John Durham indicts one Muh Rushan Clooshun hoaxer

Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussman has been indicted for lying to the FBI when passing political campaign opposition research to the FBI to start an investigation.

Sussman indicated to the FBI he was NOT working for the Hillary Campaign when telling the FBI that Trump's organization was communicating with a Russian bank (which turned out to be completely false anyway).

Durham Indictment Is in and It's Big After All
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/09/16/durham-indictment-is-in-and-its-big-after-all-n444122
Sussman then allegedly pressed reporters to write about the Alfa Bank allegation and accused a NY Times reporter of not thoroughly investigating Trump.

The FBI found the Alfa Bank claim was nonsense — that the server in question “was not owned or operated by the Trump Organization, but, rather, had been administered by a mass marketing email company that sent advertisements for Trump’s hotels and hundreds of other clients.”

Then there was this fascinating bit of information in the indictment — that they may have accessed “non-public information” about Trump and coordinated with the Clinton campaign. The “tech executive” was, according to the indictment, promised a job in the Clinton administration that never came to be.

 

He was indicted for making a false statement to the FBI.

There have been multiple threads about it already

 

And what would he gain from that? Seems like he was directed to do so. In fact, what did he gain personally for any of the things he was doing. I can name many ways the Clinton campaign and dnc gained tho

 

It was part of a broad plan to cook up a baseless narrative to use against Trump to effect the election, and to use as a pretense for spying on Trump's campaign, and then after the election, to try and remove Trump from office, at which point it became a coup attempt.

 

Wrong thread

 

With any luck we will find out. I am glad they indicted him and I hope he gets the same treatment all those connected to Trump got for this same crime

 

Deal as long as the blm rioters get the same treatment as the Jan 6 rioters

 

They should. When they break into a Govt building in an attempt to stop the peaceful transfer of power, I they should get the same treatment

 

You know how this works. You can’t assume what someone’s intent was. Unless you have evidence each and every one of them intended to stop the constitutional process, you can’t assert that they did. At least not logically

 

Jonathan Turley wrote, which was quoted in the article:

Even for those of us who followed and wrote on the Russia investigation for five years, much has been revealed in the last year. It was disclosed in October, for instance, that President Obama was briefed by his CIA director, John Brennan, on July 28, 2016, on intelligence suggesting that Hillary Clinton planned to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” [….]

Throughout the campaign, the Clinton campaign denied any involvement in the creation of the so-called Steele dossier’s allegations of Trump-Russia connections. However, weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the dossier made to a research firm, Fusion GPS, as “legal fees” among the $5.6 million paid to the campaign’s law firm. New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias, with the law firm of Perkins Coie, denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias “pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.’” Times reporter Maggie Haberman declared, “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year.”

It was not just reporters who asked the Clinton campaign about its role in the Steele dossier. John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman, was questioned by Congress and denied categorically any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS. Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.

This all, of course, ultimately led to the Mueller scam. Sussman was also the attorney that recommended his pal's firm, Crowdstrike, to the DNC to "investigate" the DNC "hack" - which was most likely a leak by Seth Rich.

 

I watched them do it. It was broadcast live on TV. What more do I need?

 

Whist they are ignoring the 34 people and three companies indicted under the Mueller investigation

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury

Still I suppose if this is all you have……

 

They broke into a government building

 

I do recall a lot of talk about "process crimes" and how they meant nothing.

Odd how that has changed now

 

Odd that….

 

Who was indicted for colluding with Russia?

 

They were mostly indicted for the exact same thing this guy was. Back then we were told they were "process crimes" and meant nothing at all.

Why has that suddenly changed?

 

Is there someone in particular who you're referring to? Flynn's entrapment? Or George Papadopoulos?

 

Damn, I live it when you prove me correct!

Thanks!

 

How did I prove you correct? I asked you a question.

 

No you watched them riot. Your ASSERTION is they did so in order to stop the democratic process.

 

They did stop the democratic process.

 

And blm riots resulted in dead cops. Should they all be charged with murder?

 

Just the ones involved in the killing, just like not all the people that went into the Capital Building are being arrested or charged, just a small number of them

 

It hasn't changed at all, the principle accusation was that Trump colluded with a foreign power to be elected. That was the WHOLE fing point of the investigation. And yet, to this day, no Ruskies. No collusion, no conspiracy, none of that. Just a whitewashing of the event literally by the disgrace that is the FBI.