Linda Sarsour Asks Muslims To Form "Jihad" Against Trump, Not To Assimilate

More likely a Muslim fanatic pretending to be a Western progressive.

 

How can you be sure "she" isn't a white boy?

 

Useless Only;

She's a RADICAL as any American in History. Get it straight.

You must be just as proud of those little hands you have

 

Oh noes, a radical, run for your lives.

Not to mention the ideological car crash of her detractors, most of whom have their story from second hand cheese salesmen.

I make full use of my hands, often finger gesticulating towards persons with little minds.

 

You and the Trump Haters use your hands to dream up these rants

 

No, I watched her speech rather than depend on some bell end journalist with a homophobic slant, but I can see how that might appeal to frightened minds.

 

Trump praised the victory in the former ISIS stronghold.

President Donald Trump on Monday hailed the "victory" of Iraqi forces over the Islamic State group in the northern city of Mosul.

The retaking of the devastated city after nearly nine months of fighting signals the jihadist group's "days in Iraq and Syria are numbered," Trump said in a statement, praising Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

Mosul was strategically and financially important to ISIS -- al-Baghdadi declared the IS Caliphate while in Mosul in 2011.

The Daily Star claims that it is "confirmed" that al-Baghdadi was killed in previous airstrikes (by RUSSIA!!!), and that a new "caliph" is being chosen. They claim ISIS itself confirms his death.

Al Sumaria TV channel reported terrorists have admitted their leader was killed in air strikes in the Iraqi province of Nineveh.

And now the respected Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it had "confirmed information" that Al-Baghdadi has been killed.

His death will come as a damaging blow to ailing ISIS, who are being forced back in de-facto capital Raqqa and have been defeated in Mosul.

Various reports have previously said the jihadi boss was dead, however this is the first time ISIS has confirmed the news.

There are still holdouts in the city, now being hunted down:

Sporadic clashes have continued in the city of Mosul, despite the Iraqi government's declaration of victory against so-called Islamic State there. The US-led coalition supporting Iraqi forces said they were rooting out a "handful" of militants in the Old City.

This New York Times article -- click at peril to your immortal soul, but it has good pictures- - documents the massive destruction ISIS left behind, like a storm of murderous locusts. Much (but not all) of the city appears to be mostly rubble now -- looks like it will have to be rebuilt virtually from scratch.

Scan down for a picture of a demolished church, and a pink, kitty-cat child's backpack containing C4 explosives.

Nice guys!

The BBC (link before the prior one) notes:

The UN says that of the 54 residential districts in the western half of Mosul - where the Old City is located - 15 are heavily damaged and 23 moderately damaged.

I enjoyed this -- "Half-Naked ISIS 'Fanatic' Captured and Paraded Out In Front of Crowds."Half-naked is a bit misleading; he's merely shirtless.

Still, it's gratifying.

The half-naked ISIS fanatic already has offers in to speak at 2020's DNC just before Linda Sarsour, and also is being courted to host an MSNBC weekend show.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/370597.php

 

Here's more:

https://thefederalist.com/2017/07/21/linda-sarsour-proves-shes-unhinged-murderer-apologist/

Linda Sarsour Proves She’s An Unhinged Murderer Apologist
Activist Linda Sarsour’s 'resume,' Tapper’s condemnation of her, and their subsequent Twitter exchange illustrate the extent to which this darling of the progressive Left—and her followers—are unhinged.
Bradley Martin
By Bradley Martin
JULY 21, 2017
When Jake Tapper, CNN’s chief washington correspondent, slammed Linda Sarsour and other progressive leaders of the anti-Trump Women’s March for honoring convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur, Sarsour proceeded to dismiss Tapper as “alt-right.”

Of all the possible ways to describe Tapper, “alt-right” is not one. Tapper is one of President Trump’s most vocal critics. And he’s Jewish. Someone should tell Sarsour this would likely disqualify him for membership in any white supremacist group. But Sarsour’s “resume,” Tapper’s condemnation of her, and their subsequent Twitter exchange illustrate the extent to which this darling of the progressive Left—and her progressive Left followers—are unhinged.

This Murderer Is So Awesome, Guys

Shakur is a felon, convicted in 1977 for murdering a New Jersey police officer, assaulting another police officer, and bank robbery. In 1979 she escaped prison and fled to Cuba. She remains on the FBI’s “Most Wanted Terrorist” list to this day.

