Man loses his gun rights for asking officer to run license plate number

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by kazenatsu, Apr 6, 2022.

  1. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    9,103
    Likes Received:
    4,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    I agree that it was a crime to get the police to check out a license plate number but I see no compelling evidence of further criminal intent beyond simple curiosity.
     
  2. cabse5

    cabse5 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    7,217
    Likes Received:
    2,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    SIAP. Pants, the Op is asking (if I may be so bold) if this murkiness as Pants describes it is enough of a rationale to violate the 2ND Amendment?
     
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2022
  3. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,192
    Likes Received:
    28,696
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah. I hadn't seen that. thanks
     
  4. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,732
    Likes Received:
    7,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You agree its a crime, full stop the charges are proper.

    As to further intent: Simple curiosity? One does not commit a felony over simple curiosity. What good faith reason could he have for committing a felony to obtain a skip trace on the person his ex is now ****ing?
     
  5. DaveBN

    DaveBN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2018
    Messages:
    9,063
    Likes Received:
    4,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I’m not familiar with the laws surrounding the misdeed, but the consensus seems to be that it was a felony, so I’ll go off that.

    I believe he should serve a sentence in line with his crime; then his rights, including his rights to own a firearm, should be restored.
     
  6. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,856
    Likes Received:
    11,320
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Under the current law, they could be restored, but the government gets to decide whether they will in that specific case.

    It seems (to me) like a violation of individual rights that the default legal position is his rights are automatically permanently taken away, and then he can (maybe, not guaranteed) get those rights back at the discretion of the government.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2022
  7. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    32,152
    Likes Received:
    21,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    depends on the felony. draft dodger-marijuana possession, a tax fraud, etc No

    murder, forcible rape, armed robbery, attempted murder probably
     

Share This Page