Obama never apologized to the family of the dead SEALs that he told were killed because of a youtube movie (which the family confirmed he and Hillary said). Then the facts came out. Why should Trump apologize? Obama did enough apologizing for the next few Presidents when he did his overseas apology tour "on behalf of the United States"
From the article: I won't spin anything here other than to say that even this unsubstantiated report does not reference Obama, which was the basis of your accusation. I would also note that the recommendation, if true, seems quite reasonable.
Do you really and truly believe that Obama never apologized to the family? Or just that Obama never apologized for citing the youtube video as a motivating factor for some terrorists in the area?
This was the family's biggest complaint. That he didn't apologize. They went on all those talk shows back in like '12 and '13
You're right Natty Bumpo but many people do the same against Trump and his family. I've heard some say her wife was an escort...but they have no evidence for that. They couldn't prove anything :dunno:
I recall that rag the Daily Mail published that claim and got into hot water for it. Basic problem I see is that too many people believe what they read or hear without a modicum of skepticism, usually depending on their personal views and how well what they're hearing fits with them.
Diversion. Does not address the topic of this poll. If one falsely accuses another of a felony, calls him "bad" or "sick", evokes "McCarthyism" and "Watergate", and then no one, including oneself, can offer any evidence to substantiate one's false accusation, such behaviour is considered appropriate, responsible, mature, normal, and indicative of common decency.
Any person who made a false accusation concerning a Trump wife owes her an apology if he cannot support his accusation with credible evidence. That person bears the same moral obligation as does Trump, but whether he honours his responsibility has no bearing upon Trump honouring his.
False. It's a disparate allegation that in no way addresses the poll's topic. Nor does your allegation impact the issue: whether Trump is capable of apologizing for making this false accusation. Your attempt at diversion is not a viable strategy to fulfill your desire to avoid confronting the question.
Whether I like presidents to be able to speak Urdu is also a possible diversion, but this poll concerns whether Trump should apologize to Obama if he is ever temperamentally capable of admitting to being wrong. Your desperation to avoid honestly answering the poll's question is an answer in itself.
Haha that must be a tough question for you to ask. Let's summarize: You want Trump to admit he life, but you did not want Obama to admit he lied. Thank you for clearing this up for us
No, it's a very easy and direct question to ask. What appears to be tough is for you to honestly confront and answer it: Is Trump capable of apologizing to Obama? Yes, when he's wrong, he's big enough to admit it. No, he can never admit to being wrong.
Well why should Trump apologize to Obama? When Obama lied, he did not apologize. Shouldn't Trump follow Obama's footsteps when being caught in a lie? Or are you saying Trump should be the bigger man?
The Cut of Trumpery follows their messiah's pathological denial, but what is far more important is whether Trump is temperamentally incapable of honestly taking responsibility for his lie, and admitting to fallibility. That is a matter that could seriously damage the nation. "Oh yeah! Well, Warren G Harding had a mistress! Why don't the fake media, the fake intelligence services, fake law enforcement agencies, fake senators, fake representatives, and those fake British get righteous about that, huh?"
What is of legitimate concern to the nation is that the lies and/or paranoid delusions ("thousands of thousands" of invisible folks cheering terrorism in NJ, "millions" of phantom voters all casting ballots against him, a media conspiracy that persecutes him, imaginary wiretaps, etc.) will render him a national liability. International allies, US intelligence agencies, congress, the courts, the American people will conclude he is temperamentally unstable. If his delusional episodes persist and he in unable to confront them, they will only accumulate and his tenuous connection with reality will reach critical mass at some point.
Alibi: I was cruisin' Beale Street with the King at the time... ... and I don't care what US intelligence services, law enforcement, senators, congressmen, and the British government might say about it!