Man-Made Global Warming Theory Takes Major Hit

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jul 12, 2019.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of this contradicts anything I said. Nor did I ever claim 100% of our current warming is due to CO2. Stop making **** up.
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2019
    Bowerbird likes this.
  2. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,178
    Likes Received:
    28,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Specifically, you showed nothing to me. Perhaps you forgot to whom you actually responded, but it wasn't to me. I responded to a post you made to demonstrate how superficial your observation you made to another poster was. So, I can see why you are confused... So, again, your very superficial experiment doesn't replicate the complexity of the atmosphere or the mechanisms within it. Simple stuff here. It just seems you aren't able to recognize it.
     
  3. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,178
    Likes Received:
    28,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok, so do you at least find some affinity then towards the small fractional conclusion of the thread cites study? Do you agree then that only 1/100th of a degree Celsius is the actual result of human production?
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You better go tell the entire scientific community that they’ve got physics and chemistry wrong then.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  5. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, as the study cited is an outlier, hasn’t been peer reviewed, and is in direct conflict with studies which have been.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  6. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How much of the current warming is due to increasing CO2 concentration. BTW the IPCC claims that all the current warming is due to increasing CO2 concentration resulting from human emissions. Are they wrong ??
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2019
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can you cite the portion of the IPCC study which claims all the warming is due to CO2?
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  8. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,178
    Likes Received:
    28,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why? The anlaysis of the thermodynamics here are in fact what is leading to this determination and conclusion. Your fear though is humorous....
     
  9. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,178
    Likes Received:
    28,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So much fun. So, when it is peer reviewed, and valid, whatever will you do then? :roflol::roflol:
     
    AFM likes this.
  10. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The IPCC only considers AGW. Are you claiming they are wrong ?? Are you claiming that the IPCC states that AGW is not responsible for 100% of global warming ?? If so what percentage is AGW responsible for ??
     
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because that is what you are claiming. I quite clearly showed his claim that CO2 doesn’t increase temperature was complete bullshit.
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If it passes scrutiny it will be accepted. It hasn’t, which is why it’s not.
     
  13. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So that’s a no then? You can’t cite the portion of the IPCC study that you claimed states warming is 100% due to human CO2 release? We both knew that of course.
     
  14. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What part of the fact that the IPCC only considers AGW and uses total warming to calculate the climate sensitivity of CO2 eludes you ????
     
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So no, you can’t cite any part of the IPCC report that states what you claim. Thank you.
     
  16. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Too funny. When you are in a hole stop digging.
     
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re pathetic. You made a demonstrably false claim, I called you on it by challenging you to produce any part of the study which supports your moronic claim, which you can’t do because it isnt in there. and you say I’m in a hole? Lol how embarrassing for you.
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2019
    Bowerbird likes this.
  18. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There you go again.
     
  19. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep. I have a habit of refuting your bullshit.
     
  20. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And again.
     
  21. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep. I have a habit of refuting your bullshit.
     
  22. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re on a roll.
     
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep. I have a habit of refuting your bullshit.
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  24. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,250
    Likes Received:
    74,527
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Did they?

    Citations please

    And this is exactly why I am replying like for like because I will now make an equally valid but unsupported counterclaim

    Those warming periods have been explained and there was associated CO2 rise
     
  25. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,250
    Likes Received:
    74,527
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Does it?

    Which ipcc report states that and what page is the claim made on?
     

Share This Page