A meeting of ambassadors of the Islamic countries has decided to raise the issue of blasphemous content on social media in the United Nations. The Islamofascists strikes again. I wonder when will the democrat countries wake up. http://gulftoday.ae/portal/e3410db6-76a6-485a-a4f1-41f546f1175a.aspx
The ambassadors of the Islamic countries have some nerve. I'm glad I live in the west with a separation of church and state. And the government shall not respect the establishment of religion.
Zionists have been trying to falsify and edit the content of the Internet for years. I dare say that there will be one two along in a minute to emphasize my point. The 'net should be free and uncensored. That is TOTALLY uncensored. As soon as you accept interference with it you become a censor's apprentice.
This thread is about the Muslim states trying to apply censorship on the global internet using the UN. If you want to talk about other stuff, please open your own thread.
I'm sure it's not as bad as this: Leaked Documents Show German Intelligence Agency Spent Years Spying On Foreign And Domestic Journalists from the no-oversight,-no-self-control dept The tools are there to be abused. Anyone who doubts this aspect of intrusive surveillance programs is either a supporter or a beneficiary. Oversight might be in place and various checks and balances instituted, but the scope and breadth of these programs ensures -- at minimum -- collection of communications and data government surveillance agencies have no business looking at. If someone's given a tool that allows them to snoop on almost anyone with impunity, it will eventually be abused. Case in point: everywhere and everything related to state-sponsored surveillance. Spiegel, which has published several surveillance agency leaks (from Snowden and others), has obtained some more documents. The documents haven't been published, but the contents indicate that -- from 1999 on -- Germany's foreign intelligence agency (BND) has used its powers to snoop on journalists and their sources. According to documents seen by SPIEGEL, the BND conducted surveillance on at least 50 [...] telephone numbers, fax numbers and email addresses belonging to journalists or newsrooms around the world in the years following 1999. Included among them were more than a dozen connections belonging to the BBC, often to the offices of the international World Service. The documents indicate that the German intelligence agency didn't just tap into the phones of BBC correspondents in Afghanistan, but also targeted telephone and fax numbers at BBC headquarters in London. A phone number belonging to the New York Times in Afghanistan was also on the BND list, as were several mobile and satellite numbers belonging to the news agency Reuters in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. The extent of the surveillance isn't detailed in the article. The writer refers to phones being "tapped" but also states the journalists' numbers were used as "selectors," which possibly means this was limited to data collection, rather than communications. Not that it possibly being "just metadata" makes it any less of a violation. German law supposedly shelters journalists from domestic surveillance with protections roughly comparable to attorney-client privilege. But the reality of the situation proves the country's laws are only as strong as those enforcing them. Watching the watchers is something no country seems to do well, and Germany is no exception. This wouldn't be the only time Germany's BND has targeted journalists. It may be the earliest (leaked) record of such behavior, but Spiegel has covered previous leaks in which journalists' emails were intercepted and other journalists were caught in the crossfire of BND's surveillance of allies' government agencies. This news comes just as a three-year investigation into BND's tactics and surveillance programs wraps up. Not that anything will come of this investigation. During the investigation's running time, leaks continued to highlight inappropriate surveillance, even as Germany's legislators set about codifying BND's previously-illegal snooping. As long as surveillance powers continue to expand and agencies are given a free pass for previous bad behavior, citizens' rights will continue to be violated. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...ars-spying-foreign-domestic-journalists.shtml
More likely they're looking for information they couldn't otherwise get... Could Russia Cut Off The Internet? December 15, 2017 - On the heels of the FCC repeal of Net Neutrality comes another internet carfuffle, this time via Russia ... or they're4 wanting to inject fake information into the system.
I thought this was interesting from the article.. ""The interior minister pointed out that distortion of religious beliefs and sacrilege of holy personalities of any religion is intolerable. He said that no law permits showing disrespect or distortion of any religion. "" Any US citizen, especially the atheists here in freedom loving US should raise an eyebrow regarding that.
Leave it to the Christian Nation lynching enforcement immaculate conception practice national religion of baptizing eyes by urination & it's need of punk ass bitches for a supreme swastika up Uranus courting where thieving US Constitution arsonists prove it's one nation under God like Islam "death to the infidels" .
if one does not believe in the other's god it is not hate speach. if one thinks the other's religious institutions corrupts the mind of the belivers and use them for inflicting damage for political reasons it is not a hate speach.
All the decades of serve the Pope or die Christian drug wars they are making babies for to further bankrupt the nation along with getting free medical care in creating armies of slaughterers of America; which seems to be that Islam "death to the infidels" growth stimulus of waging drug wars also.
Lets first go back to your "This thread is about the Muslim states trying to apply censorship on the global internet using the UN" That is just not what the Muslim states are trying to do one bit. As for "if one does not believe in the other's god it is not hate speach." That is just not what the Muslim states are trying to do one bit as well. As for "f one thinks the other's religious institutions corrupts the mind of the belivers and use them for inflicting damage for political reasons it is not a hate speach." That is just not what the Muslim states are trying to do one bit as well. But that is a hate speech by claiming all Muslim mosques are violent and so criminal institutions... who subsequently should be dealt with... and so your going on a holy war against it. But it seems clear you got no clue what the OP is about. lol
Leftist will do so it's church and state separated, not mosque and state. In germany, jews renounced to wear kippa in public, in France, it's for years if it isn't dozen of years. Europe have betrayed their own jews once again.
Similar to that glitch in the Islamidiotocracy master race master plan where if Christians crusade against the USA with drugs for years with KKK churchstate lynching enforcement to ensure the cross is higher than the flag, US Constitution, etc.; then why let Islam unlock similar "death to the infidels" tactics with special giftwrapped religious drug wars & bombings to prove it's one nation under God.
you cannot deal with the subject so you attack the messanger. here is the subject again: issue of blasphemous content on social media.
Sexual harassments as a national religion diversion from an enlightenment of a Christian Nation from the Catholic Church assassination of JFK so Christian drug wars could obtain liberty & justice for the master race also divert attention from it's Islamidiotocracy second coming thru 9/11 where now an Islam opioid crisis is deja vu.
You made zero comments on blasphemous content on social media in your previous post. How is it you think you're being on topic?
For what it's worth the federal lynching state of hate "serve the Pope or die" dictates mention of an Islam-Christian conspiracy resulting in 9/11 as blasphemous......
