Most gay couples probably aren't getting married even now that it's legal

It's not even a debatable point. The record of the discussion is in writing, so the attempt to 'correct' what you said is irrelevant, given that what you said is directly above for the Reader to witness for themselves.

So what? AIDs is natural... that doesn't mean that it's something we should promote through declaring it NORMAL.

Homosexuality is a deviation from the human sexual standard, established through the human physiological design. And what's more, homosexuality deviates as far FROM that standard as is HUMANLY possible.

 

I know. you lost the exchange, because it's not debatable

yes, my refutation of your statements is readily available and is a matter of public record here on the forum.

you can't promote homosexuality, or heterosexuality. it's something people are born with.

homosexuality is as natural as heterosexuality, and has existed for the entirety of human history.

It's part of human standards.

 

Reader... what you're witnessing in the above would-be 'contribution' is an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder; OKA: Delusion.

 

What science do you have that proves homosexuality isn't natural?

 

and yet, every assertion you have made has been thoroughly demolished. Lol

- - - Updated - - -

his bible

 

No... Homosexuality is not a consequence of genetics, thus no one is 'born' homosexual. That has been soundly established by the numerous attempts to establish it as such and zero being the number of genetic components associated with homosexuality.

Homosexuality is a consequence of learned behavior... the result of child molestation in the form of genital game play, which prematurely induces a hormonal response in infants and toddlers, which imprints upon them sexual desire for the gender which induced the response.

By normalizing homosexuality, the culture assures that more children will be increasingly subject to homosexuals, thus increasing the opportunities for such to induce the aforementioned response, thus increasing the instances of homosexuality, which given the sociopathic consequences of such, provides that the viability of that culture is reduced.

There's nothing complex about any of this.

- - - Updated - - -

I've not argued that homosexuality isn't natural... I've argued that it is a deviation from the human physiological norm... thus represents a deviation from the standard which promotes the viability of the human species.

But, in terms of science, I have the science which studies Human Physiology, its construct, purpose and its role in sustaining the biological imperative.

You?

- - - Updated - - -

Ahh... isn't that adorable?

This reminds me of a pup I used to own, who would hop up on its hind legs when I walked it.

LOL! It too, SO wanted to be counted as human.

 

show me the "heterosexual" gene then.

something doesn't have to be genetic to be an inborn trait.

.
lol, please provide your evidence for the above. Because science says otherwise.

but this isn't an issue, since homosexuality is as natural and normal as heterosexuality.

no, since it's entirely incorrect.

 

Happy to do so... That's the gene which causes the female zygotes reproductive organs to morph into testicles and a penis... which is a consequence of the human physiological design, wherein two distinct, but complementing genders are respectively and specifically designed to JOIN WITH THE OTHER.

Feel better?

 

I asked you to show me the gene which makes one heterosexual. That wasn't it.

try again.

 

Done that... All human's are born hetero-sexual. Homosexuality is a behavior that is learned in infancy, wherein a person of the same gender, stimulates the genitals, inducing a premature hormonal discharge, which imprints sexual stimulation toward that gender. It further associates sexual behavior as 'game-play'. Which is a trait common to homosexuality... and it's chronic sexual promiscuity, inducing the chronic contraction of venereal disease and the development of the HIV... which lead to AIDS. Which is nature's cure for homosexuality... .

Now... in terms of testing the theory... Nature has never developed a hostile response to sound sexual behavior... OKA: Monogamous Hetero-sexuality. AKA: Normality in terms of sexual behavior.

I wonder why that is?

Anyone have a guess?

 

Question is, who's behind this massive movement for acceptance?

 

That would be the forces of darkness... the manifestation of evil; known locally on earth, as "the Ideological Left".

 

As an American, I'm more "DO" than 'try' ... which is why your puerile drivel has already been answered.

All human's are born hetero-sexual. Homosexuality is a behavior that is learned in infancy, wherein a person of the same gender, stimulates the genitals, inducing a premature hormonal discharge, which imprints sexual stimulation toward that gender. It further associates sexual behavior as 'game-play'. Which is a trait common to homosexuality... and it's chronic sexual promiscuity, inducing the chronic contraction of venereal disease and the development of the HIV... which lead to AIDS. Which is nature's cure for homosexuality... .

