Kyle Rittenhouse acquitted: Protests erupt from New York to California: LIVE UPDATES

LOL, only in your mind.

 

Oh? Please post where you proved your claim.

 

You claimed it was a "fact", but now it's opinion?

 

Re:

The words we use are supposed to be accurate and have meaning if we intend to be taken seriously.

Therefore, unless Kyle is a card carrying National Socialist who was alive from the 1920s to 1945, he cannot be a "nazi".

Anyone after 1945 who adheres to National Socialist dress and doctrines may be accurately labeled as a "Neo Nazi" but since Kyle exhibits none of those unflattering characteristics referring to him as a "Neo Nazi" too is inaccurate.

If your political orientation compels you to slander this seemingly decent young man please try to characterize him more accurately.

Thanks,

 

The judge sees it as a fact that he got drunk with far right wingers and flashed WP signs. I sourced it.
So how can it be my opinion?

 

4chan.org is your source, and that's all we needed to know.

 

I sourced that the judge ruled differently.

 

I don't understand how that relates to your regarding Kyle R. as a "nazi".

I can understand if you want to characterize Kyle as "trigger happy", a "gun nut" or even a "White supremacist" but I don't see how he exhibits any of the traits of a National Socialist from the 1920s - 1945.

The words we use are supposed to accurately communicate what we mean to say. Calling Kyle a "nazi" is as inaccurate as calling him a "**********", a "gook" or other racist epithet.

Please clarify,

Thanks,

 

He got busted to be friends with nazi's by drinking with them, and posing with them for pictures while showing gang sings. A judged ruled on it to be true, and he wasn't allowed to do that if he wanted to be out on bail.

This really should be nothing new.

I already sourced that PB is a neo-fascist group. I fail to see problem to call such people "nazi's".

 

I get it. You are not interested in the facts.

 

I sourced my facts. You did not.

 

Re:

At least I see it as confusing Kyle and others with real National Socialists of the 1920s - 1945.

Since Kyle and the people he was associating with displayed no swastikas etc, I don't see where it's accurate to even regard them as Neo Nazis.

I assume that you do want what you write to be accurate, don't you?

 

You source partial fact and drew a ridiculous and irrational opinion.

 

Nope. I sourced the entire page, and nothing in it was able to be used to dispute my claim. There was nothing partial about it. While you also did not to prove me wrong with a source of your own.

 

Well, except for the facts you might have something.

 

The judge accepted the facts. It's just you who doesn't lol.

 

I get it. You think you’re opinion is fact. Not any need for facts in your world.

 

The judge accepted the facts.

 

That’s why Rittenhouse is free. Get a clue.

 

Because you are posting a lie.

The judge saw no such thing

he flashed no Wp sign

 

You are willfully posting lies not facts

 

That's why I get to call him a nazi. Get a clue of my point.

 

You calll him a nazi because you have no intelligent or valid argument and not enough maturity to admit when you are wrong.

 

I've already sourced that the judge altered the guys bail conditions over those facts.
I'm not interested in your alternative reality.

 

You sourced nothiing whatspeevr backing up your fallacy.

I am stating facdts it is you projecting and trying desperately to make your spin legitimate