Israel FM dismisses Palestinian threat over axe remark

When the Israeli Jews VOTED on Likud with it's pro warcrime agenda = they vote on Lieberman the Jewish terrorist. And they made that combination the biggest political party. You whining of separation after the vote does not change jack poop what them Jews liked the most WHEN THEY VOTED.

And them Israeli Jews made the political party whose plan is to make more war crimes against Arabs the biggest party again. And that party made racist slurs all the way to election day to draw more voters to it's cause.

That says a lot about Israeli society. Specifically,.. the Jewish Israeli society.

 

What the elections said was that Israelis trust Likud for security but are moving center-left on everything else. That far right lost seats and power, those are called facts. What is says about Israeli society is that they have given up on making peace and what they want is to be left alone by Palestinians and to leave them alone at the same time. Anyone saying different doesn't have a clue.

 

When they voted in the elections of 2013, but in the last elections (that was in March 17th, and the elections you refered to ) they was already sepereted.

As I wrote to you, when people voted to the Likud on March 17th, they they voted for Bibi, and not for Lieberman, because Lieberman in this elections wasnt linked to Likud.

It doesnt say much about the Jewish Israeli society, you are just generelizing. Not all the Jewish Israeli society is supporting right-wing parties or parties that are extremists like Marzel's Party.

A personal example- I voted for a right-wing party (not Likud or Israel Beytenu) and I support that the Arab Israeli citizens in Israel will get the same treatment that the Jewish Israeli citizens gets, it starts with enforcing the Israeli laws in Arab villages and cities that today it doesnt happen, I'm supporting that Arabs will be politicians, lawyers, judges. doctors etc. in Israel, like the rest of the citizens, I'm supporting that the Arabs will get social security unemployment benefits when they need it, which it happens.

Does Arabs have a problem of getting a private house in Israel? corrcet, but that is just the problem that the Jewish Israeli citizens have as well.
Does Arabs have problem of buying groceries in Israel because it is expensive? correct, but that is just the problem that the Jewish Isreali citizens have as well.
Does Arabs get low paychecks, which are much lower from what they need to spend? correct, but that is just the problem that the Jewish Israeli citizens have as well.

When there is a right-wing politician that says that the law needs to be enforced in the Arab cities and villages in Israel, he is correct, but right after he said it, then left-wing supporters sreamed that he is a recist, even if the Arab politicians said the same thing several years ago. This is a problem when a politician say that the law needs to be enforced in those areas and in respond instead of getting reinforcements, he gets to be called names as "racsit".

 

Yeah... give it a twist. They still voted on a party that has on it's agenda to commit war crimes and is directly linked to a terrorist. That says a lot.

 

I did not refer to the elections of 2014, since it did not happen at that time.

No I'm not. I'm saying as it is... the Israeli Jewish society made a party the biggest that has making war crimes on it's agenda and is directly linked to a terrorist. It's just the way the Israeli Jewish society freely choose to be.

 

But Lieberman was linked to the Likud in the elections of 2013, so if you like to say that Liebermen is linked, then you need to refer to those elections. Today he is not linked to te Likud.

The Likud isnt linked to Lieberman, it as linked in the electione of 2013.

The Israei Jewish society is also against mistreating civilians and against the Likud, but according to how you wrote your comment ("the Israeli Jewish society") has chose Bibi, like everyone who is Israeli Jew in Israel voted for Bibi, and because of that you are generelizing.

I gave you a personal example, bu I guess you prefer to ignore it then replying to it.

 

At the time I wrote it,.. the elections of 2015 did not happen.
At the time I wrote it, that terrorist got his place in the government because Israeli Jews voted on Likud.

It still is that the Israeli Jewish society made a political party that supports making war crimes against specifically Arabs their biggest party. A party that previously had no problem to have a terrorist in their mids. That says plenty about how rotten that society is.

 

At the time you wrote it, Lieberman wasnt part or linked to the Likud.

As I wrote to you:

 

got his place in the government because Israeli Jews voted on Likud. And them Israeli jews made that terrorist with that pro war crime party, the biggest political block.

It says everything about a society when they democratically elect that they get governed by a terrorist who joined forces with a party who supports war crimes.

 

That was, today the reality is that Lieberman is not linked to the Likud, so when you are trying to make him linked to the Likud even today is not historicaly correct.

Lieberman is not connected to the Likud nowadays, Lieberman and Bibi have sepereted parties.
Whoever voted for the Likud voted for Bibi, not Lieberman.

 

Currently Israelis are fretting about isolation.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/23/us-israel-politics-isolation-idUSKBN0MJ1JQ20150323


(Reuters) - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's re-election last week has prompted alarmed chatter in the cafes of Tel Aviv and on talk shows about the risk of Israel losing the support of its closest allies and being left isolated in the world.

It is clear Netanyahu still has fences to mend with President Barack Obama, despite rowing back from his rejection of a two-state solution with the Palestinians, which prompted new calls for sanctions from campaign group BDS.

But fears in Israel that another Netanyahu government, this one more right-wing than the last, will lead the country towards isolation appear to be running ahead of reality.

While the United States talks about a "reassessment" of its ties with Israel, it has so far put little flesh on the bones of the suggestion, instead wielding it as a stern verbal warning to Netanyahu not to push the situation too far.

On defense and security, the White House has made clear there will be no change in policy, and Israel's director of military intelligence recently returned from a working visit to Washington saying there was no cause for concern.

continued.