Mueller definitely has a big coverup going

I bet you said that OJ was innocent too.

 

Wow!!!

First, only persons currently holding government offices may be impeached.

. . . . And, allegations against Democrats are the ACTUAL distractions, not the other way around. . . . This is clearly an attempt by Trump's administration to discredit the FBI and Justice Department by characterizing the investigation as a collaborative conspiracy complicit with Democrats.

My perception is only clouded by logic and objectivity; the smokescreen was Trump's creation, promulgated by Republican allies and their partisan media, but it hides nothing except what Trump fans don't want to see.

 

I didn't pay attention before the trial. My standards are based on 'evidence' more so than the jury's verdict which is why I included the bit about science in my post. I do think the trial is important to get the evidence out but my opinion isn't a direct reflection of a judge or jury. It is my own based on the evidence presented in the case.

Anything in regards to Trump is way too speculative and we do not have sufficient information to claim he is anything other than innocent at this point. That doesnt mean if new evidence arises we should ignore it. To the contrary.

 

So two states that have more population than 8 or 9 is suppose to be a representation of the Whole country?

See how that works.

 

Subterfuge LMAO
Republicans set up the inquiry and now it's all a Democratic plot?
Please let us know what you're smoking because it must be strong stuff.

 

There are many reasons for this. It was designed to prevent the oppression of the majority. It insures a balance of powers. A one party system is a dangerous system because their isn't someone to keep the party in check. If one party gains too much power it could face the same issues as the one party system.

It also because it isn't a direct democracy but instead a representative democracy. You don't vote for the president but instead vote to tell your representative how you want them to vote for you and they then hopefully listen to their voters.

 

I in NO WAY implied that Trump or anyone else was guilty, and I am willing to accept the findings of the investigation. . . . Are you???

But I believe that evidence is a more appropriate basis for investigation than bias. Closed-minded stubbornness does not promote justice. . . . Acceptance or rejection of evidence on the basis of support of desired pre-judgments is an anathema to American values.

 

Every investigation involves such a "cover-up"

 

Why would you measure counties, except to try to fabricate some legitimacy for donald's selection?

 

If an investigation announces what it is finding, that gives the perps plenty of time to devise a strategy on avoiding, dodging, and stopping the investigation. That is why there is never a violation of the standard of keeping all findings secret until the right time to divulge them. And that is usually at the end. Another seemingly inviolable principle is that those who wish to defend and protect the subject(s) of the investigation always insist nothing is being found and that the investigation should be stopped.

 

This is why trumpistas constantly accuse others of believing in conspiracies. It's projection, just like when creationists try to attack evolution by calling it religious rather than scientific (and therefore false).

 

I have no problem with a state with a tiny population having the same number of senators .
We vote directly for president

 

I agree...but none of us are convicting him..remember the right convicted Hillary ‘s Benghazi ? Obama’s birth certificate?

 

The Russians knew Hillary would be a pushover when she couldn't even spell RESET in Russian at their high level pow-wow.

 

Make that a criminal cover up!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I think we!re to #2784 in conspiracies....lol,

 

That's their weapon of choice when defending the Trump regime. . . . Imaginative scenarios are harder to disprove than outright lies.

 

I can't believe I have to explain this, but counties aren't people. The number of counties has nothing to do with the number of Americans.

 

The newest round of Stroke/Page emails reveals that as they go about scheming against Trump, "Potus wants to know every detail". It is proof that Obama was being briefed and condoned spying on Trump.

That's what this coverup is hiding.

 

I can't follow your logic.
First, the Left is all about commie socialism. They are allies of Russia.
Second, the Clintons took big payoffs from Russia for various cover-reasons, and then sold them our uranium.
Third, Obama let the Russians invade the Ukraine and Syria, and
Fourth, Obama and Kerry lifted sanctions off Iran which created wealth and trade for Russia.

What benefit do they get from Trump?

 

You talking about the "embedded spies" that were not spies and not embedded?

 

Right Lesh, they were embedded "confidential informants".

 

If they or "he" more accurately...were "embedded"...what job did he hold?

 

My guess is, you won't read this.

In all cases, Page and Papadopoulus, and Clovis were "approached" by SPIES trying to entrap them. The spies failed, even when they used Honeybait on Papadopoulus.

You were one who scoffed at Trump when he said he was wire tapped. Now we see he was right. You really want to repeat your last lack of judgment?

BTW - all that redacted stuff the FBI gave to the Senate Intelligence Committee? Most of it was redacted to cover embarrassing actions on the part of the FBI, like McCabe spending $70,000 on a table. http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/24/andrew-mccabe-spent-70000-table-fbi-hid-congress/

 

People do tend to follow the path they prefer.