. After years of arguing EXACTLY that. Dude, make up your ****ing mind.

 

This is not an intelligible English sentence. You actually have the nerve to lecture me about English after writing something like that?

 

thats your argument, I never did, go ahead quote it! LMAO

 

You never argued that you don't know whether or not god exists? You are no longer an agnostic?

 

Ah yeh I type so fast my keyboard skips sometime, wow talk about weak!
Better hurry your ice is almost completely gone!

 

only to mock the I dont know stupidity
and the agnostic atheist stupidity
everyone is waiting for you to quote me you said you would wtf is it?

 

So are you agnostic or not? You are contradicting yourself.

 

Yardmeat: You never argued that you don't know whether or not god exists?
@Kokomojojo
only to mock the I dont know stupidity

Koko, is the above true, or are you ACTUALLY agnostic? You've never been consistent about this ****, but hopefully we can finally get a straight answer out of you today. Are you a theist, an atheist, or an agnostic? The above indicates that you were lying all of those times when you said you were an agnostic and that you were, instead, only mocking agnostics. Is that what you want to stick with?

 

YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
YES!
yep thats what I need, to look at the context.
Go for it your batting 0 on 5 so far! lol
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!
Waiting!

thats your argument, I never did, go ahead quote it! LMAO

DODGE!
DODGE!
DODGE!
DODGE!
DODGE!
DODGE!
DODGE!

There you go folks Game set match!
Thanks for wasting everyones time, errm I mean playing

 

I just need to make sure that I'm hearing you correctly: after years of saying that you don't know whether or not God exists, you are now claiming you were lying that entire time? Really?

@Jolly Penguin , are you seeing this ****? I didn't think it could get any worse. I was wrong.

 

Oh yeh now the lets move the goal posts trick, we all know man, put some clothes on already!

you get everything bassackwards in here and expect us to believe ANYTHING you claim? PUHLEASE!

Sorry folks, nothing to see here, as usual the yardmeat cant source his claims with a quote, of course thats what happens to these guys who make **** up as they go and blame everyone else for their dirty deeds! PLONK!

Yardmeat is the weakest link, yer otta here!

 

Dude, you can't even decide if you are agnostic or not.

 

Nope. That's an equivocation fallacy. Swensson just referred to oxfords definition which is different than the one you are using in response. I think you know this and are trolling again.

 

I didnt state a definition, I stated my position. go ahead try again!

 

Nothing like an honest debate!

yer doing great keep up the good work!

 

[

No. A Christian's rejection of an atheist's world view is not itself a world view. Why is this so difficult for you?

 

I'm being literal. You can't even decide if you are agnostic or not. Dance and dodge all you want, but it is true.

 

He insists he has never said he does not know if God exists, except in jest. That may be true.

He also wrote he is not so foolish to say that he doesn't know. This can't mean he does know, because he has told us he both doesn't believe God exists and doesn't believe God does not exist. If he knew if God exists, he would believe one or the other.

One can only conclude he is being purposefully cryptic and trolling. That's a fair conclusion since despite repeated invitations to explain himself, he never does.

 

You claimed what Swensson wrote proved what it did not, and only could if definitions were equivocated. More word games from you.

 

Here's your out Koko:

Claim Schrodinger's God. Say God can exist and not exist at the same time and you can know and not know this at the same time. That may clear up most of your contradictions.

 

True, that's the only out at this point. It is a creative one, but it is the only way to save face. Hell, I'd even let him have that one if he went that route.