Sarsour’s idolizing of Shakur follows on the heels of her presentation at the 54th annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America, where she called on Muslims to commit jihad against the American government.

“I hope that we, when we stand up to those who oppress our [Muslim] communities, that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad,” said Sarsour. “That we are struggling against tyrants and rulers, not only abroad in the Middle East or on the other side of the world, but here, in these United States of America.”

In an interview soon after with The Washington Post, Sarsour was quick to clarify that her speech at ISNA was advocating solely for peaceful, nonviolent dissent, and that her call for jihad only meant the use of words. In a later op-ed for the publication, Sarsour doubled down on her claim that she was only calling for “nonviolent” jihad.


“Yeah, and the swastika is just a Tibetan good luck charm,” as the late comedian Robin Williams so eloquently put it.

But I Also Love Mass Murderers and Their Inciters
Sarsour began her ISNA presentation by thanking her “favorite person” in the room, Imam Siraj Wahaj, praising him as her “mentor, motivator and encourager.” Wahaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, has called for violent jihad and replacing the U.S. government with an Islamic caliphate. Sarsour’s mentor has also denounced homosexuality as “a disease of this [American] society,” noting that the penalty for homosexuality under Islamic law is death.

But this doesn’t seem right. How can such a self-declared progressive proponent of social justice have such a violent homophobic bigot for a mentor? Maybe ISNA can shed some light on this glaring contradiction.

Federal prosecutors have said that ISNA is part of the U.S Muslim Brotherhood network set up to funnel money to the terrorist group Hamas. ISNA conferences have long featured radical Islamists, anti-Semites, Holocaust-deniers, and homophobes as keynote speakers. An exclusive video from PJ Media shows al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, just days before the 9/11 terror attacks, lecturing on “tolerance” at that year’s ISNA convention.


At this year’s ISNA convention, a pro-LGBT and feminist Muslim organization was expelled from tabling. Muslims for Progressive Values, whose pamphlets advocate for LGBT and women’s equality within Islam, drew the ire of an ultra-orthodox attendee, resulting in ISNA staff asking MPV to close shop and vacate the venue.

“We’re really sick and tired of the hypocrisy of them [ISNA] claiming to be LGBT allies,” said Ani Zonneveld, founder and president of MPV. “They’re only an ally when the camera is on.”

Strangely, Sarsour hasn’t uttered one word of protest, despite vocally leading a national march and “movement” against what the Resistance calls President Trump’s anti-LGBT regime. But to be fair, she may have been too busy swindling Jewish cemeteries out of their money. Back in March, an organization connected to Sarsour pledged $100,000 to conduct necessary repairs at a Colorado Jewish cemetery. The money has yet to arrive.

Also, People Who Disagree With Me Should Be Brutalized
The ever-so-peaceful, nonviolent Sarsour has called for the genital mutilation of women who disagree with her. In 2011, this self-described progressive feminist tweeted against Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel, an Arab Christian survivor of the Lebanese Civil War, stating they did not deserve to be women and that she wanted to take away their vaginas.


This is especially vile considering that Ali was a victim of female genital mutilation as a five-year-old in Somalia. When a student confronted Sarsour about the tweet, she attacked him for being a white man.

Sarsour’s latest Twitter argument confirms that she doesn’t really care about racial equality, LGBT rights, or the rights of women. For all of her screeching at critics to “check their privilege,” a better idea would be for Sarsour to check her gigantic ego at the door.

Bradley Martin is a fellow with the news and public policy group Haym Salomon and deputy editor for the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research.

 

People who try to use jihad in it's original definition, which means defending Islam against attackers, need to understand that after years of Islamic extremism, that is no longer the accepted definition. Just like calling someone mentally retarded is no longer acceptable, even though mental retardation used to be the textbook phrase for someone who is mentally slow. Years of it being misused changed it's accepted definition.

 

Space_Time

I did not seeing any links in that article that cited actual quotes from her where she says the things the author says. Forgive me if I have problem believing a lot of that just on the author who obvious hates her to begin with says she did.

Especially since Bradley Martin has a long history of purpose misquoting and taking statesments out of context to meet his own views and discredit the person he's quoting.

 

"People who try to use jihad in it's original definition, which means defending Islam against attackers". Who are these "people" who told you this was the original meaning of Jihad?

 

Which is why they should be rejected.

 

The links are in the original article.

 

Does that mean no Christmas Tree, Santa Claus and x-mas presents for Muslim children?

How about the 4th of July?


