Migrant Rape Fears Spread Across Europe

More on the whole or more as a ratio ? There is a difference.

 

Seems the Muslims are now gang raping little boys.........



Kit Daniels | Infowars.com - January 13, 2016 


Syrian "Refugees" Rape Three-Year-Old Boy in Norway



Middle Eastern “refugees” reportedly gang raped a three-year-old boy at an asylum center in Norway, police say.

Police were tipped off about the Jan. 6 assault on Wednesday by a person calling from a telephone outside the Forus Akuttinnkvartering center located in Stavanger, Norway’s third-largest city.

“We are investigating the case as if the worst thing has happened, we are talking about the rape of a child,” police superintendent Bjorn Kare Dahl told Stavanger Aftenblad. “We have no suspects yet.”




After the attack, the boy was taken to a rape crisis center and then a children’s hospital, according to local media, who also said the boy and his caretakers were later interviewed by police.

Nearly 800 migrants are staying at the Forus center, one of several in the far northern European country.

In a similar incident, at least 15 Muslim migrants, 14 from Syria and one from Afghanistan, were engaged in mass sexual molestation of German women during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne.

 

And this is forever.

And will only get worse as millions more Muslims invade Europe.

 

Once again, an argument that feels the necessity to apply exaggerations to their notion. A more accurate example would have been a group of people holding Crossco responsible for another company's failure rate.. because that's what we're currently seeing with the Syrian refugees. We saw a wave of crime in Germany that involved over 80 suspects, including 18 migrants.. none of them were Syrian refugees, yet they seem to be the most talked about group in regards to these crimes in Germany

Also, what about the fatality rate for the people of Syria? More people are likely to die from rejecting refugees than from accepting them. Syria is quite literally the most dangerous country in the world right now, and if no one provides sanctuary for these people then surely many of them would die

Well you touch on a good point, and that is the wave of people that are arriving on foot into many of these European countries. I'm not going to say there isn't an additional security risk that comes with having large masses of people arrive in such a way, because there absolutely is a security risk. It's not quite the same predicament for the US, for one the refugees aren't technically refugees by US standards, but they are refugees for international standards, thus the refugees that the US takes in come from the UN program. On top of that, it is worth noting that over 75% of the Syrians who are registered to the UN's refugee program are women and children http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/regional.php

The US also doesn't simply accept refugees from the UN program and then they arrive the next day.. no, the process of the US taking in these refugees

Before refugees face U.S. screening, they must get a referral from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (or occasionally a U.S. embassy or another NGO). The UN refers about 1 percent of refugees for resettlement through its own vetting process, which takes four to 10 months. During that process, UN officials decide if people actually qualify as refugees, if they require resettlement, and which country would accept them.

Once the cases are passed along to the United States, the refugees undergo security clearances. Their names, biographical information and fingerprints are run through federal terrorism and criminal databases. Meanwhile, the refugees are interviewed by Department of Homeland Security officials. If approved, they then undergo a medical screening, a match with sponsor agencies, "cultural orientation" classes and one final security clearance.

Syrian refugees in particular must clear one additional hurdle. Their documents are placed under extra scrutiny and cross-referenced with classified and unclassified information.

The process typically takes one to two years or longer and happens before a refugee ever gets onto American soil.


Generally refugees are accepted into the US as families, only 2% of those brought to the US thus far have been single males

You're right to say that we shouldn't accept just anyone who applies as a refugee, and I can't speak for every country but I can tell you the US does not accept just anyone. However, another thing I must stress is the burden put on other countries when the gates are shut for refugees entirely. In countries like Jordan and Lebanon they are caring for more people than what they are capable of, the number of people arriving in Europe are just a fraction of what countries like Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey are dealing with.

Even then so, I do believe Germany is taking in more refugees than they should.. but the reason why they're even in this position is due to other European nations who refuse to take any at all. If every country in Europe pledged to take in what the UK has pledged, then this issue wouldn't exist.. Germany wouldn't have to take in such large numbers.

I also believe that the US should be playing a bigger role than they are in this Syrian refugee crisis, there's no reason for the US to pledge less than Canada

 

And the result is impunity. They are going to do it again. And again. And again.

But it is not bad policing. It is bad (politically correct) politics.

Yes, I think precisely that. The Left is busy demoralizing Western civilization. To turn it around, we have to learn to revalue what is good and true and the first step is to reject what is evil and false. It doesn't seem exceptional at all. It was standard policy in the US and Australia before the Left conceived the notion of demoralizing the West.

 

There are thousands and they are Muslims. I don't care about the pedigree.

And I don't care about Cresco.

Certainly not to the point of committing suicide out of remorse.