Now... in terms of testing the theory... Nature has never developed a hostile response to sound sexual behavior... OKA: Monogamous Hetero-sexuality. AKA: Normality in terms of sexual behavior.

I wonder why that is?

Anyone have a guess?

 

What science proves it is a deviation of the "norm"? "Norm" isn't science, it's a group of opinions in a society.

 

LOL!

Come on man... .

There's no way to take that drivel seriously and it wouldn't be fair to respond to it.

Tell ya what... you delete that mess and try to find a lucid point you'd like to offer and we'll take it from there.

 

So what you're saying is, "No Army Soldier, I cannot cite any sources that scientifically proves homosexuality is against the human norm".

Thank you for your deflection. I'm sure God will give you an extra big high five in heaven.

 

Come on big guy, it's common sense, something that's getting in increasingly shorter supply these days.

 

you didn't actually. Please show me the specific gene making heterosexuals, heterosexual.

well no, as some are born homosexual.

well no, as homosexuals are born attracted to the same sex.

nor has it developed a hostile response to homosexuality.

it isn't, so there's nothing to wonder at.

- - - Updated - - -

but you didn't answer. you were asked to show us the gene which makes one "heterosexual" and you failed to do so. so, you need to try again.

then show us the gene.

 

Are these the same people behind open borders and no voter ID?

 

?? Are you kidding me? Of COURSE homosexuals are attracted to the same gender.

What the heck do you think is meant by the word "homosexual"???

Once again, nature consistently provides a variety of external and internal features related to sexuality.

When you say "Nature's" design, that includes same sex orientation. Same sex orientation isn't some Monsanto chemistry project.

 

That your assertion represents such a profound ignorance, that it is not fair to consider it, as to do so is akin to kicking a person with no legs and arms, in the face, when they challenge you to a race.

Your post of foolish... the conclusions are something well short of even "pitiful".

And, as many of my friends are of former Army service, to lend credence to the idiocy advanced under the Army nom de plum, is to insult those good men.

What I am saying is that your would-be 'contribution' does not possess sufficient validity, to be worthy of consideration.

that you will not understand, is what should be reasonably expected of the source of the aforementioned drivel.?

 

Even though gay "marriage" is now legal in all 50 states, it does have it's downfalls for gay couples if they do get hitched...

 

So, this is your way of saying that you can't actually explain why Nature has not attacked Sound Sexual practices, with STDS the HIV and AIDS, despite having done so for unsound sexual behavior?

(Here's a clue: Nature sets the laws... and you choose to adhere to them or not... and where you adhere to such you benefit from having done so... and when you fail to adhere to such, you suffer the consequences of such.)

So let's reveiw:

Nature Designed Human Physiology with two distinct, but complementing Genders. Each respectively and specifically designed to JOIN WITH THE OTHER! And in so doing, nature defines MARRIAGE and establishes the human sexual standard.

Those who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to that law of nature, enjoy the benefits of such and a life free of STDS... and have NO CHANCE of contradicting the HIV... and subsequently AIDS..

Those who reject it... will suffer those unenviable consequences.

And in this... nature intrinsically and overtly discriminates against homosexuals.

And it's because of that... which the Homo-cult weeps and gnashes it collective tooth... in its impotent defiance of nature, as if they are immune from the consequences of natural law. Which is a demonstration of an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder, OKA: Delusion.

And that is truly, all there is to this... .

 

ROFLMNAO!

[video]http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p98/badwolf07/Gifs/tumblr_m7e75o1mJV1rnc0gn_zps48 cf4747.gif[/video]

 

You know, you may be able to use that as an explanation to rationalize your own opinion(s)... but there is a LOT more to human sexuality than that simplistic explanation you hacked together above.

In truth, this forum is hardly the setting to go over it all... mainly because all the prejudices, irrational animus, ignorance and political bias is right here... to infect any reasonable or valid information provided.

Still, there are those who surely CAN and DO disagree with your take on the matter of human sexuality (even in nature) and relationships/marriage etc.

BTW, are you homosexual? (If you don't mind my asking.)