Moi
My Jewish parents were assimilationist
as were their parents pre WW1.
I am grateful to have celebrated the above holidays as holidays.

r > g

Across an immense, unguarded, ethereal border, Canadians, cool and unsympathetic,
regard our America with envious eyes and slowly and surely draw their plans against us. ​

 

Shipping her out is being kind. She is calling for a war against America.

Shipping her out is too kind. She is trying to insight a war or terrorism in America. She needs to be something other than shipped out.
And I am not a supporter of Trump.

 

Constantly changing the meaning of words is part of the problem.

 

Does that mean no social services?

 

She grew up steeped in MLK rhetoric and has never once advocated for violence.

That truth, however, is subject to alteration when it meets the frightened, insecure, entitled white man and their barely conscious spokeholes like Tucker Carlson, a 'journalist' much admired by sundry white supremacist idiots.

Jihad, for the gormless and ill-informed, is merely a word to describe spiritual struggle.

The same thing conservative Christians would go through, were they conscious, every time they waft past the homeless on their way to church.

 

Here's more:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/27/linda-sarsour-is-molding-the-left-in-her-own-image/
Linda Sarsour Is Molding The Left In Her Own Image
Photo of Scott Greer
SCOTT GREER
Deputy Editor
12:26 AM 07/27/2017
652 652 Share
The most prominent movement dedicated to “resisting” the presidency of Donald Trump announced last week it considers a cop killer a hero.

The official Women’s March Twitter account wished convicted murder and unapologetic terrorist Assata Shakur a happy birthday. The tweet drew immediate backlash from conservatives, which prompted the group that counts as one of its leaders the rising left-wing star Linda Sarsour, to explain its decision to show support for someone as odious as Shakur.

Women’s March didn’t apologize for the tweet, didn’t condemn murders of police officers and didn’t swear off violence as a political tactic in its tweet storm in response to the outrage. All the group said was that it prefers non-violence and it primarily honors Shakur for fighting against sexism within her black power terror group, the Black Liberation Army.

What a noble endeavor.

The odious endorsement was met mostly with silence from the bigger news outlets and liberal pundits. But a lone exception to the case was CNN anchor Jake Tapper, who attacked Women’s March for praising a cop killer hiding from justice in Cuba.

That attack drew a sharp reply from Sarsour, who accused Tapper of joining the ranks of the Alt-Right with his criticism. That might be one of the silliest responses to a prominent voice calling them out for glorifying a terrorist. (RELATED: Linda Sarsour Says Jake Tapper Is A White Nationalist)

For one, Tapper, who leans left and is Jewish, is nowhere near the Alt-Right on the political spectrum. Secondly, just about every average American would have a problem with turning a murderous terrorist into a hero.

But this was the argument Sarsour chose, and it convinced several people to flood Tapper’s twitter feed with angry accusations of racism — because only a bigot would have a problem with Assata Shakur, apparently.

Last week’s controversy was only the latest of many uproars caused by Sarsour. Earlier in July, Sarsour raised eyebrows after she called for a jihad against President Donald Trump. Considering the term’s popular meaning in the West, it was bound to shock Americans that someone would deploy a term used to justify Islamic terror in an effort to rally against the leader of the country.

However, Sarsour counted many supporters among the punditocracy, and critics were shouted down with cries of Islamophobia. The activist herself blamed “conservative media” for the outrage and said she was only calling for speaking truth to power, not violence. (RELATED: Linda Sarsour Defends Her Use Of Jihad)

In March, Sarsour said one can not both be a feminist and a Zionist. Many Jewish feminists were offended by the declaration, and some wondered if that kind of rhetoric made her best suited to lead a women’s movement. But remain a feminist leader she did, with a few Zionist feminists coming to her defense.

Then, there are her past comments praising sharia law and demanding the vaginas of Islam critics Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel be taken away. It’s odd for a feminist leader to be a fan of a system that oppresses women, but neither the celebration of sharia nor her vulgar criticism of political opponents has dimmed her star among liberals.

Nor has her ties to other murderous extremists done anything to dampen her support. Besides Shakur, Women’s March has also associated with Rasmea Odeh, a convicted Palestinian terrorist, and Donna Hylton, a political radical who participated in the torture and murder of a New York man in the 1980s.

Liberals, however, have largely ignored these repugnant ties and have been happy to dismiss Sarsour’s comments and stances as right-wing smears and nothing more.

