MSNBC and Ed Shultz said Walker would loose, Wrong Again!

Why should anyone lift a finger for you ? Or ten ?

Or you are gonna call someone a liar ? That's like a turd asking "who farted ?

 

Because it's his job as the OP to provide a source?

 

Ummm, Ed Shultz is wrong about allot of stuff. Why would the Wisconsin recall be any different?

 

No. It is not. The rules here are clear on that.

Would it give the OP more credibility ? Sure, although many of us are familiar with Ed Schultz's specific predictions which validate the OP. He predicted victory that day. If you don't believe it, then fine. I don't care what Schultz said. I just found your post so foolish.

However, so as to enlighten you, the lack of a source does not make anyone a liar.

 

Here, here's a link where even Jon Stewart is making fun of Ed Shultz for his coverage of the recall.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...nbcs-coverage-walker-recall-election-msnb-sad

 

Listen to Shultz while talking to Chris Matthews on 6/5/2012 below.
It doesn't contain the beginning portion where Chris
asked him what he thought the Union's chances were of winning and Ed said real good, superior ground game, etc. But you do hear him saying Walker is on the ropes, etc.

If he was on the ropes why did MSNBC call the election for Walker, well before all the votes were even counted? They could have waited if they really believed in the Union vote.

You hear The hatemonger Shultz talking about the outside money that supported Walker, but he
never mentioned the $21 Million Unions spent to defeat Walker in this election, etc.
There was no big money advantage either way and Ed was purposely distorting the truth
by not mentioning that fact. Ed wanted the Union win to be all that more impressive in viewers minds.

It also turns out Ed blamed union voters the next day for voting for Walker.
The night of the election prior to results he was praising them for their votes.
Go figure how stupid Shultz can be!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/you...cs-idea-of-paying-a-compliment-to-ed-schultz/


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/06/Media-Spin-Recall-As-Money-Suck
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/05/ed-schultz-on-scott-walke_n_1570357.html

 

Wolf Blitzer was also very excited the afternoon of the Wisconsin election and
was talking up the Unions chances on CNN bigtime. It could be Shultz was watching Blitzer
or was reading those same bogus exit polls that showed Walker was behind.

It doesn't matter because Walker won in the end and so did the children of Wisconsin.

Afterwards Schultz looked almost teary eyed.
CNN's Wolf Blitzer transformed from 'joyous' to somber almost immediately.
No matter how many fradulent votes the democrats mustered, it wasn't enough on 6/5/2012.

 

Check under rule 7.

 

Hey Sammy and Bluespade, could you find primary sources or was this it?

 

I was a primary sources as I watched MSNBC that day while Shultz bragged about the Union vote.
Ed Shultz and the hate network called MSNBC will watch Obama loose in November.

Voters aren't buying into the anti-Anmerican propaganda MSNBC spews.