Michael Cohen Secretly Taped Trump Discussing Payment to Playboy Model

Trump's huge advantage is that he is such a notorious slut and shameless liar that revelations that he is a notorious slut and shameless liar are a belabouring of the painfully obvious - e.g., noting that spewing millions of tonnes of industrial greenhouse gases into the atmosphere impacts the atmosphere. Only an incorrigible pifflewit wouldn't have gotten it by now.

Among Trump's most fanatical disciples (next to neo-nazis and white supremacists who venerate their "Glorious Leader!" with "Heil Trump!") are the righteous, bible-humping evanjellies that promenaded to the polls to vote for him shortly after they heard him boast that his celebrity licensed him to grab women by their privates.

Campaign contribution requirements aside, Fixer can only confirm Trump's residence in a moral sewer - unless there is also evidence unrelated to sexual depravity.

 

The recording is clear admission.

 

No the constitution says bribery, high crines and misdemeanors. Please tell me where in the Constitution it says perjury and obstruction are high crimes or a misdemeanor or bribery.

And nobody is talking impeaching Trump for being a sleezy human being that cheats on his wives with porn actresses or playboy bunnies.

 

So what saint did you vote for in the last election?

 

What recording?

 

Before you rip your pants, listen to it. After all, Trump waived attorney-client privilege over the recording(s) so that you could!

 

First thing about the case is it was assigned to her in 1975. She didnt even want to really defend him but was appointed by the Judge and tried to get out of it from what I have read

Also the claim of her saying the defendant made it up and was fantasizing about it were from other people like an expert in child psychology and what other people had said about the girl to be used as a defense. Also was an underage boy who was 15 involved in this whole situation too

The defendant also pled guilty to a lesser offense there wasnt an actual trial with jury. There is no evidence that I have read or seen that Clinton was directly laughing at the girl for being raped or what happened to her that night. It was more around the prosecution and other aspects of the case.

Im glad we can revisit something 40+ years in the past.

But none of the facts around it concern Dishonest Donald who prob read or heard about the case from a RW article or something

All I can tell is she did her job well that she was assigned to

According to the prosecutor
"She apparently went to the judge, and he refused to let her out," Gibson said. "And at that point, she fired all guns. She mounted an excellent defense, I'll give her credit for that."

Even Roy Reed, the interviewer from this tape has said Clinton never laughed at the rape victim

I wonder if the victim got paid off by Trump because in a previous statement she said she had no ill will towards Clinton but then she pops up again right in time for Trumps campaign. Not sure why she would be mad at Clinton anyway when her prosecutor and mother seemed more to blame for wanting a quick trial and being a terrible prosector with the handling of the evidence in respect to the defense.

 

Access Hollywood recording of course.

 

Hillary of course being the lesser of two weevils.

 

I was wondering why I was struggling with it. He admitted that they let him do it. Letting him do it confers consent, not assault.

 

Yeah pretty tough for you to claim any kind of moral high ground (as you attempted) when you yourself felt the need to sink to that depth.

 

He's whipping your asses.

Giuliani: "The Guy Running It Was Brennan"

 

Did you change your mind or were you just making up **** before?

 

I'm in the same camp as you with respect to the lying. We teach our children not to lie. Its one of the 10 Commandments (for any on the right who are Christians). But the ever growing number of proven lies doesn't seem to rattle his base. I think its important to have a leader who doesn't lie as a default. Who doesn't attack people personally in retribution when his policies have been attacked. Everytime it is brought up, the response is "But Hillary...". "But Obummer..." Firstly, Hillary didn't win the presidency - so that's a non starter. And if Obama was found to have lied so consistently, I'd have had a problem with him too. How much is too much?

 

What is your confusion?