How do we know that it was "the left" ? Do we have a copy of the voter registration documents of the Muslim who started the fire ? I think that it's funny enough that it was a Muslim so does anyone need to make up stuff about whether this Muslim is a Democratic party adherent or a Republican ? Just asking for proof to support your allegations.
yes please post that list it should be interesting. I really hate false hate crimes and the criminals who commit them.
I agree. It would not take much to discourage this kind of Chicken Little crap. A few weekends spent picking up road trash on a 5 foot chain gang and these incidents would stop. - - - Updated - - - He did - scroll back.
Well if it was a Synagogue and a fire what set by a member of that Synagogue and the article said that it was set by someone who was a member of the Congregation but failed to call the guy a "Jew" would you be b.....chting about it ?
It just had to be one of those people demonstrating in front of the mosque with their "assault weapons" - just had to be.
I'm sure people call you Margot2 when they see you walking about. In fact, I'd say somewhere around 99% of everyone here at PF is using a fake name. What is your point?
Seriously when there are stories about churches or synagogues or other assorted temples or stuff news articles do not automatically if at all identify any members as Catholic, Baptist, Jew, Jane, Sikh, Hindu, Buddhist. Usually or virtually every time it save "member of", a communicant of, "attends this church, soemting of that nature. You seem to have some fixation that it a Muslim is involved that we need to cream at the top of our lungs " YOU MUSLIM, YOU DIRTY ROOTEN MUSLIM, YOU T-HEAD; YOU MO, YOU YOU YOU...CAMEL .. "
Do you have a list of all the Christians who have burned or vandalized their own churches? Jews who have faked hate crimes? Shucks, that must happen a lot!
No but that is not the point. The point is that you seem to think that there is some conspiracy here that the idiot who set the fire was not called a Muslim. The fact alone that he was identified as someone who "prays" there or attends that Mosque certainly identified him a virtual lock on him being a Muslim. It's like the BS that is leveled against POTUS BO that is not screaming " you, you , you Islamic Fascist Camel Humping BLIT BLAT" somehow "proves" that he does not want to fight Muslim terrorists. A couple few weeks ago about Dec 7th I watched History channel of FDR giving his speech to Congress about the day that will live in infamy. You know what ? He did not say " we need to declare war on those dirty rotten squinty eyed Japs". No he said that we were in a state of war with the Empire of Japan. And you know what ? Congress still declared war on Japan. And you know what ? We still beat Japan even though FDR did not scream" you dirty rotten squinty eyed Japs" ....
Numerous groups are competing for victim status these days... White men, black men, Jews, Arabs, Christians.. you name it.
The victimhood we are talking about here in the US, primarily the faking of a hate crime, is almost exclusively with the liberals. It helps to give credibility to all the whining.
That is heresy. White men - especially white Christian males are victomizors the rest are victimizees. - try to get that straight.
And that isn't near the full list.... It's to the point where the probability is extremely high that a hate crime is a hoax.
Real hate crimes are still rather rare now in the US, as opposed to the all too common fake hate crimes. Are fake hate crimes a form of agitprop? If so it's not working very well - not yet anyway.
That's about 1 fake hate crime every 5-6 days. Not too uncommon, is it Doug? And that's assuming that list includes all fake hate crimes that have occurred. I don't believe it does. I get it. You didn't expect me to produce a long list when you called me on it, but I did. Now you're trying to save face. It's predictable.
