Let's terminate the Constitution!!

Again, look up constructive possession

 

Intent has to be established to convict him. Ignorance of what was in the boxes someone else packed and moved to Mar-a-Lago is a plausible defense. But maybe he should check with the bidens on plausible deniability as a good defense.

 

I've already responded. Reply if you can.

 

Personal letters written during his time as Pres, for instance the letters to his ****buddy in NK, are still government property because he wrote those letters in his official capacity as President.

Again, read the Presidential Records Act.

 

I'm pretty sure this has been covered already.

 

No.

 

Kind of hard to say you didn't know they were there when he admitted to knowingly taking them, refused to respond to requests for them, and refused to obey a subpoena for them. But keep getting creative.

 

I'm not trying to convict him. I don't need to. He is doing a bang-up job of convicting himself.

 

Magazines.

 

Not by Trump's defenders it hasn't

 

Constructive possession

 

Then what was the purpose of a SM?

 

Do a forum search.

 

Even the SM saw no reason for an SM in this case. There was no legitimate purpose.

 

Depends. List an example

 

A rich request from someone who proudly proclaims they won't look up basic legal concepts. But no, they haven't addressed it. I've looked.

 

I can't think of what's stopping Lil Mike from posting "Trump's post" here, can you, yardmeat?

 

Not true. Waiting for you to find my quotes.

 

Posting "Trump's post" is one of the first things I did.
Curious what point you are trying to make @DEFinning

 

Except that he was too easily intimidated. If he was willing to completely drop out of the race, just because of rumors about Republican "dirty tricks," at his daughter's wedding, how easy would it have been to bend him, with threats?

Had he not dropped out, I believe he would have won.

 

Then you now he advocated terminating parts of the Constitution.

 

OK that's some awkward sentence structure. Could you clean that up a little?

 

My bad on the typo. It was supposed to be "know" instead of "now." Then you KNOW he advocated terminating parts of the Constitution.

 

OK that seems out of context to our conversation. You were supposed to bring me quotes that I had made defending Trump's comments. Still waiting.

 

You refused to respond to what I said about that. But you could always go back to the post I was actually quoting. It's pretty easy to follow.