The Women’s March leader’s surprising ability to overcome these controversies and associations that would have doomed someone in her position only a few years ago speaks volumes to the changing nature of the Left.

She has forced liberals to defend positions and ideas that they would have balked at supporting previously. Praising terrorists as heroes, check. Advocating for jihad and sharia, check. Having no problem with violence towards police, check. Being openly anti-Israel, check.

The reason that sensible liberals would have tried to keep their distance from these stances is due to how much they alienate regular Americans. It’s not a good campaign when you have to spend your whole time fielding questions on Assata Shakur.

Yet, three prominent Democratic senators — two of whom are possible contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020 and who publicly expressed support for Sarsour and her cause — have shown no effort to disavow her. (RELATED: Dem Senators Decline To Condemn Women’s March For Supporting Terrorist)

There is the likelihood that Sarsour is able to get away with her radicalism due to the deep desire liberals have for a leader like her. A member of one of the minority communities Trump and those evil right-wingers look at suspiciously. A feminist who proudly wears her hijab — no matter the contradictions of that situation. A charismatic figure who can bring together white yuppies and minority radicals together for mass demonstration.

Sarsour offers these opportunities, and the Left doesn’t seem to want to give up on her leadership over a few radical ties. Besides, they don’t want a person of color accusing them of being racist like Jake Tapper was. The most terrifying thing for a white liberal is a respected minority accusing them of racism.

But the Left has a major problem by standing with Sarsour when it forces them to take a whole bunch of positions that are not going to play well at election time. It might not matter when yuppies are out LARPing resistance to care about Sarsour’s support for Shakur, but it is going to matter when Kamala Harris is running for president.

There are only so many people you can shame with “RACIST!” smears to get them to shut up about embracing a cop-killing terrorists. Most Americans don’t want Assata Shakur and Rasmea Odeh to be inspirational figures.

Does the Left disagree with that?

Follow Scott on Twitter and purchase his new book, “No Campus for White Men.”

 

Here's more:

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2017/09/the-amazing-color-changing-linda-sarsour.html


Monday, September 04, 2017Elder of ZiyonLinda Sarsour

The amazing color-changing Linda Sarsour


On Friday I noted that Linda Sarsour claimed to be a "woman of color" in this tweet where she tried to deflect criticism about her attempts to divert Hurricane Harvey aid funds for her pet political projects:




I made fun of her at the time, asking her if her wishing that she wanted to remove Ayyan Hirsi Ali's vagina if she was "smearing a woman of color."


31 Aug

Linda Sarsour ✔ @lsarsour

Texas Organizing Project is not my PAC, but who cares about facts when you are white supremacists obsessed w/ smearing women of color. ‍♀️ https://twitter.com/davis1988will/status/902964647883628545 …

ElderOfZiyon @elderofziyon

Just curious, @lsarsour - when you said you wanted to remove @Ayaan Hirsi Ali's vagina, were you smearing a woman of color?

11:23 AM - Sep 1, 2017

1 1 Reply 42 42 Retweets 101 101 likes


Today I made a poster making fun of Sarsour's pretending to be a "person of color" while Jews of any color are always considered "white."


What I didn't realize is that the photo I used in this poster came from a video about hijab published by Vox earlier this year, where Sarsour was featured. And in this video she says, explicitly, that before she put on her hijab she was just "some ordinary white girl from New York City."


ElderOfZiyon @elderofziyon

Before putting on her hijab, Linda Sarsour admits she was white. Now she claims to be a "person of color." Neat trick! @lsarsour

1:35 PM - Sep 4, 2017

615 615 Replies 1,870 1,870 Retweets 3,127 3,127 likes


Sarsour magically changed from white to a "woman of color" in an instant!


She's the new Rachel Dolezal!


By the way, you are not allowed to criticize my blog anymore. I wear a yarmulka, which make me a "Jew of color" and therefore immune to criticism. At least by the logic of some people.

 

Speaking as a person who doesn't really like islam, or any other religion for that matter, I find it perfectly obvious what she is talking about; she is saying that she hopes that their resistance to the hatred coming from people like Donald Trump towards muslims will in the eyes of their god be counted as a proper spiritual struggle.

At no point does she ever come close to advocating war against the US.

 

Who really cares what a pseudo-intellectual, self-important, grand stander thinks? She's no more, or no less, than anyone else.

All she has is one vote and one vote only.

She'll be forgotten after some other silly grand stander grabs the limelight for their fifteen minutes.