Nice to see that some climate scientific are admitting that climate variability is affected by more than minute increases in a trace gas. So many factors involved which explains why the unverified and unvalidated computer models are so inaccurate http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/press/press_releases/press_release.php?id=2452
Ah but after discounting the effect that the positive PDO and its progeny the El Nino has on global temperatures the warmmongers will hide behind the negative PDO driving strong La Nina events as an excuse to keep from admitting that they were wrong. This of course begs the question, if a negative PDO bringing about frequent strong La Nina's has dwarfed the AGW signal then shouldn't the positive PDO and the frequent strong El Nino's it brings have just as strong of a positive effect? If we are to reassess the effect of the ENSO then we must reassess both phase not the the negative phase.
Climate catastrophists don't find it complicated at all, they just follow the leader, like good sheeple.
