Kobach: Texas Case Challenges Election Directly at Supreme Court

The questionable ballots in the States being sued were in such small number that even if removed would not have changed the election outcomes in those states.
There is no standing and there is no basis for this suit and you will learn this. So Trumps efforts to steal the presidency will fail.

 

They may have so the voter is not the issue but the last minute changes by unauthorized entities that allowed the degradation of security allowing fraud by those so inclined. The changes made it impossible to verify the vote tally. Lack of chain of custody, lack of signature matching, and disruption or ignoring of counting processes. The illegal votes dilutes valid votes. That is true for states and electors; thus, the Texas lawsuit.

 

You have evidently yet to read the lawsuit.

 

This is the same quote you come up with over and over all over the board.. How lame. But you have failed to contest what what I have said. You "evidently" have yet to learn how to post

 

If all that’s indeed true (I’m not well versed on the specifics of this) then it creates a great quandary for the Supreme Court. It’s certainly not a case of simply saying “the law was unconstitutional”. How to balance the 2 conflicting imperatives - follow the law and avoid disenfranchising voters? Not at all simple. Unless significant evidence of fraud, rather than conjecture, is presented, I find it hard to imagine the Supreme Court taking an interventionist stance. But I guess we’ll see.

 

[

 

The lawsuit, if taken, is outcome determinative. You would know this if you read the case.

 

Lol so if the Supreme Court doesn't take the Case what does it matter. The case itself is pure junk. Texas and other states have no standing and no basis for this asinine case. And once again your post has offered 0 defense for anything I have said. Let me know when you want want to contest anything I've said in my posts. I'll be happy to show you how it's done because. You need the training

You forget that the State of Texas and it's pals have absolutely no right to interfere with the elections of other States ( the ones being sued) even through the Supreme Court. Also what happened in the States being sued had 0 effect on Texas own state election and the Presidential Election in general., The questionable ballots in the States being sued were in such small number that even if removed would not have changed the election outcomes in those states or in the general election.

 

The case is not about fraud but about constitutional process. States that did not follow constitutional or state statutes diluted election security which effects final vote tally in specific areas, mainly mail in voting which has long been considered the most insecure. This makes verification of legal votes literally impossible. This affects states that did follow constitutional and state statutes; thus, the Texas lawsuit with 18 states joining.

 

Must be why SCOTUS ordered the defendant states to respond by today.

 

They ordered the defendant in Mike Kelly v Pennsylvania to respond as well. Expect same result.

 

This is a hack statement with 0 basis in reality ..You have failed to prove that verification of legal votes were literally impossible since they already have been verified and counted. .Do you really think the Supreme Court will take this up on the basis of pure B.S. and hack claims already proven to be false.. . Everyone of your complaints about ballots were laughed out of all the State Courts. The State of Texas and it's pals have absolutely no right to interfere with the elections of other States ( the ones being sued) even through the Supreme Court. Also whatever happened in the States being sued had 0 effect on Texas' own state election and the Presidential Election in general.,
There is no standing and there is no basis for this suit and you will learn this. So Trumps efforts to steal the presidency will fail.

 

What does that have to do with anything?. Do you realize not once have you contested anything I've said. Thus you pretty much agree with me or .realize your own reasoning to be weak.

 

How long before the SCOTUS throws this out so that we can all watch Trump lose the election again?

I'm gonna take a stab at it and say sometime tomorrow since the electoral college vote takes place on Monday.

What say y'all?

 

Not sure what you mean by that. Logical people understand.

Gore got WAY less votes than he was expected to get in PBC, while Buchanan got WAY more votes then he was expected to get. They proved, over and over, that a slight user alignment issue likely caused the problem. So, there was clearly an issue, but there was nothing to do be done about it, so we, as a country, moved on.

Biden won, fair and square, and like I had to tell lefties for a couple of years, Trump won, get over it. Now I'm rinse/repeating the same thing, only to whiny cult worshipers this time.

 

JFC. Seriously.

The ballots received after the deadline WERE NOT COUNTED IN THE ORIGINAL FINAL COUNT, and will not be counted in any recount. There were 10,000 of them and NONE of them were actually counted !!!!!!

Your arguing something you apparently know nothing about.

 

You mean like that never happened.

 

These blokes have.






Go to the 1.16 mark here:

 

Look at my post 1187. I hate to brag but I think I was pretty much on the money.

 

I believe they were and that is the issue.

 

Since when can't states sue other state?

 

Nothing to support your claim and if there was a case to made the postal service was going to be slow then it is the state legislature who has SOLE authority to remedy it not the courts not local and state election officials, what don't you understand about unconstitutional?

 

That make no sense. All the ballots in the states being sued have been verified and counted. Does that mean if someone claims that there are 100 illicit ballots in Texas Wisconsin and PA gets to sue Texas in the Supreme Court? Your query has no end in sight and you have absolutely no courage to tell us at what point you would be satisfied. On and on you go. .

 

Great video, Bush

Like my man Krug said ... these rotten republican rat bastards want to turn this country into Hungary...

https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1337098618424205315

Will be delicious watching the Supremes throw them out of court on their filthy rotten republican faces...

 

Amazing he still doesn't comprehend that.... It's right there on the Pa elections website.

OTOH, at some point, long after Biden is POTUS and Trump has been indicted, the SCOTUS is likely to finally take up the Boockvar case and determine if the SOS (confirmed by the PA SC) had the ability to extend the receipt date past election date due to a Republican manufactured crisis.

If they do, those votes should be retroactively counted and added to the Pa total for posterity, as they were all cast by election day.

If they don't, you'll see every half wit on here claiming once again the election was STOLEN by uncounted ballots.... bank on it...