Mueller indictments prove Trump won fair and square.

Why did Jared need back channel communications with Russia after the election if they were already colluding during it?

 

These conclusions being drawn are silly. Nobody said collusion didn't happen or that it didn't effect the election. Only that it's not claimed in this indictment.

 

When did Mueller announce that his investigation has come to an end.

 

Why would you think it is silly to conclude there has been no Trump/Russia collusion when there is no evidence of Trump/Russia collusion? Why is it silly to conclude it didn't affect the election when there is no evidence it affected the election? In fact, all our intel agencies say there is no evidence a single vote was changed.

What IS silly is continuing to cry about collusion when there is ZERO evidence of collusion.

 

It's becoming more and more of a joke. Russian troll hunting... You got them... all 13. Time to move on.

 

I'm not saying collusion WILL be proven or that well ever know how mush the meddling impacted the election

 

We have no idea if there is zero evidence just because we haven't seen it yet.
They are sure acting guilty.

 

There is a single indictment against 13 (I believe) Russians. It does state there are no Americans in this indictment. The key word is 'this'. There can be multiple indictments. There could be Americans in the next indictment or even the one after that. You're trying so hard to prove trump is innocent that you fail to comprehend what you're reading.

 

Keep the faith!

 

Once again you have to live in fantasy land. Get back to me when you have a real indictment, mmmmkay?

 

Mueller said they had no effect. No American knew they were Russians. Do you believe Russia is the reason Hillary lost her landslide you all were predicting?

I think Russian trolls are actively feeding the lefts fury, do you agree?

 

He did NOT say it had no effect. Stop making **** up

 

WOW, I have to correct your erroneous statement and you suggest I live in a fantasy land. That's pretty funny.

 

You corrected nothing. You created a fictitious scenario.

 

That's what Trumpers are hoping for.

 

You're dismissed.

 

And never acknowledge that Trump set a record for slithering into office while loosing more popular votes than any other presidential candidate in history....

That being said...back on topic...OP...you start a thread that has many duplicates and that is likely due to the incessant parroting of talking points from right wing propaganda sites, so let's set the record straight...

 

So, you think you are "setting the record straight' by quoting the alt-let political hack Adumb Schiffty?

 

Sorry, you don't make that decision.

 

It does NOT say they had no impact. Thats is CLEARLY not in the scope of the investigation. This has been bastardized by the right to make this claim, which if you read the rest of the indictment, it clearly states that they were targeting swing states, and not just helping Trump, but they were doing everything in their power to make sure Hillary wasn't elected. This idea that they had no impact is beyond disingenuous.

That being said, please explain why, now that Trump admits that they did meddle in the election, why is he still not imposing sanctions ?

 

You have a well-chosen online name.

No associations "in this document". That was specified. That is lawyer speak for "there are more documents to come".

He wanted to clearly separate indictments for foreign nationals from US citizens.

 

Really? Where are the indictments for collusion? Where is the evidence of collusion?

 

There are charges for Conspiracy against the United States.

Collusion is not a crime so it couldn't be charged. Any collusion to commit a crime would be a conspiracy charge.

 

Keep the faith!