Looking for honest peer !

Not quite , they weren't idiots ! They got a bit carried away and started to misinterpreting the physics . Newton recognized space time before Einstein did . Einstein just reworded Newtons work and added some bad semantics .

In reality relative space-time occupies absolute space ! Space is independent of space - time .

 

NO. Einstein demonstrated that Newton was wrong except for in special circumstances. Newton's concept of space was wrong.

Now, you come along and suggest that Einstein was wrong!!!

And, you have to do more than play word games to support that idea.

 

I've already done the research , Einstein is wrong !

The seven postulates are axioms .

Einstein never proved Newton wrong to begin with . Einstein just created another theory that had no real facts .

There is no evidence that space is interwoven other than Einsteins belief .

 

There is decades of proof of Einstein's model. The movement of objects in our solar system, satellites, gravitational waves, etc., etc. - there are numerous examples of events confirming Einnstein's model.

Einstein's model is in every cell phone as a legal requirement.

 

You don't have a clue what you are talking about. Relativity has been tested extensively. It makes correct prediction that no other theory can and is never wrong.

 

Huh?

 

No , you don't have a clue what you're talking about and you obviously can't read .

'' It would be quite absurd , subjective and illogical to disagree with the postulates without providing proof of evidence to demonstrate falsity of the postulates . ''

 

Please feel free to try and prove falsity , provide evidence to the contrary ! I know you can't .

1) Space cannot be created or destroyed

2) Space is immovable

3) Space is timeless and has no mechanism to age or decay

4) Space is the unique property of a void

5) Space has no mechanism to be visible light or visible dark

6) Space is transparent

7) Space has no physicality

 

Einsteins model has time and space interwoven , space is independent and timeless .

 

Cell phones are required by law to have location services for use in an emergency.

Location services depend on GPS, which doesn't work unless corrections are made for the speed and altitude of the various GPS satellites.

The reason is that GPS satellites fly fast enough that time passes at a different rate than on earth. Also, the differing proximity to the center of mass of the earth is a factor in the passage of time.

 

Well, space is itself expanding.

When a volume of space expands, it necessarily affects the location of other space.

In fact, over stupendous distances the expansion of each increment between two points can add to more than the speed of light. So, objects are actually leaving our visible universe. They are receding at such a speed that any light they emit will NEVER reach earth. And, the reason is that the expansion of each intervening piece of space is expanding, with the total exceeding light speed.

So, one can run experiments to determine the rate of expansiion of space.

 

Once again, you show how little you know and understand. At non-relitavistic speeds, Special Relativity and Newton's laws agree.

As other posters have said, Einstein's theories have been repeatedly proven experimentally.

 

Please stop communicating with me and posting mediocre minded retarded **** in my thread . Space itself is not expanding , naive children might fall for this rubbish but I am an adult !


I am sick of science lying now to the world with its fairy tales , you are hilarious .

 

Can you even read ? Einstein chit is wrong , get over it !

 

Yes I can read.

You claim Einstein is wrong.

Reams of experimental evidence show that you are incorrect. Many ubiquitous devices like mobile phones and GPS systems rely on relativistic effects.

 

Oh boy ! Go back and read what I wrote in my theory , like I said can you read ?

The Universe inside and out is a scientific investigation and research project that has taken over a decade to complete that considers past physics and present physics . A journey of discover that will advance present science thoughts and theory , correcting semantic errors and incorrect interpretation , opening up a whole new era of science in regards to physics and physical process .
The Universe inside and out makes reference to Dirac , Newton , Higgs , Tesla and Einstein , concluding an united field theory namely the N-field theory , an united field theory that explains the beginning of the visual universe , unites field matter ( spatial quantum fields ) and atomic matter ( Visible objects ) into an united manifold that is independent of space. Additionally the Universe inside and out explains the gravity mechanism , the true nature of light and the meaning of time .

 

Ah, saying it's a law that Relativity is in there sounded weird.

 

Show me the published paper.

 

It will be published after I have wrote eight more parts ! I asked for peer help , how does it read ?

I didn't ask for incorrect lessons on physics !

I have asked science forums before , I have asked religious forums , nobody can demonstrate the seven postulates to be false therefore they are true .

 

LOL! You have overturned Einstein but can't do the work yourself. Too funny!!!

Everything you post is total and utter nonsense. There is no help for you.

And arbitrary responses at a political forum IS NOT peer review. That amounts to nothing more than bar talk.

 

Oh really, if it is utter nonsense then you will have no problem demonstrating the falsity of my postulates . You quite clearly are lying unless you really are that ''stupid'' !

Come on then smart ass , start with showing you can create or destroy space ?

1) Space cannot be created or destroyed

 

What do you mean by space ? Space is a very "unscientific" word.

The universe is demonstrably expanding so in that regard, "space" is being created.

 

For purposeful and meaningful discussion I feel it is of utmost importance that we fisrtly all agree upon the defintion of space .

1. A continuous area or expanse which is free, available, or unoccupied.

It is important we do not change the context of this definition where semantics are important . People often generalise space as being contents included which is contradictory to our definition of space and not of fact .

Exactly what it says it means , an unknown volume of emptiness / nothingness .

A metric expansion between observer and a receding body is not creating space , the space already exists , it is beyond the receding body .

 

Actually, I'm a physicist.

If you are a child, then go to school and learn. You clearly have an avid interest in physics but don't have the maturity to learn instead of spewing nonsense. Go to school. Take math, chemistry, and physics classes. Learn how to apply yourself to to the task of real learning. If you are an adult, then get a life.

 

You don't have to be a physicist to do physics , it is kinda easy .

Can you as a person think of a single way to destroy space ?