 

and another exaggeration to present your notion, you're on a roll

No taking in refugees is not equatable to suicide, again there are more likely to be fatalities from rejecting these refugees than from accepting them. If these people can't find sanctuary then many of them would die

 

I don't care.

 

For (*)(*)(*)(*)s sake!!

 

Which explains why the police chief lost his job.

"Demoralizing"? If xenophobic bullying and a constant refrain from the right about how broken America is, isn't demoralizing, I guess we have a rather dramatic difference of word meaning.

 

The USA handles this situation with refugees much better than Europe does, Sweden and Germany in particular. The USA cares about their safety and about making sure they help genuine refugees and not frauds. Sweden does neither. Our security service in Sweden has said that there is a terrorist threat against Sweden. they even raised the "threat level" against Sweden rather recently. They've said ISIS fighters are going from Sweden to Syria, and many returns, but they are completely toothless to do anything about it. it's probably not even a crime to fight for ISIS. And then there's plenty more people comming in who they don't even have a clue about. They have officially said several times that they don't have the time to check everyone that comes, and when people come here they are free to just walk away without even registring. or well, it has perhaps gotten better now that ID-checks were introduced, but we still let in many people prior to that. Point is, there are plenty of people who we don't know who they are, or where they are, in Sweden right now. We've just let in random strangers from the middle east basically, while we are at war with a middle eastern terrorist group. That's the security part. Needless to say, it's miserable.

as for lettining in obvious frauds... There's been whistleblowers working in the swedish migration agency, and they've revelead that the official instructions are basically to get people through as fast as possible, not to do background checks as good as possible. This is probably because this process is very slow and bureucratic, and it's understaffed, and that there's a huge number of people comming. But still, it basically means anyone is let in without any checks, even obvious frauds. Did you know that Sweden has the highest level of underage minors comming alone to seek asylum? Did you also know that Sweden doesn't do any kinds of age-testing at all to see if they're actually minors, and that we believe everyone's bs story about how they lost all their identification papers? it's ridiculous. All you have to do is throw away your papers and say you're 16 and they'll let you in. I've seen many ridiculous pictures of supposed "minors". The fun doesn't stop there though, since these "minors" are then housed with actual minors. We've had rape incidents, suprise suprise.

But who cares about the wellbeing of actual minors, of actual refugees, when you have an agenda to push? immigration to Sweden isn't cheap either.. We've had to make cuts in many places to pay for all of this, and funnily enough, much came from foreign aid. That's the saddest irony with this. We take money which could feed real refugees in jordan (they're starving atm aren't they?) to pay for housing and feeding frauds in Sweden. nevermind the frauds though, this is true even for real refugees. The fact is that if we spend one krona on helping a real refugee in Sweden, we could've helped five refugees with that same krona in lebanon or jordan. If you really care about helping people, you wouldn't want to do it with immigration to Sweden, because it's ineffective.

So no, I don't believe Germany and Sweden did right, not even a little bit right. It us us who caused this huge trek across europe, because we lured them here with our generous benefits. is it just a coincidence that the refugees walked to the countries which would give them the most money? being a refugee gives you a right to seek safety, and we have an obligation to care for that. But we have no obligation to take in people who move for economic motives. Not a single person who travelled across europe was a real refugee, not a single one. They had all passed through turkey, greece, balkans and many other safe countries. They already had safety, so if they come here and claim to be fleeing we know it's bs. it doesn't matter if they were once real refugees, because the moment they have safety but still want to move they are not real refugees anymore. Then they are moving for reasons other than safety, and we have no obligation to care for them. if Sweden and Germany hadn't lured them with goodies, they wouldn't have walked across europe like that. Quite frankly, if we haven't lured them they wouldn't have died in the mediterranean. it's much better to just be very clear and say: "No, you cannot come here, you will not be let in. We will help you where you are instead, so stay there". I like the australian approach to this very much.

 

`
`
Meanwhile, back in Germany; German leisure centre becomes the first to ban all migrants after a schoolgirl was sexually assaulted in a public swimming pool by Syrian teenagers .

 

Why do you keep changing your statement? You claimed that whites committing rapes in Europe was a bigger problem then Muslims committing rapes in Europe. I offered two articles as a counter point. One article was from Sweden and one from Germany. You then became fixated on Sweden. Yet, the only way your claim can be correct is if you assume a statistically consistency. A consistency that has been completely disproven. Now, for the second time, you are trying to change your statement. If you now see that your wrong then admit it, and move on.

I would suggest you go back and read that report again. Primarily page 56. You will see that it the Swedes that 95% of the population has not been accused of committing a crime. For the population with one foreign born parent, the percentage drops to 92.1%, and foreign born to 87.6%. All this really does is demonstrate that your ideology of statistical consistency is wrong.

 

Quite so. He was scapegoated for implementing the multicultural ideas of his masters.

Well, duh!

