Israeli soldier gets 18 months for killing wounded Palestinian

No Ronstar. By definition, war crime can only occur during war.

 

I don't see anything wrong with executing a proven terrorists. As a matter of fact, the world be much better place if states introduced a law - anyone who engages in any sort of radical terrorism against other human beings automatically loses protection under human rights act and loses all legal rights prescribed under laws.

 

How can killing an ethnic cleansing maniac be considered terrorism? Seems you demand ethnic cleansers may not be harmed.

 

according to international law, no declared war is neccessary for a war crime to occur.

 

Personally I support Israelis mercilessly exterminating sneaking, honor-less human derbies Islamic terrorist scam, both standing up, or lying down. Preferably from far, before they have a chance to stab another sleeping girl, or elderly woman.

 

Indeed. So there is nothing wrong that an ethnic cleanser gets killed.

 

This is what the Nazis said in 1933.

they labeled their enemies "terrorists", and made it legal to kill them on sight.

 

As I said.... Where the pro Israel supporters demand that those Jewish ethnic cleansing thieving community must go forth with their war crimes and may not be touched at all.

 

I beg to disagree. Here's what wiki is saying:

"An undeclared war is a military conflict between two or more nations without either side issuing a formal declaration of war"

Bunch of Palestinians are not nation.

 

no declared war is neccessary for a war crime to have been committed

 

What kind of parent teaches their kids to throw rocks at children going to school? (3 minute mark) Terrorist parents, that's who. And were they punished - NO!
[video=youtube;T6zjnsaKXHg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6zjnsaKXHg[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

Yep, these settler children in the video above are trying to kill other children. And what is their punishment - nothing!

 

Typical behavior for Muslims and Nazis, and of course Israel isn't even remotely morally equivalent to either, so you're just stuck with yet another stupid analogy that doesn't exist.

 

analogizing Muslims with Nazis is dishonest and bigoted

 

It's not feasible to apply Israeli civil/criminal law on this case, if ever possible then he will certainly get 20 years jail, but it's a military conflict and is dealt with militarily.

 

Who said, they cannot be touched? Of course they may be touched. You can go and touch them. It's just that you'll be touched back, tenfold

 

And yet, you stay silent when it is the Jews who are analogized with Nazis. Why?

 

As I said... you lot demand ethnic cleansers may not be harmed, because they are Jewish and the victim is a muslim. The criminal in question is also a known racist who wanted a genocide. That kind of terror is what you defend.

 

Let's see; Kevlar helmets, body armour, stab vests. Yes I can see how much damage a stone could to to armour designed to stop knives, shrapnel and bullets

 

The way you put it makes the rock throwers look pretty stupid.

Just to be clear, if a Palestinian killed an unarmed Israeli, they would make him a hero!

 

Not Jews at all-- Zionist ISRAELIS. The two are not synonymous. Ask a non-Israeli Jew.

 

Exactly so. But on the positive side- the exposure of the ' culture of impunity ' probably recruited another few thousand converts to the anti-Zionist lobby.
Israel will strangle itself. All we need do is keep shining the spotlight.

 

Sigh, I've always suspected the Israeli government have been turning into soft pol-correct poodles over the years.

PS- The Brit govt are just as gutless, they jailed a Brit Marine for life for killing a wounded terrorist, you couldn't make it up!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26965823

 

How would you have sentenced the soldier who shot a helpless prisoner through the head, Johnny ?
Show us who you are.

 

Read the fascists' responses here;

 

If I'd have been the judge I'd have dismissed the case and let him walk free..