actually I pointed out it was gibberish. Since it doesn't actually represent anything, it is neither correct or incorrect. It's just retarded.
If you actually discussed it , questioned it , you might actually understand it . -Q is equal to one negative point charge , ok so far? +Q is equal to one positive point charge , ok so far?
Here is a real problem. How much current will flow in a circuit consisting of two 30 ohm resistors connected in parallel, followed by a 50 ohm resistor in series, if we apply 10 volts across the circuit?
If you pour two gallons of water at 100 degrees, and 4 gallons of water at 105 degrees, into a tub containing 5 gallons at 70 degrees, what will be the final temperature of the water?
That isn't a problem because I'm not trying to explain that am I ? You're being ridiculous , that is a completely different set of physics to learn if I choose to do scientific electrical engineering . That is why there is no ''I'' in team, not one person is expected to know everything ...
Jane spent $42 for shoes. This was $14 less than twice what she spent for a blouse. How much was the blouse?
There are b boys in the class. This is three more than four times the number of girls. How many girls are in the class?
Algebra does not and can never answer the physics of the Universe , it is pointless to my theory , I've no need to learn algebra . I don't need algebra to have design ideas based on physics or a theory of physics . You're just trying to belittle me , it proves nothing . I can prove there is no time dilation and all sorts of mediocre minded errors in science , if you want to go there with the belittle ...... Besides you couldn't understand A + B = 1 before A + B becoming the dot product A.B
Physics is nothing but math. If it isn't math, it is philosophy, not physics. The Greeks shows us that you can't solve the mysteries of the universe with philosophy. That's why we use physics.
What is the definition of the dot product. Explain how to use it. Show me a cross product in matrix form.
What is the force of gravity due to an electron located 5 feet away? What is the magnitude of the electric field you would measure?
How about Relativity: How fast would an object have to be moving for its mass to triple compared to its rest mass?
So what do you hope to gain by these sort of questions that are irrelevant to my notions? Are you going to prove me wrong or shut up ?
you've already been proven wrong. The point of the questions being asked, is to further demonstrate you do not have even the most rudimentary understanding of physics.