The media didn't convince me. Those 51 intelligence officers did. Robert Epstein's study and recording of Googles ephemeral experiences has reinforced my belief.
They censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, and probably anything else that made Biden look bad. They used ephemeral experiences (which they thought couldn't be tracked) to switch votes over time.
You will have to be specific about who “they” are and how “they” censored anything. And your second sentence is meaningless gibberish.
The FBI told social media companies to censor it. Did Twitter tell the public that we like Joe Biden, so we aren't going to allow this on our platform? No. They lied to the public in order to use their tech to censor without the public being aware they were. They called it Russian disinformation. They should have acted like honorable people, and admitted they were using their toys to be partisan. And ephemeral experiences (the words that pop up when you hit a keystroke, the order of search results, the next video play feature) are not gibberish. They are the most powerful thought control tools humans have ever developed. And they made them completely untraceable as they are gone in an instant, and aren't recorded in any data. They sent daily reminders to 100% of Democrats in the 2022 Georgia Senate race, to register and vote, for months. They did the same to only 30% of Republicans. Again, the big tech CEO's, portions of their employees, and government bureaucrats, mostly within our intelligence services, used technology to subvert our democracy, and now they are projecting onto Trump what they themselves did.
So … according to you … 1 trump’s FBI helped Biden. 2 some private companies supported Biden 3 some private companies encouraged Democrats to vote and you consider that a subversion of democracy? 2 and 3 sound like a robust democracy in action. And 1 didn’t happen.
wrong: 18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material U.S. Code Notes prev | next (a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both. (b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a). (c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security. (Added Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, § 808(a), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3453; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(d)(1)(C)(i), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1809; Pub. L. 115–118, title II, § 202, Jan. 19, 2018, 132 Stat. 19.)
"I" would expect Americans to get a hold of themselves and support our Nations institutions that have served us well for 240 years. The on going attacks against our Justice System are childish. I realize we have the most pampered and privileged jackass in history using every legal loophole he can to obfuscate his crimes. Whining and crying "unfair" every step of the way like a little baby. But it's time for for the rest of U.S. to grow the **** up, act like adults and let the "system" do it's job. ... ... since you asked.
It wasn't Trump's FBI. They brainwashed people against Trump to the point they were willing to act as traitors. And you know my allegations are much deeper than your flippant reply suggests. Keep digging; we aren't all stupid.
Nowhere in the statute that Trump has been charged with, 18 USC 793(e), does it mention classified documents. So your appeal to classification is irrelevant.
Unfortunately, Americans are defrauded no matter who gets elected. As long as Americans are at each others throats, government can continue to spend our money without having to be held accountable. As bad as Trump may be, Dems are just a bit worse.
The POTUS decides what is classified. That's why it says ...has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection... So for example, you aren't going to find that specific Iran document in a law. So that means an EO made it classified if it ever was. Congress didn't make that specific document unauthorized. The POTUS did. And again, the Congress can't pass a law to hold the POTUS to account for his own order to his subordinates.
That law states: ...having unauthorized possession of... So let's use the fabled Iran document as an example again. We both know that specific Iran document is not mentioned in any law. So the question becomes who or what "authorizes" a person to possess that specific Iran document?
That's horseshit, first of all there's AbsaByGodLutely no ****ing way the POTUS could look at all the classified documents that are generated. Not even if he worked at it 24 hours a day and did nothing else. Picking one document doesn't address the scope of the classified document's Trump had in his bathroom in Florida.
What law gives any human being the power to ask the former POTUS' to return a document? As in the exact title(s) of the person authorized to call him and request something and gives said person the authority to override the former POTUS's discretion, or his claim that the document being requested isn't related to national security?