are you actually suggesting that someone cannot be a bigot simply because they are a Gay Jew who has a black boyfriend? they cant be bigoted against Muslims, or Arabs, or Hispanics? LOL!!!1
And the pearls....out RAAGEous, who does he think he is, an oyster? Seriously, he's got the same problem as just about every conservative comedian, he very quickly tilts over from being funny to mean. I've only seen two conservatives who do comedy well and that's Dennis Miller and Michael O'Donohughe. My theory is it's a basic flaw in the material as conservative ideology is basically all about being uncaring and mean and it's hard to keep that from coming through
Some conservatives certainly don't. This guy could run a child slavery business and quite a few of the President's more rabid advocates would say he deserved nothing more than a big tax break if he supported the Orange God.
Despite what some wish to believe, being racist is not a criminal act that can be punished. However promotion of pedophilia is endorsing a criminal act that causes real harm, and is no different from advocating for the murder of others.
Milo is just one more creepy hero for the alt-right. Without his Breitbart, Trump would never have won.
It certainly clears up his thought process. I still think he has some issues to work out, but he doesn't deserve the humiliation and ridicule he's receiving. It's a sad day when the so called Republicans are jumping on the politically correct bandwagon. No one is safe now. No one.
OP...Don't know much about that Milo guy. I had heard he was a conservative, but he sounds like a fascist dem to me.
Well, Milo learned HIS lesson. Pederasty acceptable only for refugees and illegals. Then libs will support you. ~ Ann Coulter
Imagine how awful it must be to not only be the victim of a paedophile but then to have the media and liberals call you a paedophile.
That doesn't represent any kind of a bind. If he was promoting paedophilia, he would be censored for the illegality. That would be right. You can't say someone who advocates murder is "censored" when he's denied a platform. There is no inconsistency I can see. His comments certainly have a whiff of paedophilia about them. It isn't surprising that a demonstrative gay bloke who seeks to shock people will at some point go down that road. Older gay men like younger men. Joe Rogan was extremely prudish about 15 year old girls. Show me a straight man who hasn't at some point fancied a sexually mature girl at that age and I'll show you a liar. MY was being entirely candid there. Joe was being a prudish dick.
Are they calling him a paedophile? If they are, there was nothing in the interview to justify that. Technically speaking he appears to be a victim of paedophilia, but he claims to have been totally OK with it and even in charge, so the otherwise despicable Father Michael doesn't look as bad as he might, in context. The only dodgy bit was the talk about Hollywood parties with "VERY young men present". Even then, we don't know if they were underage. But it was very ambiguous, although pretty smelly.
Then I'm not a right-winger. Who knew? Not a problem, when the censoring authority is a private entity controlling a venue it owns. If you have a problem with that, you have a problem with moderated internet forums. More than either of those he needs to shut the hell up and stop befouling the conservative brand. Because no conservative worthy of the name would publicly attest to the legitimacy of a perversion, as every professing homosexual does.
And you would also be someone who thought the "(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) grabbing" comment by Trump was just "being a boy" - - - Updated - - - And you would also be someone who thought the "(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) grabbing" comment by Trump was just "being a boy"