You mean Princess Haifa? She heads up the Breast Cancer Foundation in Arabia.. .. and works for several other charities for crippled children and continuing education for women. I like her very much.. Al bayumi's wife had serious breast cancer and 4 or 5 children.. Princess Haifa would help them financially.
Boy they sure do go into panick mode when the truth gets exposed.hee hee. their handlers hate it that the truth is going mainstream as well so they send them here to make fools out of themselves ignoring what top officials in government have to say and instead,worshipping the LAMESTREAM MEDIA as the god of all truth despite their long history of lying to the american people.
I dont know why you bother telling him that since he ignores evidence that jfk's assassination was an inside job as well.
you noticed that as well huh? Yeah the official conspiracy theory apologists always reveal their comedy ignoring the laws of physics scientists have gone by for thousands of years that every junior high school kid learns at that age and instead of listening to high qualified people,experts in their fields and high ranking government officials,they ignore what they have to say,the experts and worship what our corrupt government instituions and mainstream media tell them instead despite the fact they have DECADES OF CORRUPTION going on and that the media does not investigate news,that they are just a tool for the government.
No one ignores the laws of physics except you when asked which ones were ignored and how they were ignored. - - - Updated - - - There is no evidence whatsoever that 911 was an inside job you have failed miserably to present any evidence of any kind that it was.
There is an abundant amount of evidence 9/11 was an inside job. Try and answer the 50 questions raised in these videos. September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor
Of course questions are not evidence. My challenge to you is to answer the questions. The evidence for 9/11 being an inside job is presented in the video and 50 questions are asked of debunkers and official story believers. The evidence is abundant. The questions are hard. Debunk it if you can. Post your answers. September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor
It produces no evidence at all it produces assertions and then ignores the obvious answers. You nor anyone else has ever produced any evidence whatsoever of an inside job.
I suspected the questions they asked are too tough for truth debunkers on this forum. They take the professional debunkers to task. The Internet debunkers don't stand a chance.
Rather than hiding behind YouTube, pose the questions yourself one at a time. Be prepared to debate in a rational and adult manner.
You mean, be prepared to suffer the onslaught of personal attacks, gangland style insults, and one giant dance. Rational debate in an adult manner is the last thing the team wants.
No, I mean be prepared to debate in a rational manner, without insults or threats. 'Truthers' seem incapable of doing this.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Rationality or logical debate is the very last thing 'specialists' want.
Eye witness Lets abandon the second-hand reports, then, and look at what the witness to this filming actually said. This ABC article crops up a lot: Maria, who asked us not to use her last name, had a view of the World Trade Center from her New Jersey apartment building. She remembers a neighbor calling her shortly after the first plane hit the towers. She grabbed her binoculars and watched the destruction unfolding in lower Manhattan. But as she watched the disaster, something else caught her eye. Maria says she saw three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building. "They seemed to be taking a movie," Maria said. The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said. What struck Maria were the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange," she said. She found the behavior so suspicious that she wrote down the license plate number of the van and called the police. Before long, the FBI was also on the scene, and a statewide bulletin was issued on the van. The plate number was traced to a van owned by a company called Urban Moving. Around 4 p.m. on Sept. 11, the van was spotted on a service road off Route 3, near New Jersey's Giants Stadium. A police officer pulled the van over, finding five men, between 22 and 27 years old, in the vehicle. The men were taken out of the van at gunpoint and handcuffed by police. (ABC source) Theres nothing here to support the foreknowledge claim. The time frame as to when she noticed them is vague, but it definitely came after the call from a neighbour, which itself followed the first plane hitting the towers. Whats more, if you look at the full 20/20 transcript from which this story is derived, you find that Maria says she saw the van park after shed been watching the WTC for a few minutes. And so they did not film the first impact (or ar least, not from here). The report also talks about other issues involved with this story, so were reproducing the whole piece: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Dancing_Israelis Debunked years ago...........
the official FBI report and local police report proves there is nothing here. they had no explosives in their van. there is no evidence they set up their camera before the attack.
Nonsense. I'm just engaging in the only conversation that's possible here...indirect, non specific, and non pertinent rhetoric.