Notice when I expose the Tramp press release report as fake and cite the actual BLS data, the Right shift to a different fake source with an even bigger lie. There were 158,803,000 total employed in Dec and 158,714,000 in Jan. The actual data directly from the BLS: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm
I do! But only to people that I meet and really need it.. I'm a huge softy for Women cancer patients with children.. I have found in this area the POS husband at some point bolt and leave them, and I hate it! And that's all I'm going to post on that!!
And a loss of 89,000 people employed from the actual data. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm If there were 225,000 to 291,000 "NEW" jobs created in Jan, then how could there be 89,000 LESS people employed in Jan???? Curious minds want to know!!!!!
That report does not include the Household Survey data "- December - January changes in household data are not shown due to the introduction of updated population controls." And the number releases AS ALWAYS is the non-farm payrolls not total US employment. And at that look at the private sector, it went up.
"Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract' https://www.investing.com/news/econ...ing-obama-era-part-time,-contract-work-449057
But the leftist bought that "Hook line and sinker" and the funny part is, they bought that shlt while he rocked a 1.8 GDP! Even a moron could have put that bullshit together ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
From my link: Employment Situation Summary Table A. Household data, seasonally adjusted And it IS the total non-farm payrolls!
That FAKE report has been discredited even by its authors! When the PPACA passed in Mar 2010 there were 9,233,000 working PT for economic reasons, and 5,734,000 when Obama left. That is a pretty steep DECLINE, don't you think?
We were on the backside of the recession which began a year after he and his fellow Democrats took back the Congress and lame ducked Bush in 2007. The job loss rate bottomed out the month he moved over to the White House and began a steep curve in the opposite direction before any of Obama's stimulus. Fortunately the Republicans began taking back power and business got us at least into a slow recovery in spite of Obama and the Democrats and with Trump's policies we now see one of if not the strongest economies ever.
not really. Republicans killed every single bill from 2001-2007 that attempted to regulate fanny/freddy. yes they were stupid, but so were banks for giving them a loan. no it wasn't. the data doesn't support what you are saying, like it usually doesn't.
I quoted from your link "Employment status Civilian noninstitutional population" - December - January changes in household data are not shown due to the introduction of updated population controls.
Well you're getting better, I'll give you that.. But you might ask yourself WHY were they trying to push more oversite thru and why Barney Frank was so against it and telling the public that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were strong and there was nothing to worry about
Frank was a POWERLESS member of the MINORITY party in the GOP controlled House where the GOP Congress killed every reform bill in committee!
No deflection, I see your post and I see your dismay at the idea of improvement and your gleeful attempts to nullify it ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
YouTube videos don’t alter reality. here is the congressional voting record for every bill proposed from 2001-2007, attempting to regulate fanny/Freddy. Every single one killed by republicans. https://financialservices.house.gov...11/timeline_for_fannie_freddie_regulation.pdf as I said, the data as usual is against you.