Of course we have different definitions. We value different things. I value European culture. You value multiculture.

You aim to demoralize Europeans so they will not defend themselves against invaders from alien cultures.

I aim to demoralize the multiculturalists like you who value Muslim rapists over European women.

My task is easier because I have the facts on my side.

 

Germany and Sweden are not the center of the refugee crisis, 95% of all Syrian refugees are in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt, and on top of that UN funds haven't even reached half of what is needed to care for these people. What Germany and Sweden are dealing with is just a fraction of the issue, but still more than what should be put on any country. Again, this wouldn't be an issue if more countries made a contribution to take in some refugees. There are wealthy middle eastern and European countries that flat out refuse to take in any refugees, and for every country that refuses to contribute anything, the bigger the burden is put on those who are helping

You can talk about how the refugees sole purpose for migrating should be safety, but they're also looking for a place to live. Many of them land in Greece, but Greece is unwilling to take them in due to their own financial woes. I'm sorry, but if you're still stuck in the predicament of not being able to find food and shelter for your family, of course you're going to keep on moving. And again, many are going to Germany and Sweden, but the bulk of them still remain in just 5 middle eastern countries

 

Meanwhile, in Germany there is a trial accounting the rape and abuse of 200 children by white devils, do our resident kkk enthusiasts even care about what is happening to their little boys by their own tribe?

Lesson: don't cry and whine when you yourself are silent about your own practices, anybody would think its fair game judging by the lack of topics on filthy white fake christians

 

And in the UK proceedings were stopped against Lord Janner another member of the privileged class got away with child abuse, just like Ceril Smith and Jimmy Saville. Yet it does not even make the news!

 

Hmm. Seems to be an agenda in some minds here!! Where is the outrage? This is little boys being raped and abused by white "males" yet our resident tribalists here turn a blind eye, much like their Catholic organization. Is it to be assumed that raping can only be done by dirty old white men?

 

Your task is incredibly easy since other than in your head there are no multicultralists who value Muslims rapists over European women, none, nada, not one.

Brilliant strategy though, create non existent enemy, then thoroughly trounce them!

 

Just the soon to be done Trump Brigade...

 

How about the multiculturalists who ignored the rape of European women by Muslims because admitting to the problem would cast a bad light on Muslims?

 

No, he was fired for NOT DOING HIS JOB PROPERLY.

Nice mischaracterization of my position, but rather revealing about yours.

I do not aim to demoralize anyone, but I take note that you actually believe that exposure to other cultures is demoralizing for your own. Such tribalism is a regrettable human characteristic found across all cultures. I bet your sense of tribal commune makes you feel so good that it justifies the aggressive exclusion you and your pals advocate. I believe the euphemism you employ is "European culture", despite everyone knowing you mean white Christian culture.

Yes there are some disconnected facts stuck amongst the mounds of prejudice and xenophobia.

I have found that the strongest advocates for preserving their culture seem to think that their culture is too weak to withstand exposure other cultures even when those cultures are in the small minority. Odd.

 

Yes a bigger problem. More white males rape more women than black or brown. Way more "Christian" males rape woman than "muslim" males. The issue of rape is FAR BIGGER than just muslim immigrants. Wanna argue statistics and per capita and all that - okay. But in a straightforward numerical count my statement that white rapists were a bigger problem than muslim rapists is entirely accurate. Why is this so hard for you?




I would suggest you go back and read that report again. Primarily page 56. You will see that it the Swedes that 95% of the population has not been accused of committing a crime. For the population with one foreign born parent, the percentage drops to 92.1%, and foreign born to 87.6%. All this really does is demonstrate that your ideology of statistical consistency is wrong.[/QUOTE]

Oh, didn't you also read in the analysis of the "rate of suspicion" anomaly weighing against immigrants?

 

White Christian Culture and European Culture and Western Culture are all synonyms. At least I use them interchangeably.


Exposure to other cultures is not demoralizing. It is your constant attempts to belittle and demonize those who champion White Christian Culture which are attempts to demoralize.

And yes, European Culture is weak. Its heirs are so demoralized, by you and your cronies, they don't even bother to reproduce. But I am proud of its accomplishments in the arts, sciences and humanities which show every other culture to be an also ran, although I give honorable mention to Chinese culture. And I note well your attempts to belittle and demonize those who so believe.

Islam is resurgent, triumphalist and aggressive. It can and does do serious damage to the weakened Western Culture. I realize I am fighting a rear-guard action, but where there is life there is hope and my hope is that White people will come to recognize you and your ilk for the maggots you are.

 

Mooslumic refugees need to get the message...

Cologne attacks: Migrant men banned from German swimming pool
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 - A town near Cologne in Germany bans male asylum seekers from a public swimming pool after complaints from women of sexual harassment.