Because the NRA then comes out with Only a good guy with a gun! only in America is the answer to too many shootings “more guns” The NRA is also going to cash in from income from panic buying as nearly every democrat candidate has come out and said something has to be done
There were not mobs of crazy lib gun grabbers running around loose in those days We didnt know we had it so good
You lose https://www.quora.com/Where-does-funding-for-the-National-Rifle-Association-NRA-come-from No one has ever denied the NRA receives SOME funding from the gun industry but as I stated it is less than half. Even your links fail to challenge that fact which is why they use terms like MUCH of the funding :Like I said try some attention to detail before being pwned and proven wrong as I just proved.
Wrong It includes detailed information to include further links to their tax returns which you asked for and have been specifically given. Massive success destroying you You may now grovel and apologize because EVERYONE sees how easily you were defeated Or just keep acting childish and deny fact
Not really because all the personal freedoms in the world don’t stop bullets from killing you. How did personal freedom help everyone in Dayton today? Or El Paso? Or California?
In order to achieve an important end yes It takes money to protect peoples rights. Even other civil rights organizations such as the ACLU have to be funded
They are the target of politicization, they did not start the fight. The left has been attacking them and the 2nd Amendment for decades, doing everything they can to snuff them out. The NRA is not the enemy. It's the people that are attacking the them and attacking the Constitution.
The power of the NRA and other gun lobbies is the wind behind McConnell's back as to why he won't move legislation passed through the House, bi-partisan gun legislation to have its day in the Senate.
None of the proposed legislation would have served to physically prevent this act from occurring. Therefore there is no sense in discussing such proposals as if they held any legitimate merit.
I see you are saying ZERO blacks have been known to fire randomly into a crowd just for the sake of killing masses of people. Therefore the gripe about "black violence" is irrelevant.
Is a mass shooting worse if the shooter doesn't appear to have a motive? The wounded still need treatment, the dead still need buried, the perp still has to pay the price (assuming he lives).
And Democrats are only interested in power and control, specifically any law that makes the electorate more dependent. Removing guns from good people makes them much easier to control. Obviously you can’t prevent the bad people from getting guns so laws aren’t going to really effect them much. I don’t love the NRA, but I get it. I also get that the logistics in making guns illegal will most probably cause a whole lot more deaths then any mass shooting. The idea of police knocking on doors and physically removing guns from homes is quite Nazi germany-like.