'It was a coup': Mueller critics demand 'deep state' investigation, Obama testimony

Governments are frequently overthrown, but the DP effort to nullify the 2016 election is more like the Munich beer hall putsch.
More beer might have helped the Mueller team.

 

That's why you bother to post

 

Its all part of the cycle. Accusations do not have to be true to have an effect. Its called poisoning the well. Birthers, collusionists, etc.

 

If you have illegally obtained FISA warrants it is.

If you unmask US citizens without any evidence of a crime on their part it is.

FISA warrants used on US citizens have a higher bar than just, "probable cause."

 

There was more than ample reason to investigate collusion, lumping that in with birtherism is idiotic

 

Fisa warrant was legal
So was unmasking

 

Baloney...

Crowdstrike was the worst of the contractors....

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3718776/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017-1.pdf

Hillary Clinton blackmailed Crowdstrike to say that it was the Russians who gave Wikileaks her e-mails. It wasn't the Russians.

 

Nonsense.

The warrants were not illegally obtained, and the documentation proves it.

"Unmasking"? back to that old canard?

Nope. Probable cause is the bar.

 

So why’s trump and his Intel agencies trying to frame Russia?
How’d crowdstrike plant evidence on the hackers computers?

 

Yet nobody has been fired or charged for any of that.

 

The IG Report will be out soon..... Get ready to EAT your words.

 

You guys said that after the last IG report about Hillary’s email invesigation. Zero charges came from it.

 

Mueller took Crowdstrike's word for it... Just like the FBI did after Clinton wrote the check for Crowdstrike's story.

That alone makes Mueller's report tainted.

Crowdstrike had access to NSA data that they had no clearance or authorization to be looking at.

Again, the FBI never examined the Clinton server.

 

Wow you should really consider reading the indictment of the hackers. Doesn’t even mention crowdstrike lol but does lay out tons of evidence
Why would there be nsa data on the server?

 

That was before Barr took over.

The Italians have already started their part of the purge.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...nisters-linked-to-spygate-and-trump-sabotage/

So Obama officials asked the Italian Intel agencies to spy on a member of the Trump campaign without any evidence of a potential crime. Barr is going to find out who it was.

 

So the IG does different work based on who the AG is? Lol

 

The "IG Report"?

The IG Report is certain to be a big nothingburger.

One of those BS Fantasies that the RW fever Swamp hypes (that fizzles out) like the "Hillary in cuffs" fairy tale.

Keep hoping though.

 

Given that no one was charged with collusion, there obviously wasn't ample grounds to investigate it.

"Russia collusion" has assumed its rightful place in the Pantheon of Tinfoil, and the people who pushed it are no better than Birthers, 9/11 Troofers, Flat Earthers, et al.

 

Clinton's e-mails were not hacked. The information was downloaded. Mueller's team was a FIREWALL.

The good news is that Mueller turned tail and ran when he knew he couldn't collect from the cash cow any longer.

Nadler isn't going to be able to protect the scum like Mueller was able to.

 

Actually they are worse because they used the FISA warrant information within the DC Grand Jury setting.

 

So since nobody was charged with Hillary’s server....
Nah we both know you’re not bound by consistency lol

 

The IG isn't a prosecutor. Dunham is the prosecutor that Barr has assigned to find out who did what.

 

The IG can recommend charges

 

There are Republicans that don't like Trump.

And there were Democrats that didn't like Obama.

What's your point?

 

If your opinion is there was "ample" reason to investigate, there is also "ample" reason to investigate the investigation. Many on this forum were convinced there was collusion just as many were convinced Obama was not born here. The next part of the ugly cycle will be the coup-ers!